|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
Could this be a grantor trust, where all the income and> > OK, this is the first IRS letter I've got on my wife's > > mother's trust's employment tax returns, and after talking > > with the IRS, I'm even more confused. > > > Background: My MIL is unable to take care of herself. I > > don't know if she's still legally competant, but all bank > > accounts she has control of are joint with my wife, so that, > > unless she takes it upon herself to withdraw the money and > > give it to someone, she should be OK. As she doesn't > > remember the account numbers, anyway. > > > In any case, we set up a living trust so the my wife can > > manage her accounts. That (grantor) trust hired a live-in > > caretaker, and has been filing the appropriate Federal > > (stand-alone 1040 Schedule H, W-2, and W-3) and California > > (DE3 series, and DE7) forms. > The trust files a 1040? I would think that it would use > the usual 941,940 forms as appropriate. > > Aside from some confusion as to where the Schedule H's are > > to be sent, we haven't had any problems. Until now. > > > We got a notice about the 2002 Schedule H, saying that, > > after receiving information from California, they've > > recalculated the return. What it appears they've done is, > > for the "original" return, they've copied the net FUTA into > > the gross Federal employment tax field. (We qualified for > > the simplified calculation in part II Section A of the form, > > so that the net tax of 0.8% is all that appears on the > > form.) The "new" return seems to have section B filled out, > > but lost the Social Security and Medicare taxes, so they > > want to send us a large refund. > > > The only additional anomaly on the return is that I put the > > wrong check digit on the state reporting number on the > > original return. > So that's what cause the original problem. IRS couldn't > match anything with the state DOL # > > The agent and the number on the letter > > referred me to the direct number at the employment tax > > office in Ogden, which seems to be a voice mail drop. As > > both my wife and I have to be on the phone to deal with the > > issue, a callback wouldn't work. (I'm not an employee of > > the trust, so I am not eligible for a full > > power-of-attorney. I've sent in the forms for a "preparer" > > power-of-attorney, but they haven't been processed yet.) > I think that's the best way to handle it, wait till your POA > is recorded. AFter all, time is not at a premium on > something like this. > > 1. Aside from working through a lawyer, EA, or CPA, what > > are my options in getting this resolved. Could we actually > > go into an IRS office and get it resolved? > No way. (unless the exception might prove the rule.) > > 2. In the event it ISN'T resolved, and they send the refund > > check, what can I do to avoid having a large penalty if the > > IRS ever figures out what they're doing. > Old rule of thumb, don't cash an incorrect refund check. > (grin > > 3. Should the 1040 H also be in the grantor's name, rather > > than in the trust's name. (This would screw up the matching > > even more, as the state employment accounting is in the > > trust's name.) > I'm still wondering why a schedule H? Or even why a 1040? > Of course I don't handle these every day, just maybe once a > year, and in all my cases, the daughter has POA from father > and files his 1040 form. She never did even consider a > living trust, etc, since that costs MONEY! And I agree. deductions are reported on the grantor's 1040? If that is the case, then the sch h would be appropriate on the 1040 & no 940 or 941's needed Only state payroll tax returns... and I'm not overly familiar with CA payroll taxes for domestic employees -- <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
Household employement, form 1040 schedule H (which would be> > In any case, we set up a living trust so the my wife can > > manage her accounts. That (grantor) trust hired a live-in > > caretaker, and has been filing the appropriate Federal > > (stand-alone 1040 Schedule H, W-2, and W-3) and California > > (DE3 series, and DE7) forms. > The trust files a 1040? I would think that it would use > the usual 941,940 forms as appropriate.+- attached to the 1041, if the 1041 was otherwise required). Sorry I didn't make that clear. The trust has no other (paid) employees, so the 941 and 940 are unnecessary. (And I didn't maintain my CA tax preparer registration while I was in AZ, so I can't charge for preparing the trust's income tax returns.) This also has the benefit of making the tax payments annually (by April 15 for the Federal, and January 31 for California), rather than quarterly. - quote - > > Aside from some confusion as to where the Schedule H's are
But they don't have the check digit on the letter. The> > to be sent, we haven't had any problems. Until now. > > > We got a notice about the 2002 Schedule H, saying that, > > after receiving information from California, they've > > recalculated the return. What it appears they've done is, > > for the "original" return, they've copied the net FUTA into > > the gross Federal employment tax field. (We qualified for > > the simplified calculation in part II Section A of the form, > > so that the net tax of 0.8% is all that appears on the > > form.) The "new" return seems to have section B filled out, > > but lost the Social Security and Medicare taxes, so they > > want to send us a large refund. > > > The only additional anomaly on the return is that I put the > > wrong check digit on the state reporting number on the > > original return. > So that's what cause the original problem. IRS couldn't > match anything with the state DOL # letter only has nnn-nnnn, the correct number is nnn-nnnn-6, and the 2002 1040 Schedule H has nnn-nnnn-8. (I can't find my copy of the 2003 1040 Schedule H, so I don't know if I did it right.) .... - quote - > I'm still wondering why a schedule H? Or even why a 1040?
The trust can do some things which could not be done with a> Of course I don't handle these every day, just maybe once a > year, and in all my cases, the daughter has POA from father > and files his 1040 form. She never did even consider a > living trust, etc, since that costs MONEY! And I agree. only a durable POA in case MIL is legally incompetant. But we may have wasted the money, especially since the trust document doesn't seem to provide for adding additional trustees, which would be the simplest long-term solution. I'm listed as an alternate trustee, rather than as an additional trustee. My best guess is that, in order for me to be added as a trustee, my wife would have to sign for MIL, using the durable power of attorney, to amend the trust agreement. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > OK, this is the first IRS letter I've got on my wife's
The trust files a 1040? I would think that it would use> mother's trust's employment tax returns, and after talking > with the IRS, I'm even more confused. > Background: My MIL is unable to take care of herself. I > don't know if she's still legally competant, but all bank > accounts she has control of are joint with my wife, so that, > unless she takes it upon herself to withdraw the money and > give it to someone, she should be OK. As she doesn't > remember the account numbers, anyway. > In any case, we set up a living trust so the my wife can > manage her accounts. That (grantor) trust hired a live-in > caretaker, and has been filing the appropriate Federal > (stand-alone 1040 Schedule H, W-2, and W-3) and California > (DE3 series, and DE7) forms. the usual 941,940 forms as appropriate. - quote - > Aside from some confusion as to where the Schedule H's are
So that's what cause the original problem. IRS couldn't> to be sent, we haven't had any problems. Until now. > We got a notice about the 2002 Schedule H, saying that, > after receiving information from California, they've > recalculated the return. What it appears they've done is, > for the "original" return, they've copied the net FUTA into > the gross Federal employment tax field. (We qualified for > the simplified calculation in part II Section A of the form, > so that the net tax of 0.8% is all that appears on the > form.) The "new" return seems to have section B filled out, > but lost the Social Security and Medicare taxes, so they > want to send us a large refund. > The only additional anomaly on the return is that I put the > wrong check digit on the state reporting number on the > original return. match anything with the state DOL # - quote - > The agent and the number on the letter
I think that's the best way to handle it, wait till your POA> referred me to the direct number at the employment tax > office in Ogden, which seems to be a voice mail drop. As > both my wife and I have to be on the phone to deal with the > issue, a callback wouldn't work. (I'm not an employee of > the trust, so I am not eligible for a full > power-of-attorney. I've sent in the forms for a "preparer" > power-of-attorney, but they haven't been processed yet.) is recorded. AFter all, time is not at a premium on something like this. - quote - > 1. Aside from working through a lawyer, EA, or CPA, what
No way. (unless the exception might prove the rule.)> are my options in getting this resolved. Could we actually > go into an IRS office and get it resolved? - quote - > 2. In the event it ISN'T resolved, and they send the refund
Old rule of thumb, don't cash an incorrect refund check.> check, what can I do to avoid having a large penalty if the > IRS ever figures out what they're doing. (grin - quote - > 3. Should the 1040 H also be in the grantor's name, rather
I'm still wondering why a schedule H? Or even why a 1040?> than in the trust's name. (This would screw up the matching > even more, as the state employment accounting is in the > trust's name.) Of course I don't handle these every day, just maybe once a year, and in all my cases, the daughter has POA from father and files his 1040 form. She never did even consider a living trust, etc, since that costs MONEY! And I agree. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Fri, 14 Jan 2005 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| OK, this is the first IRS letter I've got on my wife's mother's trust's employment tax returns, and after talking with the IRS, I'm even more confused. Background: My MIL is unable to take care of herself. I don't know if she's still legally competant, but all bank accounts she has control of are joint with my wife, so that, unless she takes it upon herself to withdraw the money and give it to someone, she should be OK. As she doesn't remember the account numbers, anyway. In any case, we set up a living trust so the my wife can manage her accounts. That (grantor) trust hired a live-in caretaker, and has been filing the appropriate Federal (stand-alone 1040 Schedule H, W-2, and W-3) and California (DE3 series, and DE7) forms. Aside from some confusion as to where the Schedule H's are to be sent, we haven't had any problems. Until now. We got a notice about the 2002 Schedule H, saying that, after receiving information from California, they've recalculated the return. What it appears they've done is, for the "original" return, they've copied the net FUTA into the gross Federal employment tax field. (We qualified for the simplified calculation in part II Section A of the form, so that the net tax of 0.8% is all that appears on the form.) The "new" return seems to have section B filled out, but lost the Social Security and Medicare taxes, so they want to send us a large refund. The only additional anomaly on the return is that I put the wrong check digit on the state reporting number on the original return. The agent and the number on the letter referred me to the direct number at the employment tax office in Ogden, which seems to be a voice mail drop. As both my wife and I have to be on the phone to deal with the issue, a callback wouldn't work. (I'm not an employee of the trust, so I am not eligible for a full power-of-attorney. I've sent in the forms for a "preparer" power-of-attorney, but they haven't been processed yet.) 1. Aside from working through a lawyer, EA, or CPA, what are my options in getting this resolved. Could we actually go into an IRS office and get it resolved? 2. In the event it ISN'T resolved, and they send the refund check, what can I do to avoid having a large penalty if the IRS ever figures out what they're doing. 3. Should the 1040 H also be in the grantor's name, rather than in the trust's name. (This would screw up the matching even more, as the state employment accounting is in the trust's name.) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| irs, letter, strange |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Open Letter: I'm skipping M05 Dick Watson: After running a copy of M05 Deluxe on my laptop and doing parallel data entry in M04 on my desktop and M05 on the laptop since the 17th of... | Microsoft Money | 31 | 12-19-2004 08:54 PM | |
| Re: 2797 letter Harlan Lunsford: The Crawfish wrote: > Does anyone know the purpose of IRS letter 2797? It > basically asks for you assistance in updating their records > and... | Taxes | 1 | 08-07-2003 06:20 AM | |
| Re: Homemade M04 announcement letter Michael A. Abbaticchio[MVP]: Why not take it directly from Microsoft? http://www.microsoft.com/catalog/display.asp?subid=22&site=11567 -- regards, Michael... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 07-16-2003 05:14 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |