|
#3
| |||
| |||
| The IRS does not care which years you claim the exemption, and which years your ex claim the exemption, just as long as you don't both claim the exemption in the same tax year. Any arguments about who claim the exemption in any given year would fall under the jurisdiction of the court that approved and enforces the custodial agreement. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| taxhelpneeded <mcseans[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a situation where the mother of our child has the
The custodial parent is the one who claims the child, unless> legal right to claim him on the 2004 taxes. We are not > together and never were married. In our custodial legal > forms, she is allowed to claim him every 5th tax year and I > have the rest. She did not make enough money in 2004 to > claim him and has asked if I want to claim him (via form > 8332 as usual) for 2004, in return for my relinquishing the > tax deduction for 2005 to her. This seems to make sense > because if I do not claim him then noone can, although I am > wondering about any legal ramifications or irs red flags > that this may encounter? If I choose not to claim him for > 2004 then legally I can continue to claim him for the next 4 > years. the custodial parent signs away that right on Form 8332. A very recent change pretty much elimiates most court orders which grant the noncustodial parent rights to claim the dependency exemption. A court order that is not equivalent to a Form 8332, including the signature of the custodial parent and SSNs of each party, is no longer acceptable to the IRS. The IRS doesn't care if a child is claimed or not, so long as the child is not claimed more than once. If claimed, the rules for claiming a dependency allowance have to be followed. I didn't read in your answer just who is the custodial parent, so I have used the term custodial parent here. I don't see much in the way of red flags if you trade years, though the state court might frown in that. - quote - > I also wonder what happens when no one claims a young
__> child, does the IRS just not care? Any help is appreciated. Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| taxhelpneeded wrote: - quote - > I have a situation where the mother of our child has the
Somebody once said that IRS don't care one whit about any body.> legal right to claim him on the 2004 taxes. We are not > together and never were married. In our custodial legal > forms, she is allowed to claim him every 5th tax year and I > have the rest. She did not make enough money in 2004 to > claim him and has asked if I want to claim him (via form > 8332 as usual) for 2004, in return for my relinquishing the > tax deduction for 2005 to her. This seems to make sense > because if I do not claim him then noone can, although I am > wondering about any legal ramifications or irs red flags > that this may encounter? If I choose not to claim him for > 2004 then legally I can continue to claim him for the next 4 > years. I also wonder what happens when no one claims a young > child, does the IRS just not care? Any help is appreciated. And in this case, it's right. They WILL care however when two (or more) try to claim the same kid. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Wed 23 Feb 2005 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "taxhelpneeded" <mcseans[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a situation where the mother of our child has the
None> legal right to claim him on the 2004 taxes. We are not > together and never were married. In our custodial legal > forms, she is allowed to claim him every 5th tax year and I > have the rest. She did not make enough money in 2004 to > claim him and has asked if I want to claim him (via form > 8332 as usual) for 2004, in return for my relinquishing the > tax deduction for 2005 to her. This seems to make sense > because if I do not claim him then noone can, although I am > wondering about any legal ramifications or irs red flags > that this may encounter? - quote - > If I choose not to claim him for
They couldn't care less. They're too busy dealing with the> 2004 then legally I can continue to claim him for the next 4 > years. > From a tax law perspective there's no problem. > I also wonder what happens when no one claims a young > child, does the IRS just not care? ones who are claimed more than once. -- Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a situation where the mother of our child has the legal right to claim him on the 2004 taxes. We are not together and never were married. In our custodial legal forms, she is allowed to claim him every 5th tax year and I have the rest. She did not make enough money in 2004 to claim him and has asked if I want to claim him (via form 8332 as usual) for 2004, in return for my relinquishing the tax deduction for 2005 to her. This seems to make sense because if I do not claim him then noone can, although I am wondering about any legal ramifications or irs red flags that this may encounter? If I choose not to claim him for 2004 then legally I can continue to claim him for the next 4 years. I also wonder what happens when no one claims a young child, does the IRS just not care? Any help is appreciated. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 8332, question, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Form 8332 Mr B: Parents of a child were never married and have lived apart for the entire year. The child lives with the Mother but is with the Father the... | Taxes | 5 | 01-15-2004 04:45 AM | |
| Tax Court Decides that 8332 for parents never wedded to each other Ed Zollars, CPA: The Tax Court, in published opinion resolving an ambiguity in the law that the IRS had issued somewhat inconsistent internal guidance on, has ruled... | Taxes | 22 | 10-22-2003 11:20 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |