Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2005, 05:16 PM
A.G. Kalman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: California and millitary

bem wrote:

- quote -

> Has California changed how to file if one spouse is
> military, domiciled in another state but the other spouse
> works in California?
> I am only aware of two options in this situation. Married
> filing separately for California even if they filed joint
> for federal. Or Married filing joint using a California
> part year return.
> My client is saying that there is a new law where California
> can not use the non resident military wages to increase
> taxes though. Am I missing something?


Yes the law changed to conform to the Servicemembers Civil
Relief Act. It is all explained in FTB PUB 1032:
http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/04_forms/04_1032pub.pdf

--
Alan
http://taxtopics.net

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 
Old 04-11-2005, 04:57 PM
Katie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: California and millitary

bem wrote:

- quote -

> Has California changed how to file if one spouse is
> military, domiciled in another state but the other spouse
> works in California?
> I am only aware of two options in this situation. Married
> filing separately for California even if they filed joint
> for federal. Or Married filing joint using a California
> part year return.
> My client is saying that there is a new law where California
> can not use the non resident military wages to increase
> taxes though. Am I missing something?


Yes, your client is right, there is a change that affects
2004 returns. It is the result of the 2003 re-enactment of
the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940 (now
called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act of 2003, HR 100),
which precludes the states from including the military
compensation of nonresident members in any way in the
calculating of state tax liability.

Under the old rules, if a married couple with one
nonresident military and one resident civilian spouse filed
a joint California return, the military compensation of the
nonresident member was included in the total taxable income
calculation. The result would ordinarily be to increase the
average rate at which the California income was taxed.

Under the new federal law, the nonresident member's military
compensation cannot be taken into account. The result
ordinarily is to reduce the average rate at which the
California income is taxed.

California conformed to the federal change in 2004,
effective for all open years. If military compensation was
used in calculating total tax for any open year, a claim for
refund may be filed. The FTB requests that the amended
return be marked "HR 100" in red at the top, and that a
daytime phone number be provided.

In preparing 2004 returns, military compensation of a
nonresident member spouse should not be included in the
540NR total income calculation, whether MFS or MFJ.

I confess I haven't looked (don't do any compliance work
myself), but I'd have thought this would be covered in the
2004 Form 540NR instructions.

Katie in San Diego

The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and
does not constitute legal or professional advice.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #-1  
Old 04-07-2005, 07:33 AM
bem
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default California and millitary

Has California changed how to file if one spouse is
military, domiciled in another state but the other spouse
works in California?

I am only aware of two options in this situation. Married
filing separately for California even if they filed joint
for federal. Or Married filing joint using a California
part year return.

My client is saying that there is a new law where California
can not use the non resident military wages to increase
taxes though. Am I missing something?

Beth M.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 

Tags
california, millitary
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
MSA-to-HSA: California tax
Jay: California doesn't conform with federal provisions for HSAs. It looks like they're taxing an MSA-to-HSA rollover twice: - income tax (schedule CA...
Taxes 6 03-21-2005 05:42 AM
California Resident or Not?
A. G. Kalman: The following case was recently decided by the CA Courts of Appeal for the 2nd District (Los Angeles & Ventura). I'm posting it here because it...
Taxes 4 08-19-2004 09:02 PM
Tax & Suvivorship, California
Paul M. White: I'm beneficiary to a will of a 75 yr. woman. We've not married and been together 8 years. I'm 60,not related. She purposely named and left her...
Taxes 6 08-10-2004 09:03 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03 AM.