|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > In response to Gary, what we're considering doing is selling
I read the above as your buying in Ca immediately after> our current WA house while still in WA, and then buying a > "vacation" home in CA after moving, debt-free, into a rental > in WA. Then, at the appropriate time (ASAP) we would quit > our jobs and move to the CA vacation house while paying the > mortgage and living expenses using savings. My plans > indicate that a year off will use absolutely no more than > 50% of our cash savings without having to dip into 401K and > other sacred pots of gold. selling in Wa. That's good - homes appreciate and if you were to be out of the market for a year it could cost you a substantial amount. Good luck with your plans. dick w << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| To everyone, thanks for the great advice. I had no idea that the 1040ES existed and have already run through several scenarios. In response to Gary, what we're considering doing is selling our current WA house while still in WA, and then buying a "vacation" home in CA after moving, debt-free, into a rental in WA. Then, at the appropriate time (ASAP) we would quit our jobs and move to the CA vacation house while paying the mortgage and living expenses using savings. My plans indicate that a year off will use absolutely no more than 50% of our cash savings without having to dip into 401K and other sacred pots of gold. Rick, I'd love to deduct the moving expenses but the whole point of this year off is that I don't want a job. Ilooked into it and found that I'd have to be working relatively full time in order to deduct the moving expenses. ![]() Dick, you're absolutely right about prices in So Cal - they're outrageous. We're looking for a tiny cabin with one bedroom and basic facilities. Our hope is that it will remain our vacation home for many year, and then we can either sell it our build/retire to it. Thanks for the advice regarding moving the deductions - I will look into that more. Thanks again to all! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat
You may want to stay there! California is becomming very> > race and are interested in the tax situation that this will > > create. > > ... > > What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with > > a move to Southern California - we currently live in > > Washington State. ... unfriendly. There's yet another bill (AB 6) that wants to raise personal income taxes. If it passes, then in combination with our recent Prop 63, there will be a 12% top bracket (granted, at $1M TI), and with one of the highest statewide sales taxes (7.75% statewide; some localities have 8.75%), do you really want to be in a state that is taxing its citizens at over 20%? That rivals the Federal rates. - quote - > > The big question is WHEN?
NOT NOW nor the near future.- quote - > > Obviously, one of our desires while living off savings for a
Then you definently don't want to come here.> > year is decreasing the amount we pay in taxes. So what > > we're thinking is that instead of taking a year off between > > January and December, we would take the year off between > > July and the following July. - quote - > > The logic is that in both years we will be earning money for
It appears that he is considering only the income tax. The> > 6 months of the year. In both years we will be paying > > mortgage interest for the whole year. In both years we will > > have HALVED our annual gross salary. > > > My internal tax advisor (the one in my brain) is telling me > > that this would result in a hefty decrease in my tax > > liability for both years and assuming that we take the > > "normal" federal tax withholding for our salary level, we > > would get large refunds. > > > The tax advisor argues that taking the time off January to > > December results in me wasting my deductions as we will have > > no salary to use them against, and we'll also be in a higher > > tax bracket for the two years on either side of the year > > off. > > > Is my tax advisor correct? If not, I'll have him surgically > > removed. If he *is* correct, then I'll buy him a nice bottle > > of wine. You decide. CA sales tax rate by itself says "stay out." << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Gary Goodman" <garyXg7X[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > The main problem I see is not a tax problem. Banks, et al
If he applies for the mortgage before he quits his job,> don't like to loan money for houses unless the borrower > (that's you and your wife) have sufficient *income* to > service the payments. The percentages vary depending on your > credit record, but a lender would like for your housing > costs (mortgage payment, taxes, insurance and condo fees, if > any) to be no more than 40% of your gross income. In this > case, income does not include drawing from savings, only the > interest generated. they'll approve it based on the salary he was generating. As long as they don't read this newsgroup, they won't know he's planning on reducing his income. -- Barry Margolin, barmar[at]alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| bobboberts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat
The main problem I see is not a tax problem. Banks, et al> race and are interested in the tax situation that this will > create. > Our current situation: Under 30, no kids, have a house with > maybe $40K equity in it, earn $150K a year household income, > and have a decent amount of savings. > What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with > a move to Southern California - we currently live in > Washington State. We plan on buying a house down there and > living off savings for paying the new mortgage and general > expenses. > The big question is WHEN? > Obviously, one of our desires while living off savings for a > year is decreasing the amount we pay in taxes. So what > we're thinking is that instead of taking a year off between > January and December, we would take the year off between > July and the following July. > The logic is that in both years we will be earning money for > 6 months of the year. In both years we will be paying > mortgage interest for the whole year. In both years we will > have HALVED our annual gross salary. > My internal tax advisor (the one in my brain) is telling me > that this would result in a hefty decrease in my tax > liability for both years and assuming that we take the > "normal" federal tax withholding for our salary level, we > would get large refunds. > The tax advisor argues that taking the time off January to > December results in me wasting my deductions as we will have > no salary to use them against, and we'll also be in a higher > tax bracket for the two years on either side of the year > off. > Is my tax advisor correct? If not, I'll have him surgically > removed. If he *is* correct, then I'll buy him a nice bottle > of wine. You decide. > Finally, are there any other ways of reducing the tax burden > in the scenario above? don't like to loan money for houses unless the borrower (that's you and your wife) have sufficient *income* to service the payments. The percentages vary depending on your credit record, but a lender would like for your housing costs (mortgage payment, taxes, insurance and condo fees, if any) to be no more than 40% of your gross income. In this case, income does not include drawing from savings, only the interest generated. Gary -- E-mail to the above address is rarely read. If you want to contact me directly, please send an e-mail to: gary at gdgoodman dot com. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| bobboberts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat
With only 40k equity, taking a year off AND moving to> race and are interested in the tax situation that this will > create. > Our current situation: Under 30, no kids, have a house with > maybe $40K equity in it, earn $150K a year household income, > and have a decent amount of savings. > What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with > a move to Southern California - we currently live in > Washington State. We plan on buying a house down there and > living off savings for paying the new mortgage and general > expenses. > The big question is WHEN? > Obviously, one of our desires while living off savings for a > year is decreasing the amount we pay in taxes. So what > we're thinking is that instead of taking a year off between > January and December, we would take the year off between > July and the following July. > The logic is that in both years we will be earning money for > 6 months of the year. In both years we will be paying > mortgage interest for the whole year. In both years we will > have HALVED our annual gross salary. > My internal tax advisor (the one in my brain) is telling me > that this would result in a hefty decrease in my tax > liability for both years and assuming that we take the > "normal" federal tax withholding for our salary level, we > would get large refunds. > The tax advisor argues that taking the time off January to > December results in me wasting my deductions as we will have > no salary to use them against, and we'll also be in a higher > tax bracket for the two years on either side of the year > off. > Is my tax advisor correct? If not, I'll have him surgically > removed. If he *is* correct, then I'll buy him a nice bottle > of wine. You decide. > Finally, are there any other ways of reducing the tax burden > in the scenario above? California may not be possible. Please check out housing prices where you plan to move to; you might have an unhappy surprise. Consider the 4 consecutive years, 1, 2, 3, and 4; where you plan not working the last 1/2 of year 2 and the 1st 1/2 of year 3. Your tax deductions are worth less those years. If you are itemizing deductions, you want to move deductions from year 2 to year 1 and from year 3 to year 4. Many deductions can be moved: Make charitable deductions in years 1 and 4, none in 2 and 3. Don't wait for year 2 state filing, make an estimated final payment of year 1 state taxes 12/25 of year 1. Default on year 3 property taxes, pay a penalty (10% ? - check 1st). Its good business to pay a penalty if you save more on year 4 taxes. Don't wait for year 1 medical bills, make estimated payments on everything by 12/30. In year 3 you can at least wait until Jan 1 of year 4 before mailing December payments. And if you have optional procedures, schedule them accordingly. And so on - look at every deduction and what can be done to move it. dick w << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| bobboberts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat
Get a JOB in So. Cal. and you can write off the moving> race and are interested in the tax situation that this will > create. > Our current situation: Under 30, no kids, have a house with > maybe $40K equity in it, earn $150K a year household income, > and have a decent amount of savings. > What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with > a move to Southern California - we currently live in > Washington State. We plan on buying a house down there and > living off savings for paying the new mortgage and general > expenses. expenses. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to the both of you for your advice and confirming my tax advisors theory. Also, thanks for the wine advice. My tax advisor will be very happy! Matthew << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| bobboberts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat
Please do this your self using a 1040-ES for 2005 and 2006> race and are interested in the tax situation that this will > create. > Our current situation: Under 30, no kids, have a house with > maybe $40K equity in it, earn $150K a year household income, > and have a decent amount of savings. > What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with > a move to Southern California - we currently live in > Washington State. We plan on buying a house down there and > living off savings for paying the new mortgage and general > expenses. > The big question is WHEN? > Obviously, one of our desires while living off savings for a > year is decreasing the amount we pay in taxes. So what > we're thinking is that instead of taking a year off between > January and December, we would take the year off between > July and the following July. > The logic is that in both years we will be earning money for > 6 months of the year. In both years we will be paying > mortgage interest for the whole year. In both years we will > have HALVED our annual gross salary. > My internal tax advisor (the one in my brain) is telling me > that this would result in a hefty decrease in my tax > liability for both years and assuming that we take the > "normal" federal tax withholding for our salary level, we > would get large refunds. > The tax advisor argues that taking the time off January to > December results in me wasting my deductions as we will have > no salary to use them against, and we'll also be in a higher > tax bracket for the two years on either side of the year > off. > Is my tax advisor correct? If not, I'll have him surgically > removed. If he *is* correct, then I'll buy him a nice bottle > of wine. You decide. > Finally, are there any other ways of reducing the tax burden > in the scenario above? and let us know what you decide. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| You are correct, Sir, to quote Ed McMahan's response to the late Johnny Carson. If you took your year off during one calendar year you would lose all your itemized deductions (mortgage interest, property taxes, DMV fees, chaitable contributions, job hunting expenses, investment expenses, etc.) plus your personal exemptions for that year. You would also pay taxes at your usual rate in the years around the sabbatical. Make that bottle of wine something from Joe Hart's winery in Temecula CA. he makes some great vintages. Linda Dorfmont E.A., CFP, CSA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| bobboberts[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat
Okay then. If he likes red wine, a Chateauneuf du Pape or> race and are interested in the tax situation that this will > create. > Our current situation: Under 30, no kids, have a house with > maybe $40K equity in it, earn $150K a year household income, > and have a decent amount of savings. > What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with > a move to Southern California - we currently live in > Washington State. We plan on buying a house down there and > living off savings for paying the new mortgage and general > expenses. > The big question is WHEN? > Obviously, one of our desires while living off savings for a > year is decreasing the amount we pay in taxes. So what > we're thinking is that instead of taking a year off between > January and December, we would take the year off between > July and the following July. > The logic is that in both years we will be earning money for > 6 months of the year. In both years we will be paying > mortgage interest for the whole year. In both years we will > have HALVED our annual gross salary. > My internal tax advisor (the one in my brain) is telling me > that this would result in a hefty decrease in my tax > liability for both years and assuming that we take the > "normal" federal tax withholding for our salary level, we > would get large refunds. > The tax advisor argues that taking the time off January to > December results in me wasting my deductions as we will have > no salary to use them against, and we'll also be in a higher > tax bracket for the two years on either side of the year > off. > Is my tax advisor correct? If not, I'll have him surgically > removed. If he *is* correct, then I'll buy him a nice bottle > of wine. You decide. even a really good Beaujolais; even though it IS french. For a white, any really good California Chablis or Chardonnay; I'm kinda partial to Austrailian Yellowtail Chardonnay these days. Oh, almost forgot, the tax aspect. Yes, I would second his notion that you split the years if possible. This is an up to date version of what we used to call "income averaging". ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA ---------------------------- Moderator: I'll send you my recipe for Chateau Trailer Park. ---------------------------- << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My wife and I are considering taking a year off from the rat race and are interested in the tax situation that this will create. Our current situation: Under 30, no kids, have a house with maybe $40K equity in it, earn $150K a year household income, and have a decent amount of savings. What we want to do is take a year out and combine this with a move to Southern California - we currently live in Washington State. We plan on buying a house down there and living off savings for paying the new mortgage and general expenses. The big question is WHEN? Obviously, one of our desires while living off savings for a year is decreasing the amount we pay in taxes. So what we're thinking is that instead of taking a year off between January and December, we would take the year off between July and the following July. The logic is that in both years we will be earning money for 6 months of the year. In both years we will be paying mortgage interest for the whole year. In both years we will have HALVED our annual gross salary. My internal tax advisor (the one in my brain) is telling me that this would result in a hefty decrease in my tax liability for both years and assuming that we take the "normal" federal tax withholding for our salary level, we would get large refunds. The tax advisor argues that taking the time off January to December results in me wasting my deductions as we will have no salary to use them against, and we'll also be in a higher tax bracket for the two years on either side of the year off. Is my tax advisor correct? If not, I'll have him surgically removed. If he *is* correct, then I'll buy him a nice bottle of wine. You decide. Finally, are there any other ways of reducing the tax burden in the scenario above? Thanks for all responses! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| situation, taking, tax, year |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| New situation for me CBotella: I have a client whose both parents are deceased. Father died in 2002, mother in 2003. Client filed the necessary tax returns for his mother in... | Taxes | 5 | 10-19-2004 03:08 PM | |
| Head of Household Situation Dick Adams: No question here, just an interesting situation. Woman is widowed with three children. She has moved in with her twin sister who is married with... | Taxes | 4 | 07-09-2004 06:17 PM | |
| Please Help, Complicated Tax Situation Matt McKenna: I worked as an employee for a non-profit from May 2003 to December 2003. During the time I worked there, my employer refused to collect any tax... | Taxes | 4 | 02-10-2004 07:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |