|
#9
| |||
| |||
| The language of the codes had me confused. I am not divorced nor separated (in the legal sense) since I was never married to the mother. We are separated in the sense that we live in two different households. This is not the original link, but has the old information that I read somewhere and the correction at the top of the page, thanks for the reply. http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/irs.htm << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| J wrote: - quote - > Thanks for the cite and reply. I looked at the support test
I don't know where you are looking up the support test.> (5 questions) and it seemed I would be able to claim the > exception. This rule seems very abritrary, but I guess that > is what the IRS says, so I will have to deal with it. However, every reference document that I have from the IRS clearly has a notation that says if you are divorced or separated you need to read the support test for divorced and separated parents. That's where you will find a different general rule. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the reply Frederick. I think that maybe her husband is claiming the child against his income. He makes maybe 24000. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I asked a simple question and I am quite okay with the answer. There is no reason to judge me Phil or Phoebe << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the cite and reply. I looked at the support test (5 questions) and it seemed I would be able to claim the exception. This rule seems very abritrary, but I guess that is what the IRS says, so I will have to deal with it. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| J wrote: - quote - > I have a question that is confusing me.
<<SNIP> State guidelines are irrelevant to the issue of who gets a dependency exemption for the child on a federal income tax return. If unmarried parents TOGETHER provide over 1/2 the support of their child and TOGETHER have custody of their child for over 1/2 the year, then the parent with custody the greater part of the year gets the dependency exemption. From your facts, that parent is the child's mother. If the custodial parent fills out and signs IRS Form 8332, Release of Claim to Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents, giving the other parent the exemption, then and only then can the non-custodial parent claim the dependency exemption. To claim a dependency exemption for your child, you will have to persuade the mother to sign that form. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "J" <janderson_ishere[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > If I were to claim the exception, I am sure she will too. (It will be
It appears there is no question that you actually furnish> hard to work it out with her, she is not reasonable.) Would a copy of > the guidelines, outlining that I provide more than 50% of the support, > as determined by my state of residence, suffice as proof that I did > support the child more financially? > I have posted the info from the online support calculator below, it > seems if I make 60,000 per year, and she is assigned minimum wage, then > I am paying 84% of the total financial support of the child, as > determined by my state. > It seems it would be very hard for her to prove that she provided more > support with no income at all?! She could maybe argue that her husband > did, but I seriously doubt that, with child support of $613.56, he is > providing more than that. I mean $1227.08 is a ton of money to support > one child. I do not want to sound greedy, but it seems that I should > get the child tax credit, because I provide more financially. What do > you guys think? > Any replies will be very appreciated.... more than half of your child's support. However, because you are the noncustodial parent (NCP), the tax law awards the child's dependency exemption to the custodial parent (CP). The "Special Rule for Divorced and Separated Parents" says that as long as the child receives more than 50% of his support from one or both parents combined, that support is deemed to be provided by the CP. See the "Support Test for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents" on page 8 of IRS Publication 504. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p504.pdf In order for you to legally claim your child's dependency exemption, the mother must sign an IRS Form 8332 waiving her right to claim the child. You must attach a copy of the 8332 to your tax return. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8332.pdf If the child's mother earns as little as you say, she likely receives little or no tax benefit from claiming the child's dependency exemption. She probably claims earned income credit (EIC). However, she doesn't have to claim a dependency exemption for the child in order to qualify for EIC. This is a difficult concept for many low income taxpayers and if the other parent is as intractable as you say you will have difficult time convincing her to sign Form 8332. However, as I said above, that's the only way you legally can claim the child's dependency exemption. Frederick Lorca << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| J wrote: - quote - > it seems that an NCP who provides child support that, in
Unfortunately for you, the rule is that the custodial parent> total, is more than 50% of the total costs would be able > to claim the child. gets the exemption, unless they agree otherwise. Pub 504 explains the rule of divorced or separated parents, which IMHO applies to you under "1) c) Lived apart at all times during the last 6 months of the calendar year" rule. - quote - > there is no court order as to who can claim the child.
The IRS is indifferent to court orders. Even if there wereone, you'd still need your ex's signature on the Form 8332 or equivalent. - quote - > What do you guys think?
In order to remain on-charter, I'll limit my thoughts to: Ingeneral, the best time to consider the tax consequences of a transaction is before you engage in it. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "J" <janderson_ishere[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a question that is confusing me. I can easily predict that
And she'd be right, assuming that the child lives with her> I will always make quite a bit more money than my childs mothers. (Due > to education etc) We were never married. I live in a state that uses > income-share model of child support. In the formula, it provides for > the parent that has more income to pay a larger percentage of the > "costs" that are outlines by the Child Support Guidelines. I have read > the 5 tests, and it seems that an NCP who provides child support that, > in total, is more than 50% of the total costs would be able to claim > the child. In my situation, there is no court order as to who can claim > the child. Child Support can be very, very expensive for someone who > makes a high income (over $60,000) if the custodial parent is only > being assigned minimum wage (does not work, or part-time low wage > worker). She has gotten married also. I can predict that he will make > much less than me also (if it matters, due to education, etc). It does > not matter in the child support guidelines. > If I were to claim the exception, I am sure she will too. and the two of you didn't live together after 6/30/2004. See the Support rules in Publication 501 and you'll find that the custodial parent gets the exemption in this case. - quote - > (It will be hard to work it out with her, she is not reasonable.)
Sorry to be blunt, but the time to consider herreasonableness was when you had your pants on. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| J wrote: - quote - > I have a question that is confusing me. I can easily predict that
It doesn't matter how much you make nor how much you pay in child> I will always make quite a bit more money than my childs mothers. (Due > to education etc) We were never married. I live in a state that uses > income-share model of child support. In the formula, it provides for > the parent that has more income to pay a larger percentage of the > "costs" that are outlines by the Child Support Guidelines. I have read > the 5 tests, and it seems that an NCP who provides child support that, > in total, is more than 50% of the total costs would be able to claim > the child. In my situation, there is no court order as to who can claim > the child. Child Support can be very, very expensive for someone who > makes a high income (over $60,000) if the custodial parent is only > being assigned minimum wage (does not work, or part-time low wage > worker). She has gotten married also. I can predict that he will make > much less than me also (if it matters, due to education, etc). It does > not matter in the child support guidelines. > If I were to claim the exception, I am sure she will too. (It will be > hard to work it out with her, she is not reasonable.) Would a copy of > the guidelines, outlining that I provide more than 50% of the support, > as determined by my state of residence, suffice as proof that I did > support the child more financially? > I have posted the info from the online support calculator below, it > seems if I make 60,000 per year, and she is assigned minimum wage, then > I am paying 84% of the total financial support of the child, as > determined by my state. > It seems it would be very hard for her to prove that she provided more > support with no income at all?! She could maybe argue that her husband > did, but I seriously doubt that, with child support of $613.56, he is > providing more than that. I mean $1227.08 is a ton of money to support > one child. I do not want to sound greedy, but it seems that I should > get the child tax credit, because I provide more financially. What do > you guys think? > Any replies will be very appreciated.... > And now the guidelines.... > Calculation for Number of Children 1 > Obligor (non-custodial) is mother or father Father > Number of overnights with obligor 0 > BASE MONTHLY OBLIGATION FATHER MOTHER COMBINED > GROSS MONTHLY INCOME $5000.00 $900.00 $5900.00 > (all sources, except child support received and means-tested > public assistance) > 2 Less Court Ordered Optional Monthly Adjustment for Marital Debt > $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 > 3 Less Court Ordered Monthly Child Support and Support Alimony > actually paid (for others) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 > 4 ADJUSTED GROSS MONTHLY INCOME > (Line 1 (-) Line 2 and/or Line 3, if used)$5,000.00 $900.00 > $5,900.00 > 5 PERCENTAGE SHARE OF INCOME (Line 4 for each parent divided > by Line 4 Combined) 84.7% 15.3% 100% > 6 BASE MONTHLY OBLIGATION (apply Line 4 Combined to Child Support > Schedule and insert in Line 6 Combined Then Line 6 Combined X Line 5 > for each parent.) $613.56 $110.44 $724.00 > B SHARED PARENTING ADJUSTMENT (if used) > 7 NUMBER OF OVERNIGHTS WITH EACH PARENT > (If less than 121 for non-custodian, skip to C) > 0 365 365 > 8 PERCENTAGE WITH EACH PARENT > (Line 7 for each parent divided by line 7 Combined) > 0.0% 100.0% 100% > 9 SHARED PARENTING BASE OBLIGATION > (Line 6 Combined X 1.5) > 10 EACH PARENT'S SHARE > (Line 9 Combined X Line 5 for each parent) > 11 AMOUNT RETAINED BY EACH PARENT > (Line 10 for each parent X Line 8 for each parent) > 12 OFFSET AMOUNT > (Line 10 (-) 11 for each parent) > 13 ADJUSTED BASE MONTHLY OBLIGATION > (Subtract smaller amount from larger amount on line 12. If obligee > amount is larger than obligor amount, enter $0 for obligor.)*** > $613.56 $110.44 $724.00 > C HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM > 14 MONTHLY HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM > (Actual monthly premium amount for each parent, for children included > in this calculation.) > If none, enter $0 and skip to Line 17. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 > 15 MONTHLY HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM SHARE > (Line 14 combined premium amount X Line 5 for each parent) $0.00 > $0.00 > 16 ADJUSTED PREMIUM SHARE paid by obligor (Leave obligee amount blank. > Subtract obligor line 14 from obligor line 15. Amount may be negative.) > $0.00 > D WORK AND EDUCATION RELATED CHILD CARE EXPENSES > 17 MONTHLY CHILD CARE EXPENSES for each parent, for children included > in this calculation (Skip to line 18 if Oklahoma DHS Child Care Subsidy > case). $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 > 18 OKLAHOMA DHS CHILD CARE SUBSIDY > (line 18f X line 18b / line 18a) > a. Total children in obligee's child care subsidy case > b. Number of children of these parents in obligee's child care > subsidy case > c. Obligee's actual gross monthly income > d. Obligor's base monthly obligation amount > e. Amount treated as obligee's DHS household income > (line 18c + line 18d) > f. Amount treated as obligee's family share co-payment from the > OKDHS Appendix C-4 (Rev. 9/1/04) > 19 CHILD CARE EXPENSE SHARE > (Line 17 combined or obligee line 18, X line 5 for each parent) $0.00 > $0.00 > 20 ADJUSTED CHILD CARE CONTRIBUTION paid by obligor (Leave obligee > amount blank. Subtract obligor line 17 or 18 from obligor line 19. > Amount may be negative.) $0.00 > 21 TOTAL MONTHLY CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION > [Add obligor's Line 6 or Line 13 and Lines 16 and 20 (if positive > amounts). Subtract Lines 16 and 20 (if negative amounts) from obligor's > Line 6 or Line 13.] > $613.56 > E OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS, IF AGREED or ORDERED FATHER MOTHER > COMBINED > 22 RECURRING MONTHLY MEDICAL EXPENSES > (Line 22 Combined X Line 5 for each parent) $0.00 $0.00 > $0.00 > 23 OTHER MEDICAL EXPENSES PERCENTAGE SHARE (Line 5) 84.7% 15.3% > 24 VISITATION TRANSPORTATION COSTS > (Line 24 Combined X Line 5 for each parent) $0.00 $0.00 > $0.00 support. The custodial parent is deemed to have provided over one-half of the support for the child for the calendar year. (Internal Revenue Code Sec. 152(e)) The only way for you to claim an exemption for the child is for the custodial parent to release the exemption to you. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a question that is confusing me. I can easily predict that I will always make quite a bit more money than my childs mothers. (Due to education etc) We were never married. I live in a state that uses income-share model of child support. In the formula, it provides for the parent that has more income to pay a larger percentage of the "costs" that are outlines by the Child Support Guidelines. I have read the 5 tests, and it seems that an NCP who provides child support that, in total, is more than 50% of the total costs would be able to claim the child. In my situation, there is no court order as to who can claim the child. Child Support can be very, very expensive for someone who makes a high income (over $60,000) if the custodial parent is only being assigned minimum wage (does not work, or part-time low wage worker). She has gotten married also. I can predict that he will make much less than me also (if it matters, due to education, etc). It does not matter in the child support guidelines. If I were to claim the exception, I am sure she will too. (It will be hard to work it out with her, she is not reasonable.) Would a copy of the guidelines, outlining that I provide more than 50% of the support, as determined by my state of residence, suffice as proof that I did support the child more financially? I have posted the info from the online support calculator below, it seems if I make 60,000 per year, and she is assigned minimum wage, then I am paying 84% of the total financial support of the child, as determined by my state. It seems it would be very hard for her to prove that she provided more support with no income at all?! She could maybe argue that her husband did, but I seriously doubt that, with child support of $613.56, he is providing more than that. I mean $1227.08 is a ton of money to support one child. I do not want to sound greedy, but it seems that I should get the child tax credit, because I provide more financially. What do you guys think? Any replies will be very appreciated.... And now the guidelines.... Calculation for Number of Children 1 Obligor (non-custodial) is mother or father Father Number of overnights with obligor 0 BASE MONTHLY OBLIGATION FATHER MOTHER COMBINED GROSS MONTHLY INCOME $5000.00 $900.00 $5900.00 (all sources, except child support received and means-tested public assistance) 2 Less Court Ordered Optional Monthly Adjustment for Marital Debt $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3 Less Court Ordered Monthly Child Support and Support Alimony actually paid (for others) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 4 ADJUSTED GROSS MONTHLY INCOME (Line 1 (-) Line 2 and/or Line 3, if used)$5,000.00 $900.00 $5,900.00 5 PERCENTAGE SHARE OF INCOME (Line 4 for each parent divided by Line 4 Combined) 84.7% 15.3% 100% 6 BASE MONTHLY OBLIGATION (apply Line 4 Combined to Child Support Schedule and insert in Line 6 Combined Then Line 6 Combined X Line 5 for each parent.) $613.56 $110.44 $724.00 B SHARED PARENTING ADJUSTMENT (if used) 7 NUMBER OF OVERNIGHTS WITH EACH PARENT (If less than 121 for non-custodian, skip to C) 0 365 365 8 PERCENTAGE WITH EACH PARENT (Line 7 for each parent divided by line 7 Combined) 0.0% 100.0% 100% 9 SHARED PARENTING BASE OBLIGATION (Line 6 Combined X 1.5) 10 EACH PARENT'S SHARE (Line 9 Combined X Line 5 for each parent) 11 AMOUNT RETAINED BY EACH PARENT (Line 10 for each parent X Line 8 for each parent) 12 OFFSET AMOUNT (Line 10 (-) 11 for each parent) 13 ADJUSTED BASE MONTHLY OBLIGATION (Subtract smaller amount from larger amount on line 12. If obligee amount is larger than obligor amount, enter $0 for obligor.)*** $613.56 $110.44 $724.00 C HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 14 MONTHLY HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM (Actual monthly premium amount for each parent, for children included in this calculation.) If none, enter $0 and skip to Line 17. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 15 MONTHLY HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM SHARE (Line 14 combined premium amount X Line 5 for each parent) $0.00 $0.00 16 ADJUSTED PREMIUM SHARE paid by obligor (Leave obligee amount blank. Subtract obligor line 14 from obligor line 15. Amount may be negative.) $0.00 D WORK AND EDUCATION RELATED CHILD CARE EXPENSES 17 MONTHLY CHILD CARE EXPENSES for each parent, for children included in this calculation (Skip to line 18 if Oklahoma DHS Child Care Subsidy case). $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 18 OKLAHOMA DHS CHILD CARE SUBSIDY (line 18f X line 18b / line 18a) a. Total children in obligee's child care subsidy case b. Number of children of these parents in obligee's child care subsidy case c. Obligee's actual gross monthly income d. Obligor's base monthly obligation amount e. Amount treated as obligee's DHS household income (line 18c + line 18d) f. Amount treated as obligee's family share co-payment from the OKDHS Appendix C-4 (Rev. 9/1/04) 19 CHILD CARE EXPENSE SHARE (Line 17 combined or obligee line 18, X line 5 for each parent) $0.00 $0.00 20 ADJUSTED CHILD CARE CONTRIBUTION paid by obligor (Leave obligee amount blank. Subtract obligor line 17 or 18 from obligor line 19. Amount may be negative.) $0.00 21 TOTAL MONTHLY CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION [Add obligor's Line 6 or Line 13 and Lines 16 and 20 (if positive amounts). Subtract Lines 16 and 20 (if negative amounts) from obligor's Line 6 or Line 13.] $613.56 E OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS, IF AGREED or ORDERED FATHER MOTHER COMBINED 22 RECURRING MONTHLY MEDICAL EXPENSES (Line 22 Combined X Line 5 for each parent) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 23 OTHER MEDICAL EXPENSES PERCENTAGE SHARE (Line 5) 84.7% 15.3% 24 VISITATION TRANSPORTATION COSTS (Line 24 Combined X Line 5 for each parent) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| child, claim, noncustodial, parent, situation |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Custodial Fees Kyle Haeussler: My Investment company currently does not offer downloads into Microsoft Money so I'm left to not tracking my investments or entering them manually. ... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 05-02-2007 05:37 AM | |
| Supporting Parent - claim on taxes Jawahar Rajan: Need some advice, I am supporting my parent in Canada, by sending them some money each month. Am I able to claim this on my Taxes as a donation... | Taxes | 15 | 02-09-2005 04:14 AM | |
| Tax ramifications - parent adding child to home title? Plin321: My father recently added me name to the title on a house in CA, so now it it under his and my name. My mom passed away a few years ago and the... | Taxes | 7 | 11-23-2004 04:56 PM | |
| custodial exemption BILLW: My brother was awarded custody(with no child support) of his 10 yr. old daughter and has lived with him for 2 years, in 2003, his daughter lived... | Taxes | 19 | 02-22-2004 05:40 AM | |
| Child Tax Credit advance check for deceased child Matthew Seitz: My only child died in 2002. I received a 2003 Child Tax Credit advance check. What should I do with the check? <<... | Taxes | 8 | 08-17-2003 03:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |