| | |||
| |||
| Chris wrote: - quote - > I have two related questions on CA VPDI benefits, but much
(update) Ignore the last sentence about "like SDI" (more> of the 2nd depends on the answer to the first. Here it > goes... > 1. My wife paid into her company's VPDI instead of CA SDI. > She then received $775 in benefits. Since this is VPDI > instead of SDI paying this amount, is this amount taxable > both to the federal and CA governments? Is it like SDI in > which it's federally taxed, but not state taxed? below). However, the rest of the paragraph I'm hoping someone will answer. - quote - > 2. Actually, there's a bit more to #1 above. By a mixup in
(update) Some confusion on my part that I'd like to clarify.> her company's claim processing, she was told to file with > the state for the benefits. The $775 actually came from the > state and we received a 2004 1099-G from CA for this amount. The mixup wasn't that my wife filed for state SDI benefits, but rather California's "paid family leave extension" which is treated as unemployment income and thus taxable (by the IRS, not CA). She was supposed to file for VPDI. If anyone is taking on this question, please consider this info instead going forward. Thank you. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have two related questions on CA VPDI benefits, but much of the 2nd depends on the answer to the first. Here it goes... 1. My wife paid into her company's VPDI instead of CA SDI. She then received $775 in benefits. Since this is VPDI instead of SDI paying this amount, is this amount taxable both to the federal and CA governments? Is it like SDI in which it's federally taxed, but not state taxed? 2. Actually, there's a bit more to #1 above. By a mixup in her company's claim processing, she was told to file with the state for the benefits. The $775 actually came from the state and we received a 2004 1099-G from CA for this amount. In February 2005, the state contacted both my wife and her company about the mixup and the resolution was that her company would reimburse the state for that amount, in essence taking over the payout claim. Assuming there is a *difference* between how SDI and VPDI benefits are taxed (answer to #1 above), how would this be handled tax-wise, considering: a. The state paid the benefit in 2004. b. The state is getting its money back in 2005. c. The company is paying the benefit in 2005. Would we: d. Get the state to revoke its (or issue a revised) 2004 1099-G and get the equivalent 2004 VPDI benefits tax form, or e. Keep the 2004 state 1099-G, get a new one for 2005 that revokes this amount and get a 2005 VPDI benefits tax form. Regards, Chris << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| benefits, taxable, vpdi |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| California VPDI vs SDI deductability Josh M.: I've seen a lot of debate on this topic over the years--not to rehash the whole debate (search google for "VPDI SDI" for more), but I work in CA... | Taxes | 3 | 02-10-2004 07:26 PM | |
| Re: CA-VPDI Katie Jaques: "Vernon Chatman" <vernonchatmaniii@earthlink.net> wrote: snip >> Anyway, I don't think "voluntary" is the key here; I think >> the key concept... | Taxes | 9 | 07-23-2003 12:56 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |