|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU" <dwoods[at]woods-financial.com> wrote: - quote - > Aside from that, I've yet to > I've had it TWICE in eight years.
Being in the heart of last year's hurricane season (centralFlorida) everyone is coming in looking for huge hurricane deductions.... when they find out there really is not one they are pretty disappointed. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| mytax[at]adams.net wrote: - quote - > Yes that is sudden enough, in my book.
But can mold damage be sudden? As a resident of Richmond on> Yes you may amend your 2003 tax return, > form 1040X. This may be downloaded from: > irs.gov > We had a lot of taxpayers that had losses in the flood of > the Mississippi River in 1993. Lots of people lost > everything. the James for several decades I think not. And mold does not qualify as a casualty. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Yes that is sudden enough, in my book. Yes you may amend your 2003 tax return, form 1040X. This may be downloaded from: irs.gov We had a lot of taxpayers that had losses in the flood of the Mississippi River in 1993. Lots of people lost everything. Missy Doyle << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU wrote: - quote - > "fermat" <damscot9[at]aol.com> wrote:
Thanks to everyone on this thread.> > We had extensive mold damage in 2003, but did not file a > > claim because our HO policy explicitly exlcudes coverage for > > mold damage. We paid contractors about $15k for necessary > > repairs in 2004. We thought this loss would not qualify by > > IRS rules since we failed to file an insurance claim, so we > > did not deduct it for 2003. But, after rethinking our > > situation, we are not sure where we stand. We now we wish to > > claim a casualty loss for this on our 2004 IRS return, if > > justified. What is your opinion? > You cannot deduct a 2003 loss on your 2004 return. I don't quite understand about the year though. I was not clear on my previous enquiry. I meant, "I wonder if we could ammend our 2003 return and claim the loss for that year, the year it happened?" Is it too late now? I thought we had three years. The mold damage did happen relatively quick, I believe, within about two weeks. Is that sudden enough? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Bill" <an_ordinary_guy_158[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > damscot9[at]aol.com (fermat) wrote:
I've had it TWICE in eight years.> > We had extensive mold damage in 2003, but > > did not file a claim because our HO policy > > explicitly exlcudes coverage for mold damage. > > We paid contractors about $15k for necessary > > repairs in 2004. We thought this loss would > > not qualify by IRS rules since we failed to file > > an insurance claim, so we did not deduct it for > > 2003. But, after rethinking our situation, we > > are not sure where we stand. We now we wish > > to claim a casualty loss for this on our 2004 > > IRS return, if justified. What is your opinion? > _Progressive deterioration_ is a specific category of > casualty loss which is cited in Pub 17 as an example of > _Nondeductible losses. See Chapter 27, Page 178, 2004 Pub > 17. > Aside from that, I've yet to find anyone who -- in the end, > after insurance partial-reimbursement and the 10% rule (Your > total net Casualty Loss must exceed 10% of AGI) -- met the > requirements for actually deducting something. That doesn't > mean it hasn't happened: It's just that in 14 years of > volunteer tax-prep, I've tried for a lot of deductions for > hail-damage, hurricane damage, etc., and _never_, not once, > have I been able to make an entry in that section of > Schedule A. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "fermat" <damscot9[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > We had extensive mold damage in 2003, but did not file a
You cannot deduct a 2003 loss on your 2004 return.> claim because our HO policy explicitly exlcudes coverage for > mold damage. We paid contractors about $15k for necessary > repairs in 2004. We thought this loss would not qualify by > IRS rules since we failed to file an insurance claim, so we > did not deduct it for 2003. But, after rethinking our > situation, we are not sure where we stand. We now we wish to > claim a casualty loss for this on our 2004 IRS return, if > justified. What is your opinion? -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "fermat" <damscot9[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > We had extensive mold damage in 2003, but did not file a
If it qualifies as a casualty loss, it has to be deducted in> claim because our HO policy explicitly exlcudes coverage for > mold damage. We paid contractors about $15k for necessary > repairs in 2004. We thought this loss would not qualify by > IRS rules since we failed to file an insurance claim, so we > did not deduct it for 2003. But, after rethinking our > situation, we are not sure where we stand. We now we wish to > claim a casualty loss for this on our 2004 IRS return, if > justified. What is your opinion? 2003, not 2004. -- Tom Healy, CPA Boulder, CO Web: http://www.tomhealycpa.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| damscot9[at]aol.com (fermat) wrote: - quote - > We had extensive mold damage in 2003, but
_Progressive deterioration_ is a specific category of> did not file a claim because our HO policy > explicitly exlcudes coverage for mold damage. > We paid contractors about $15k for necessary > repairs in 2004. We thought this loss would > not qualify by IRS rules since we failed to file > an insurance claim, so we did not deduct it for > 2003. But, after rethinking our situation, we > are not sure where we stand. We now we wish > to claim a casualty loss for this on our 2004 > IRS return, if justified. What is your opinion? casualty loss which is cited in Pub 17 as an example of _Nondeductible losses. See Chapter 27, Page 178, 2004 Pub 17. Aside from that, I've yet to find anyone who -- in the end, after insurance partial-reimbursement and the 10% rule (Your total net Casualty Loss must exceed 10% of AGI) -- met the requirements for actually deducting something. That doesn't mean it hasn't happened: It's just that in 14 years of volunteer tax-prep, I've tried for a lot of deductions for hail-damage, hurricane damage, etc., and _never_, not once, have I been able to make an entry in that section of Schedule A. Bill << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| The damage has to be sudden and this does not sound like it is sudden. Missy Doyle << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hello experts We had extensive mold damage in 2003, but did not file a claim because our HO policy explicitly exlcudes coverage for mold damage. We paid contractors about $15k for necessary repairs in 2004. We thought this loss would not qualify by IRS rules since we failed to file an insurance claim, so we did not deduct it for 2003. But, after rethinking our situation, we are not sure where we stand. We now we wish to claim a casualty loss for this on our 2004 IRS return, if justified. What is your opinion? Thanks << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| casualty, loss, qualifying |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Casualty Loss - Does this qualify? kc_wallace@yahoo.com: According to what I'm reading in the IRS publications, personal vehicle accidents are covered for casualty loss. However, the case I'm checking for... | Taxes | 10 | 02-13-2005 09:55 PM | |
| Embezzlement - Casualty Loss? SteveW: I am a 50% shareholder in an S-corp. The other shareholder recently died, and it was discovered he embezzled $80,000 from the business, all in... | Taxes | 7 | 10-04-2004 02:00 PM | |
| FSA for childcare - qualifying event for change? Susie ChaCha: My daughter attended childcare 1. Due to a medical condition, she needs to change to a different daycare (environmental smoke issue). This daycare... | Taxes | 2 | 04-02-2004 10:40 PM | |
| Re: Is this a valid casualty loss? Pistolesi: Take this scenario one step further ... here's aprx what happened to me last year : Car was totalled (rear ender). Existing note aprx $15,500.... | Taxes | 5 | 01-21-2004 12:11 PM | |
| Do I have a casualty loss? Cheryl: Do these facts indicate a casualty loss AND in what Year should it be reported - 2002 when the loss happened, or 2003 when I received the funds and... | Taxes | 3 | 11-09-2003 06:21 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |