| | |||
| |||
| "Google Groups" <goorgle[at]hotmail.com> wrote - quote - > A father and son are planning to buy a "fixer upper" home
Look at a partnership, that pays the dad "Guaranteed> which they're going to rehab and sell (flip) at a higher > price, and split the profits. > The son is in a high tax bracket and the father is > unemployed (0% bracket). The son is going to provide all the > financing and pay for the father's living expenses during > the project. > What is the best way to structure the deal to minimize taxes? Payments" that are income to the dad, and an expense of the partnership/ This shifts income more to the dad, who is in a lower tax bracket. - quote - > Some options we've been considering:
No, they will be regular income, as that is the business> -1- Sole Proprietorship owned by the son. SP pays salary to > father for living expenses. Profits would flow through as > capital gains to the son. activity. The homes are not capital in nature. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A father and son are planning to buy a "fixer upper" home which they're going to rehab and sell (flip) at a higher price, and split the profits. The son is in a high tax bracket and the father is unemployed (0% bracket). The son is going to provide all the financing and pay for the father's living expenses during the project. What is the best way to structure the deal to minimize taxes? Some options we've been considering: -1- Sole Proprietorship owned by the son. SP pays salary to father for living expenses. Profits would flow through as capital gains to the son. Father's share of profit would be paid by SP as a salary bonus (deductible in the son's return). -2- Sole Proprietorship owned by the father and funded by a loan from the son. Father lives off loan during project. Profits show up as capital gains on the father's return. Son's share of profits would be paid partially by the father's SP as interest on the loan, and the remaining as a non-taxable gift from the father. Son's return never sees the Capital Gains. -3- Partnership, LLC, or S Corp owned 50/50 by the son & father, funded either by a loan or capital contribution from the son. Entity would pay salary to father for living expenses. Profits show up as capital gains on both returns. Is there anything we're missing here or any special IRS rules which could make one of these options a Bad Idea? Thanks. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| business, home, rehabbing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Home Business and Selling Your Home amyl@paxemail.com: I develop software out of my home as a home based business. I have only had my home since July of this year. From the research I have done I can... | Taxes | 9 | 02-10-2005 06:49 AM | |
| 1031 Exchanges and rehabbing Joseph Aaron Tank: If your business is home rehabbing, can you use 1031 exchanges when you sell a rehabbed property and buy a new project in order to defer paying... | Taxes | 3 | 02-04-2004 03:13 AM | |
| Money 2003 for Business vs. Quicken home and Business? kdnms: Trying to find out from someone who has used both, if the Money for business software offers better features than Quicken Home & Business? | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-21-2003 12:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |