|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "oynk" <jwestpha[at]adelphia.net> wrote: - quote - > Thanks to everyone. I eventually filed the schedule C and
You generally want to avoid the "hobby loss" rules if at all> did the paperwork. <yuck> I still find this confusing, though. What I seem to be > hearing is that I'm dammed if I do, and dammed if I don't. > What I can see happening is that I go along for the next > several years and end up with a loss of about $400-500 a > year. The IRS gets all huffy and says that it's not a > business, it's a hobby, and I'm not entitled to deduct the > losses. > Fine, so I call it a hobby, and for the next few years I > show a hobby "profit" of $600-700 a year. Now, I'm in > trouble for not filing as a business and paying SE tax?! possible. The best way to do that is to run your business in a business-like way. Many businesses operate at a loss for quite a few years, but as long as you have the expectation of a profit some day and are seeking customers, you have probably met the burden of proof that it is a business and not a hobby. -- Tom Healy, CPA Boulder, CO Web: http://www.tomhealycpa.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > In my opinion there is no such thing as a "hobby profit." If
Thanks to everyone. I eventually filed the schedule C and> the activity is profitable and is engaged in on a "regular > and continuous basis," it IS a "business" for tax purposes, > regardless of how casual or sloppy your approach may be. > Note that the so-call "hobby loss" rules are just that: a > limitation on the deduction of LOSSES. I don't see any grace > allowed in the case of gains. > That said, I suppose it might be possible to have an > OCCASIONAL hobby gain without incurring SE tax liability. An > example might be an amateur athlete who normally incurred > losses (non-deductible), but then on a one-shot basis won a > prize of significant value. That MIGHT work. But, the second > time you won a substantial prize, you have begun to slide > down the slippery slope. did the paperwork. <yuck I still find this confusing, though. What I seem to be hearing is that I'm dammed if I do, and dammed if I don't. What I can see happening is that I go along for the next several years and end up with a loss of about $400-500 a year. The IRS gets all huffy and says that it's not a business, it's a hobby, and I'm not entitled to deduct the losses. Fine, so I call it a hobby, and for the next few years I show a hobby "profit" of $600-700 a year. Now, I'm in trouble for not filing as a business and paying SE tax?! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| oynk wrote: - quote - > If I meet that standard that the IRS sets forth, do I *have*
In my opinion there is no such thing as a "hobby profit." If> to call it a business? (And, if I keep sloppier records and > act less professionally, then does that negate the "proof" > of a profit motive). the activity is profitable and is engaged in on a "regular and continuous basis," it IS a "business" for tax purposes, regardless of how casual or sloppy your approach may be. Note that the so-call "hobby loss" rules are just that: a limitation on the deduction of LOSSES. I don't see any grace allowed in the case of gains. That said, I suppose it might be possible to have an OCCASIONAL hobby gain without incurring SE tax liability. An example might be an amateur athlete who normally incurred losses (non-deductible), but then on a one-shot basis won a prize of significant value. That MIGHT work. But, the second time you won a substantial prize, you have begun to slide down the slippery slope. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "oynk" wrote: - quote - > I've recently decided to become a stay-at-home mom.
The way you've described it, you're taking on enough work to> In the process, I've been looking at ways to bring in > a little extra money, and I've started doing a variety of > little jobs on the side. > ...I'm having fun, > traveling around, and bringing in a much needed few extra > hundred dollars a month....once I deduct all the expenses > I'm entitled to, I'm operating at a loss. > If I claim actual vehicle > expenses and depreciation (instead of the standard rate) > and business use of my home, it's actually a decent loss > (a few thousand, anyway).... keep busy and have some fun. That does not satisfy the section 183 rules about conducting the activity like a business. But since auto and home office throw it into a loss, you still have positive cash flow, but that's irrelevant to section 183. So...rather than lose anything to the 2% floor, file a Sch C. The home office cannot reduce net income below zero, so don't claim a home office, which may not be regular enough use to qualify anyway. Then, if necessary, reduce your auto mileage at the standard rate to that which you can absolutely prove beyond a shadow of doubt. ;-) Is the loss now about $40, or a profit of $30? Fred F. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| An interesting question. You probably can keep it a hobby, but you'll have to make sure that you play down the profit-making aspect and play up the personal enjoyment aspect. One reason why the IRS might try to turn it into a trade or business is so that you become liable for self-employment tax. You would do well to do a little research on what fact-sets the IRS particularly likes when it argues that something is a hobby rather than a business, identify the facts that weigh best in favor of that decision, and construct your routine accordingly. Sloppy books may be a factor, but they're not determinative, and if the IRS otherwise decides that you have a business, it will use a proxy method to reconstruct your income (like the bank account method - everything going into the account is presumed income unless you can show otherwise) and will not grant you deductions unless you can prove those. You could end up paying tax on more income than you actually had. It's a difficult line to stay on the desired side of, but with some decent research you should be able to achieve the desired result. Talking to a cpa/tax attorney would help. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've recently decided to become a stay-at-home mom. In the process, I've been looking at ways to bring in a little extra money, and I've started doing a variety of little jobs on the side. In terms of the real world, I'm having fun, traveling around, and bringing in a much needed few extra hundred dollars a month. In terms of the way the IRS looks at things, once I deduct all the expenses I'm entitled to, I'm operating at a loss. If I claim actual vehicle expenses and depreciation (instead of the standard rate) and business use of my home, it's actually a decent loss (a few thousand, anyway). (I feel like I have a pretty thorough understanding of these provisions, so that's not the issue). I understand that most people *want* to be able to show that their hobby is really a business so they can take the deduction associated with the loss. Right now, I'm just weighing all my options. The truth of the matter is, I think that I'd just as soon just break even and not hassle with all the extra paperwork and the threat of an audit over my head. I've searched and searched, and I can't find anything that says if I'm *requried* to prove that what I'm doing is just a hobby and not a business. (I doubt I'd ever get to the point where I'd owe self-employment tax). If I meet that standard that the IRS sets forth, do I *have* to call it a business? (And, if I keep sloppier records and act less professionally, then does that negate the "proof" of a profit motive). Also, it looks like depreciation is deductible (up to the 2% limit, etc.) for a hobby, based on the three tiers under rules for Activities Not For Profit). If I decide that I want to claim the depreciation do I just fill out the form and then claim the amount under misc. deductions on schedule A? Thanks, << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| consistent, hobby, make, profit, small |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Getting consistent report exports to Excel martin_pentreath@hotmail.com: Hi, I have set up a "favourite" report showing spending by subcategory for the last 12 months as a column of figures. My plan is that each month... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 03-22-2008 08:02 PM | |
| Hobby or self-employment? Whit Matteson: An 18 year old dependent college freshman, studying to be an engineer, also happens to play the trumpet quite well. He is invited occasionally to... | Taxes | 25 | 01-27-2004 09:53 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |