|
#24
| |||
| |||
| Hey Drew, thanks for the cites. They are very appreciated, but certainly not expected in such great detail. ;-) Jennifer DeBoer << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > You haven't been in the business long I see. If I went and
Who said that I would give the client cites? I just won't> spoke Code and Regs to answer questions from my clients, > they would look at me funny. They want an answer, not a > citation. speak affirmatively w/o looking at the original text, that's all. I thought I would get a collegial response from the group. I didn't expect people to get snippy. Jennifer DeBoer << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| Herb Smith wrote: - quote - > Maren Purves wrote:
Thanks, I'll try to remember that for the next time.> > rick++ wrote: > > > The remainder of points from a previous loan can be deducted > > > immediately. The new loan points is amortized over 30 years. > > doesn't have to be 30 years if the mortgage isn't. I think > > the wording is "lifetime of the loan". This is also why you > > can deduct the remainder of the amortized points when you > > pay off the loan. > This latter point is only true, if you use a DIFFERENT > LENDER for the re-fi. If not, the remaining points from the > previous loan are added to the points from the re-fi, and > amortized over the length of the re-fi loan. I believe you > will find a discussion of this in Pub 936. Maren (load paid off now ayway) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| "Jennifer D" <best_scrivener[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU wrote:
You haven't been in the business long I see. If I went and> > "Shyster1040" <Shyster1040[at]nospamhotmail.com> wrote: > > > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some > > > sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > > > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > > > out of it. > > > > > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than > > > someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > > > than a naked assessment). > > > > > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > > > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > > > spoils it for the rest of us. > > Then YOU can be the shining example. YOU can post all the > > citations you want. The rest of us will provide mere > > educated off the cuff responses. > I am the one who posted the original question asking for a > cite. > I agree that without a cite, a statement is just a mere > assertion. I also agree with the person who said that I > "hoped" for a cite, but didn't "expect a cite." I certainly > didn't expect someone to say that "I get paid to provide > this kind of information." If you can't say something nice, > don't say it at all. We are all always students. > If you are a good tax professional, you talk Code. You > don't talk about things in the abstract. spoke Code and Regs to answer questions from my clients, they would look at me funny. They want an answer, not a citation. - quote - > I also agree with
Read my post about the difference between lending a hand and> the person who suggested the real meat is in the Regs. > Also, if you are a professional, I don't think you feel > threatened by sharing info. There will always be business > for you if you are good. doing someone's work for them. <snipped as it was irrelevant> ================================================== ========== - quote - > Moderator:
I would also point out in addition to Dick's comment that> There is a significant difference between MTM and the ABA > Tax group. MTM is a professional tax forum driven by > questions from taxpayers. This group was created as an > alternative to misc.taxes (aka The Funny Farm) which is > a haven for tax protesters. > ================================================== ========== there is a huge difference between actual tax practice and academic study. You use citations to support a conclusion on an issue you're defending or supporting in actual practice. You don't use them in common everyday office behavior. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| snip Hopefully we can end this thread with some cites. Amortizing points is from IRC 461(g)(1). The reason one cannot deduct other loan closing costs is that deductions are a matter of legislative grace. BNA provides the following case cites to this concept: e.g., Gapikia v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2001-83. See also INDOPCO, Inc. v. Comr., 503 U.S. 79 (1992); Interstate Transit Lines v. Comr., 319 U.S. 590, 593 (1943); Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 496 (1940); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435 (1934); Exxon Mobil Corp. v. U.S., 244 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Centex Corp. v. U.S., 48 Fed. Cl. 625 (2001); Petty v. Comr. T.C. Memo 2001-59; Campbell v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2001-51; Gerstenberger v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2001-50; Burris v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2001-49; U.S. v. Powell, 2001-1 USTC ¶50,305 (D.Ariz. 2001); Leschke v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2001-18; Haeder v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2001-7; Ashley v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2000-376; Daya v. Comr., T.C. Memo 2000-360; In re CM Holdings, Inc., 301 F.3d 96, (2002) Sutherland Lumber-Southwest Inc. v. Comr., 114 T.C. 197 (2000), acq. AOD CC-2002-02; Gomez v. Comr. T.C. Memo 1999-94; Stark v. Comr., T.C. Memo 1999-1; American Elec. Power, Inc. v. U.S., 136 F. Supp.2d 762 (S.D. Ohio 2001). As there is no place in IRC 161-199 (PART VI--Itemized Deductions for Individuals and Corporations) nor in 211-224 (PART VII--Additional Itemized Deductions for Individuals) allowing the deduction of refinancing costs as individual itemized deductions, they aren't allowed. Also see IRC 63(d) which starts out: "For purposes of this subtitle, the term 'itemized deductions' means the deductions allowable under this chapter other than--" -- Drew Edmundson << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Herb Smith wrote: - quote - > Maren Purves wrote:
With bank mergers, how is the mortgage-payer supposed to> > rick++ wrote: > > doesn't have to be 30 years if the mortgage isn't. I think > > the wording is "lifetime of the loan". This is also why you > > can deduct the remainder of the amortized points when you > > pay off the loan. > This latter point is only true, if you use a DIFFERENT > LENDER for the re-fi. If not, the remaining points from the > previous loan are added to the points from the re-fi, and > amortized over the length of the re-fi loan. I believe you > will find a discussion of this in Pub 936. KNOW if it's the same lender? (In some cases, it's clear, but....) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Frederick Jorden wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote:
It's been said that you gets what you pays for. Last> > Shyster1040 wrote: > > > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some > > > sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > > > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > > > out of it. > > Maybe a "complete" answer should, but during tax season > > especially, few of us have the time to actually look > > anything up just to provide a cite. Hence I shall continue > > to give "just the facts, M'am.", i.e. a bare bones answer. > > > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than > > > someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > > > than a naked assessment). > > > > > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > > > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > > > spoils it for the rest of us. > > Whew; Glad you didn't include us EA's in your comments. > > (grin > I thought one was not to look a gift horse in the mouth. > Each respondent to this news group will, within the rules > dictated by our moderator, provide as extensive an answer as > he or she wishes. The extent of the response is > proportionate to the fee paid for the service. night we had free tickets to a concert by Itzhak Perlman and arriving at the theatre I found it cost a dollar to park one's car, so I was complaining, sort of half heartedly to be sure, and wife reminded me what Frederick says above, not to look a gift horse in the mouth. Are there any tax advice web sites which charge a fee and guarantee their cites? I've not seen any. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Sun 13 Feb 2005 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU wrote: - quote - > "Shyster1040" <Shyster1040[at]nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
I am the one who posted the original question asking for a> > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some > > sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > > out of it. > > > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than > > someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > > than a naked assessment). > > > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > > spoils it for the rest of us. > Then YOU can be the shining example. YOU can post all the > citations you want. The rest of us will provide mere > educated off the cuff responses. cite. I agree that without a cite, a statement is just a mere assertion. I also agree with the person who said that I "hoped" for a cite, but didn't "expect a cite." I certainly didn't expect someone to say that "I get paid to provide this kind of information." If you can't say something nice, don't say it at all. We are all always students. If you are a good tax professional, you talk Code. You don't talk about things in the abstract. I also agree with the person who suggested the real meat is in the Regs. Also, if you are a professional, I don't think you feel threatened by sharing info. There will always be business for you if you are good. For your information, I just started a tax business. I have a JD, but I am not an attorney, yet. One can't know every area of the Code like its the back of one's hand, but one can help others. WHY? Because they might help you some other time. On the ABA Tax group, the members are constantly talking Code, Rev Procs, Regs, and case law. Why? Because they are all trying to help each other be the best they can be. They want to do things right. I will gain business by the relationships I build. I won't lose business by helping someone on the Internet who might live in CA while I live in Ohio. Just in case there is someone seeking help who lives in N.E. Ohio email me. I highly doubt that I will get business, this way, though. I don't expect it. I expect a forum to talk Code so that we can all be better professionals Tax Cents LLC Jennifer DeBoer New Philadelphia, Ohio ================================================== ========== Moderator: There is a significant difference between MTM and the ABA Tax group. MTM is a professional tax forum driven by questions from taxpayers. This group was created as an alternative to misc.taxes (aka The Funny Farm) which is a haven for tax protesters. ================================================== ========== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Maren Purves wrote: - quote - > rick++ wrote:
This latter point is only true, if you use a DIFFERENT> > The remainder of points from a previous loan can be deducted > > immediately. The new loan points is amortized over 30 years. > doesn't have to be 30 years if the mortgage isn't. I think > the wording is "lifetime of the loan". This is also why you > can deduct the remainder of the amortized points when you > pay off the loan. LENDER for the re-fi. If not, the remaining points from the previous loan are added to the points from the re-fi, and amortized over the length of the re-fi loan. I believe you will find a discussion of this in Pub 936. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > I would love citations to the Code/Regs or case law if
I agree with Dave, if they don't like the answers received> > > > anyone has them. > > > I get *PAID* to provide cites. > > Jeesh, Dave, chill out. Public internet groups are for > > helping others and sharing information. Why are you here > > with that kind of attitude? > There's a difference between offering a helping hand and > doing someone's work for them. on a FREE web site, the poster can get a REFUND on the way out. ================================================== ========= Moderator: We have a double your money back satisfaction guarantee. To take advantage of it, just send a voided blank check (must have your name, address and SSN on the face of the check) and a xerox copy of three of your major cards to our Nigerian office. ================================================== ========= << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Shyster1040 wrote:
I thought one was not to look a gift horse in the mouth.> > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some > > sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > > out of it. > Maybe a "complete" answer should, but during tax season > especially, few of us have the time to actually look > anything up just to provide a cite. Hence I shall continue > to give "just the facts, M'am.", i.e. a bare bones answer. > > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than > > someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > > than a naked assessment). > > > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > > spoils it for the rest of us. > Whew; Glad you didn't include us EA's in your comments. > (grin Each respondent to this news group will, within the rules dictated by our moderator, provide as extensive an answer as he or she wishes. The extent of the response is proportionate to the fee paid for the service. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "Shyster1040" <Shyster1040[at]nospamhotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some
Then YOU can be the shining example. YOU can post all the> sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > out of it. > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than > someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > than a naked assessment). > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > spoils it for the rest of us. citations you want. The rest of us will provide mere educated off the cuff responses. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Shyster1040 wrote: - quote - > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some
Maybe a "complete" answer should, but during tax season> sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > out of it. especially, few of us have the time to actually look anything up just to provide a cite. Hence I shall continue to give "just the facts, M'am.", i.e. a bare bones answer. - quote - > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than
Whew; Glad you didn't include us EA's in your comments.> someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > than a naked assessment). > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > spoils it for the rest of us. (grin ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Thu 10 Feb 2005 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Shyster1040" <Shyster1040[at]nospamhotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some
I disagree. I don't think a CPA or an EA is required to> sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > out of it. provide a cite on a free newsgroup. For a "complete" answer a cite may be required but even then I don't think it is always necessary. e.g. Would you have us cite the Rev. Proc. each time we give the mileage rate? But people asking for free advice on a newsgroup aren't entitled to a "complete" answer. They may want one, they may need one, but they aren't entitled to anything. Nor do I think the OP was expecting a cite, she was just hoping for one. - quote - > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than
I agree. But I would further say that even with a cite the> someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > than a naked assessment). answer should not be considered correct. The cite is just a starting point for the person to find/verify the answer themselves. - quote - > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you
Sometimes things said in newsgroups are misinterpreted. I> don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > spoils it for the rest of us. prefer to read Dave's response as a good natured ribbing of the OP. That said, if I had replied I would have probably just ignored the request for a cite. Perhaps you aren't aware of this but Dick Adams is the Dictator/King of M.T.M and he makes the rules for this "game." We play by his rules or we don't play at all. -- Drew Edmundson << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Shyster1040" <Shyster1040[at]nospamhotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some
First, let me apologize to everyone for allowing that> sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of > the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun > out of it. > Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than > someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better > than a naked assessment). > With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you > don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude > spoils it for the rest of us. sarcastic remark to be posted. Second, as Drew graciously pointed out, I make the rules here. And I do not recall making any of the rules you have suggested. Third, Chapter 26 of the United States Code Service is a valid cite because if you don't have a copy of the IRC, a more specific site is useless. If you do have a copy, you can easily find the cite yourself. Fourth, if you asked for a cite for when royalties are not subject to self-employment income, I know it's in Langford vs. Commissioner. Do I know the case numerology? Hell no. Do I know whether it's a Tax Court case or an Appellate case? Again hell no. Can I look it up? Of course I can. Will I? IT DEPENDS <G Finally, I don't like arguments. Dick --- Richard D. Adams, CPA, CIA, CISA, CDP, CCP, CSP Professor of Accounting (Retired) Moderator: misc.taxes.moderated << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| For what it's worth, a complete answer should involve some sort of citation - since a lot of the real work comes out of the regulations, a mere Code cite doesn't take all the fun out of it. Without a cite, the answer is neither more nor less than someone's naked assertion (which is only slightly better than a naked assessment). With all due respect to the hard-working CPAs here, if you don't want to play the game, don't show up - bad attitude spoils it for the rest of us. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU wrote: - quote - > > > > I would love citations to the Code/Regs or case law if
Certainly agree with you there, however , probably best> > > > anyone has them. > > > I get *PAID* to provide cites. > > Jeesh, Dave, chill out. Public internet groups are for > > helping others and sharing information. Why are you here > > with that kind of attitude? > There's a difference between offering a helping hand and > doing someone's work for them. not to even comment on the question. I'm not here to drum up business (although I DID get two new clients from here, although I never place any contact information in my signature). ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to Rick ++, Arthur, & Maren for your helful comments. Jennifer DeBoer << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > I would love citations to the Code/Regs or case law if
There's a difference between offering a helping hand and> > > anyone has them. > > I get *PAID* to provide cites. > Jeesh, Dave, chill out. Public internet groups are for > helping others and sharing information. Why are you here > with that kind of attitude? doing someone's work for them. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > I would love citations to the Code/Regs or case law if
I think someone already gave him the cites. We all have pet> > > anyone has them. > > I get *PAID* to provide cites. > Jeesh, Dave, chill out. Public internet groups are for > helping others and sharing information. Why are you here > with that kind of attitude? peeves and bad days. Maybe the nastiest thing to do is give him the Section and let him decipher the answer. Maybe 4-5 years ago I was at a party and someone asked me about the Foreign Earned Income Credit. The dialogue went: It's in Section 961. Where's that? In the Internal Revenue Code. Where can I find it? Try the internet or the public library. Will they have it? Absolutely. Excuse me I need to find my wife. I later learned from another CPA that he was getting paid by direct-deposit by a German company for post-sales equipment support and thought that this was foreign earned income! Moral: Tis better to ask a question than to get a cite!! <G << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| closing, deducted, fees, refi |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Closing the backup dialog without closing Money Marilyn & Bob: In all versions of Money that I have used (from Money95, I think it was called) up to 2005, if you started to close Money by clicking on the X, you... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-22-2006 04:30 AM | |
| Mortgage Refi Donna Ford: This is my first experience with refinancing a mortgage. Any suggestions on the process? I cannot find any decent info in the user's guide's index... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-30-2005 09:25 PM | |
| Taxes on cash out during refi? Dan Kennedy: If I decide to refi my house, do I pay taxes on the cash I take this year? If not, I know the IRS is going to take their money at some point, so... | Taxes | 11 | 11-06-2004 11:19 PM | |
| Mortgage Closing Costs & Fees Ron D.: How do I account for the fees and closing costs involved in setting up a mortgage for a new home? I can set up the mortgage loan account just fine... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-19-2003 08:04 PM | |
| Money 2003-Refi on Auto - Advice $2K3 User: I just refinanced my auto loan. I would really appreciate some ideas on what the group does in this situation. I updated the balance due on the... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-12-2003 04:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |