|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > "David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU" <dwoods[at]woods-financial.com> wrote:
Ya think?> > "bclee05[at]gmail.com" <bclee05[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > > My wife's sister is selling her condo. Her parents helped > > > her buy the place and put the condo in her name and my wifes > > > name with the understanding that when she eventually sold > > > the place my wife would get half of the profit from sale of > > > the home. > > > > > The condo will probably sell for 400K w/ 100K left on the > > > mortgage. Thus my wife and her sister should each get 150K > > > each. > > > > > What is the best strategy to reduce tax liability here? > > Sell for less > Well, wife could go live in the place for the next two years > so that the shares of both sisters would be exempt up to > $250,000 each. But I'd guess that's impractical. - quote - > > > Another idea is for my wife's sister to hold on to the first
You know that and I know that but....> > > 250K (my understanding is that the first 250K is tax free) > > > and then pay my wife 11K and me 11K each year until my > > > wifes' portion is paid out. One is allowed to receive 11K > > > in gifts tax free, yes? > > Gifts are never income no matter how much. > But in this case it wouldn't be a gift. It would only look > like one. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU" <dwoods[at]woods-financial.com> wrote: - quote - > "bclee05[at]gmail.com" <bclee05[at]gmail.com> wrote:
Well, wife could go live in the place for the next two years> > My wife's sister is selling her condo. Her parents helped > > her buy the place and put the condo in her name and my wifes > > name with the understanding that when she eventually sold > > the place my wife would get half of the profit from sale of > > the home. > > > The condo will probably sell for 400K w/ 100K left on the > > mortgage. Thus my wife and her sister should each get 150K > > each. > > > What is the best strategy to reduce tax liability here? > Sell for less so that the shares of both sisters would be exempt up to $250,000 each. But I'd guess that's impractical. - quote - > > Another idea is for my wife's sister to hold on to the first
But in this case it wouldn't be a gift. It would only look> > 250K (my understanding is that the first 250K is tax free) > > and then pay my wife 11K and me 11K each year until my > > wifes' portion is paid out. One is allowed to receive 11K > > in gifts tax free, yes? > Gifts are never income no matter how much. like one. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <bclee05[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > My wife's sister is selling her condo. Her parents helped
From the facts you state, the condo is owned 50/50 by the> her buy the place and put the condo in her name and my wifes > name with the understanding that when she eventually sold > the place my wife would get half of the profit from sale of > the home. > The condo will probably sell for 400K w/ 100K left on the > mortgage. Thus my wife and her sister should each get 150K > each. > What is the best strategy to reduce tax liability here? > My understanding is that my wife's portion will be taxed as > regular income. Is there anyway to reduce it? One of my > relatives says we should roll it into some other property. > Another idea is for my wife's sister to hold on to the first > 250K (my understanding is that the first 250K is tax free) > and then pay my wife 11K and me 11K each year until my > wifes' portion is paid out. One is allowed to receive 11K > in gifts tax free, yes? Could we include our son in the 11K > payments too? Is this overly complicated? sisters. Apparently your sister-in-law has lived in the condo for at least 2 years. If so, she can benefit from the exempted gain on HER HALF of the condo. So the max (if basis was zero) that could be exempted by the sister is 200,000. The actual gain basis for each half is likely different if the parents paid a part, then the sister-in-law paid the mortgage payments. I would advise you to get professional help on this. What you pay him/her will keep you out of trouble with the IRS. Mike Lewis, CPA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "bclee05[at]gmail.com" <bclee05[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > My wife's sister is selling her condo. Her parents helped
Sell for less> her buy the place and put the condo in her name and my wifes > name with the understanding that when she eventually sold > the place my wife would get half of the profit from sale of > the home. > The condo will probably sell for 400K w/ 100K left on the > mortgage. Thus my wife and her sister should each get 150K > each. > What is the best strategy to reduce tax liability here? - quote - > My understanding is that my wife's portion will be taxed as
It's cap gain.> regular income. - quote - > Is there anyway to reduce it? One of my
Your relative should stick to their day job and leave giving> relatives says we should roll it into some other property. tax advice to the professionals. - quote - > Another idea is for my wife's sister to hold on to the first
Gifts are never income no matter how much.> 250K (my understanding is that the first 250K is tax free) > and then pay my wife 11K and me 11K each year until my > wifes' portion is paid out. One is allowed to receive 11K > in gifts tax free, yes? - quote - > Could we include our son in the 11K
Yes. Your wife is taxed on her share of the profit.> payments too? Is this overly complicated? Period. Who gifts what to whom doesn't change that. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My wife's sister is selling her condo. Her parents helped her buy the place and put the condo in her name and my wifes name with the understanding that when she eventually sold the place my wife would get half of the profit from sale of the home. The condo will probably sell for 400K w/ 100K left on the mortgage. Thus my wife and her sister should each get 150K each. What is the best strategy to reduce tax liability here? My understanding is that my wife's portion will be taxed as regular income. Is there anyway to reduce it? One of my relatives says we should roll it into some other property. Another idea is for my wife's sister to hold on to the first 250K (my understanding is that the first 250K is tax free) and then pay my wife 11K and me 11K each year until my wifes' portion is paid out. One is allowed to receive 11K in gifts tax free, yes? Could we include our son in the 11K payments too? Is this overly complicated? thanks, bill << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| jointly, owned, property, sales, strategy |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Cost Basis for jointly held real estate Admiral Addison: I am considering jointly purchasing a condo with my father, with each of us owning 50% of the condo. The condo would be paid for in cash and would... | Taxes | 2 | 06-27-2004 08:27 PM | |
| Which type of property ownership best-serves to protect a property from creditors? IOUERG: Questions: We are in California, and filling up a buyer's escrow information sheet. Which type of ownership is the best to protect a property from... | Taxes | 3 | 05-14-2004 01:29 AM | |
| Basis step-up on inherited jointly owned property at first death? AES/newspost: My amateur understanding is that in community property states such as California, property that is jointly owned by a married couple receives a... | Taxes | 15 | 11-12-2003 04:16 PM | |
| Passive losses; LLC-owned rental property David Haffey: Individual owns 50% of LLC (1065). LLC owns several rental properties. Individual has unused passive activity losses from prior years as a result... | Taxes | 2 | 09-14-2003 11:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |