|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Folks, Adding to my post to be able to give a blanket Thank You! for all your encouraging and informative replies. Truly exceeded my expectations. To answer Marko's specific question: Yes, looking for a career change, and was about to be displaced. It appears I may "have to" continue on in a different job here, but it pays the bills. Meanwhile, I still have a keen interest in personal finance (I feel it is made-for-me kind of work) and all your case studies have given me increased motivation in that direction. It's a matter of timing... - Casey << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| CB <temp1[at]tomochka.com> wrote: - quote - > Someone
Not at all. I don't have a master's, I studied in my spare> - of above average intelligence (Masters degree in technical > field). > - with practical familiarity with individual tax preparation > (but never employed as a preparer). IOW, has general > awareness of what they are getting into. > - who can spend six months full-time (40+ hrs/wk) to study > all pubs and forms and past test Q&A (assuming SEE held in > Sept.) > - who is highly motivated with an aptitude for an arcane > labyrinth of rules, regulations, and conditional scenarios. ![]() > What it boils down to is the assessment of tax professionals > who understand the actual *volume* of material that must be > digested and learned. Is it too much to learn in six months? time while working a full-time job, and passed parts 1, 3 and 4. While I had dealt with many of the topics covered by part 1 for years, I had no experience with the topics covered by the other parts until I began studying a couple of months prior to the exam. The Gleim books recommend a study schedule, which I can't remember right now but is much less than 40 hours a week for six months. I set it up for seomthing like 12 hours a week for two or three months but circumstances conspired to allow me to study only a fraction of that time. I'm fully convinced that had I been able to follow the recommended study schedule I would have passed all four parts. If you go with the Gleim self-study course, you can get either books or software or both. I got both and would recommend that. Lee Choquette << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| No, its not unreasonable at all. With a full-time schedule to devote to it, you can probably do it in 2 months, in fact. That is, if you use a self-study program. Do a google search and you'll find several of them available on the market. Getting the credential is one thing, but what do you plan to do with it career-wise? Have you decided to leave the technical field wherein you received your masters degree or have you just been displaced/offshored by Indians? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "CB" <temp1[at]tomochka.com> wrote in - quote - > Someone
Well, CB, if you really want to do it, you certainly can.> - of above average intelligence (Masters degree in technical > field). > - with practical familiarity with individual tax preparation > (but never employed as a preparer). IOW, has general > awareness of what they are getting into. > - who can spend six months full-time (40+ hrs/wk) to study > all pubs and forms and past test Q&A (assuming SEE held in > Sept.) > - who is highly motivated with an aptitude for an arcane > labyrinth of rules, regulations, and conditional scenarios. ![]() > What it boils down to is the assessment of tax professionals > who understand the actual *volume* of material that must be > digested and learned. Is it too much to learn in six months? My degree is in earth and materials sciences, but put myself through college doing bookkeeping. Worked as an engineer for a dozen years. Ended up going back to finance for long boring reasons. I've been an accounting consultant, worked for a bit in a CPA office, taught bookkeeping and basic accounting at a junior college for a while, and have done taxes professionally for years. Never heard of the EA designation until December of 2003 (too busy keeping my nose to the grindstone) at a tax seminar. In mid-July of '04 I signed up for the SEE. Ordered study materials (I used Gleim) in August. Spent _four_ weeks studying like some endless night-before-finals nightmare. Passed all four parts, first try, with comfortable margins. I've done endless 1040's, schedules a through e, did some partnership stuff (up to K-1 prep) twice 8 years ago, helped with some small corporate returns 12 years ago. So if you're motivated, go for it. Good luck. Catherine << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "CB" <temp1[at]tomochka.com> wrote: - quote - > Someone
That is not too much to learn in six months if you go about> - of above average intelligence (Masters degree in technical > field). > - with practical familiarity with individual tax preparation > (but never employed as a preparer). IOW, has general > awareness of what they are getting into. > - who can spend six months full-time (40+ hrs/wk) to study > all pubs and forms and past test Q&A (assuming SEE held in > Sept.) > - who is highly motivated with an aptitude for an arcane > labyrinth of rules, regulations, and conditional scenarios. ![]() > What it boils down to is the assessment of tax professionals > who understand the actual *volume* of material that must be > digested and learned. Is it too much to learn in six months? the study in the right way. Get copies of the past exams from http://www.irs.gov. Look closely at the questions given every other year. Wayne Brasch, CPA, M. S. Taxation << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| CB wrote: - quote - > Is it too much to learn in six months?
I learned it in more like 3, but I had the advantage ofhaving someone I could ask questions of for the stuff I had no clue about (like C-corporation tax; when I passed, I'd never done a C-corp return). When I passed in 1998, I had one tax season of experience, most of which was spent doing the initial data entry for individual returns. I started studying in July / August. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Something else: Joke #1: Up to and after the exam, I said: "Hey, I know everything there is to know about federal taxes...as long as you ask me in three statements and a question, with four answer choices, 3 of which are wrong!" Joke #2: What do they call the guy who was the worst student in class, in the lab, in practicals, in every part of his education, and who graduated from med school at the very rock bottom of his class? Answer: Doctor. It's not about "digested and learned." It's about getting a passing score on the SEE, if you see what I mean? <grin Rob Nyberg, again << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| From my personal experience last year, the answer is definitely yes. I began in earnest in June for the Sept. exam. I took a coaching course thru the Plano (TX) Area Enrolled Agents that met every Saturday all day for 10 Saturdays before the exam. Just before that I took a coaching course thru the DFW Area Chapter of Enrolled Agents. Both courses used instructional software by Gleim (www.gleim.com). There are other good software packages out there. The keys to my passing all four parts were: 1. The obligation to show up prepared to the course. All the other students I've stayed in touch with also passed all four parts, so the courses do work well, if you're committed to doing the work. 2. Interaction with instructors and other students in the course and via email. 3. Focus on property (basis) questions. 4. Answering test questions. During Sept. I answered about 200 questions/day up to the day before the exam. 5. My wife's total support at home, and support at work. (I could work on the SEE as much as I needed). I was able to work, study, eat, sleep. I spent 3 hours daily M-F, 6 hours in class on Sat. 6 hours answering questions (study) on Sun. The SEE was the second most difficult exam I've ever taken. I did not read the pubs much at all; however, a friend in Austin read all the relevant pubs over the Summer, did not take a course, and she also passed all four parts the first time. If you read the pubs, you will see examples just like the questions asked on the SEE. It is not too much to learn in six months. I'm far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but I can persevere. Rob Nyberg, DPM, EA (almost)(waiting for the T-card....) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Someone
MSEE, MBA, worked for Block for two seasons part time (which> - of above average intelligence (Masters degree in technical > field). > - with practical familiarity with individual tax preparation > (but never employed as a preparer). IOW, has general > awareness of what they are getting into. > - who can spend six months full-time (40+ hrs/wk) to study > all pubs and forms and past test Q&A (assuming SEE held in > Sept.) > - who is highly motivated with an aptitude for an arcane > labyrinth of rules, regulations, and conditional scenarios. ![]() had very little effect on my test taking knowledge), took the Thomas course, spent the better part of the summer doing the problems - passed all four parts first time. -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > Someone
Whenever a question like this arises, I have the same answer.> - of above average intelligence (Masters degree in technical > field). > - with practical familiarity with individual tax preparation > (but never employed as a preparer). IOW, has general > awareness of what they are getting into. > - who can spend six months full-time (40+ hrs/wk) to study > all pubs and forms and past test Q&A (assuming SEE held in > Sept.) > - who is highly motivated with an aptitude for an arcane > labyrinth of rules, regulations, and conditional scenarios. ![]() I used MicroMash software and TotalTape audio cassettes to pass all four parts of the CPA exam in one sitting. Susan, the mother of my sons, passed parts I & 2 of the Certified internal auditor exam in the first sitting and part 3 on the second sitting. She passed part 4 in the fourth sitting after I got her a copy of MicroMash CIA review for part 4. I am unfamiliar with programs offered by either Thomas or Gliem and I do not know if MicroMash or TotalTape have review courses for Enrolled Agents. But they are worth checking out. TotalTape (Bisk Publishing) gave 100 to 150 copies of their previous year's CPA Review books to the University of Baltimore while I was a Professor there. Several students said the books alone were enough to study and pass all four parts. Dick << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Someone - of above average intelligence (Masters degree in technical field). - with practical familiarity with individual tax preparation (but never employed as a preparer). IOW, has general awareness of what they are getting into. - who can spend six months full-time (40+ hrs/wk) to study all pubs and forms and past test Q&A (assuming SEE held in Sept.) - who is highly motivated with an aptitude for an arcane labyrinth of rules, regulations, and conditional scenarios. ![]() What it boils down to is the assessment of tax professionals who understand the actual *volume* of material that must be digested and learned. Is it too much to learn in six months? TIA - CB << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| goal, obtain, reasonable, status, year |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How to obtain a certain order in categories, accounts... Henrik: I like to have my income and expense categories, accounts etc. appear in a specific order based on how I like to review my financials rather than as... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 03-17-2007 01:47 PM | |
| Tax Question - Switched from employee to sub-contractor status mid-year... Peter Gibbons: I have a few tax-related questions that I'm hoping someone can give me some information on. Let me give you some background information first: ... | Taxes | 3 | 11-06-2004 11:19 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |