|
#1
| |||
| |||
| robnyberg[at]sbcglobal.net wrote: - quote - > I understand the concept of netting, but I've not done this
I have done this for broker-affiliated clients many times> before, and I want to know what potential problems anyone > sees in this manoeuver? and have yet to encounter a problem. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| <robnyberg[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote: - quote - > I sell insurance through a 2-member LLC that reports
Basically, this is how its done. Most insurance agencies> federally on a 1065. > I got a 1099 made out to my SSN instead of the business FEIN. > I questioned the agency's accountant, who emailed back: "If > you are paying your commissions to the entity, all you have > to do on your personal return is to file a Schedule C that > shows the income amount from the 1099. On the miscellaneous > expense line, show nominee payments to the entity and list > its EIN#. Thus, you are netting your amount to 0, and all > the income is in the entity." > I understand the concept of netting, but I've not done this > before, and I want to know what potential problems anyone > sees in this manoeuver? and broker/dealers won't issue a 1099 to an entity UNLESS all the members of the entity are duly licensed/appointed/affiliated with the agency or B/D. Technically, this is NOT netting. Netting is where you report the net amount. What this does is report the income and the assignment separately. You should have no problem. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I sell insurance through a 2-member LLC that reports federally on a 1065. I got a 1099 made out to my SSN instead of the business FEIN. I questioned the agency's accountant, who emailed back: "If you are paying your commissions to the entity, all you have to do on your personal return is to file a Schedule C that shows the income amount from the 1099. On the miscellaneous expense line, show nominee payments to the entity and list its EIN#. Thus, you are netting your amount to 0, and all the income is in the entity." I understand the concept of netting, but I've not done this before, and I want to know what potential problems anyone sees in this manoeuver? Thanks, Rob Nyberg << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| income, nominating, partnership, potential, problems, sch |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Potential Solution To Startup And Update Problems tim riley (r4492): I found this in a completely unrelated site, but it worked for me. Find a file called HOSTS and open it in Notepad. You'll find that all of the... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 06-01-2005 01:41 PM | |
| Lost a potential customer Rich Sidney: I am getting tired of Quicken (although I did purchase Q 2005). I downloaded the Money 2005 trial, expecting to be able to <b>easily</bimport my Q... | Microsoft Money | 9 | 04-04-2005 02:33 AM | |
| Potential tax problem Mary Susan Smith: I was married for six years and have been divorced for three. Most people won't say this but the divorce was 100% my fault. He now lives in... | Taxes | 5 | 02-12-2004 07:12 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |