|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I wish the VITA text material were as clear as your responses. Thanks. It's nice to know you've been doing it right all along. I'll need this for my free tax workshop I do at the local library. I have one Korean woman who comes to see me every year trying to claim her brother, who is disabled, as a dependent. But his wife works....... Linda << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| DORFMONT[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
That is the norm. But if the kids are not filing or are> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. filing married filing separately, then they can be claimed as a deduction. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| DORFMONT[at]aol.com <DORFMONT[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
There's no change, at least not for 2004.> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. > Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much > income they earn if the parents have provided more than half > their support, or the married children get their own > exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is > it whoever files first gets to choose? If the child decides to file MFJ then parent cannot claim (there's an exception that says if MFJ return was filed but no tax liability exists, parent can claim, but let's ignore this.) So the controlling hand belongs to child. === === === BTW, for anyone who knows General Jim Abraham, he spoke at our veterans post annual membership meeting last night. Jim has been working with VITA for many years, and he wrote Part A of the VITA/TCE test. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| DORFMONT[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
There is no specific requirement that a child be unmarried> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. > Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much > income they earn if the parents have provided more than half > their support, or the married children get their own > exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is > it whoever files first gets to choose? in order to be one's dependent. The Joint Return Test requires that a married child not file a joint return with a spouse. If a joint return is filed, the test is failed. The law carves out an exception to this test if the only reason the married child is filing the joint return is to obtain a refund and neither the child nor the child's spouse would have a tax liability if they filed separately. All of the preceding doesn't negate any of the other 3 tests (being a child passes the relationship test). If the child is not under age 19 or under age 24 and a full-time student then the gross income test must be passed. If the child is under age 19 or under 24 and a student, there is no gross income test. Parents could claim the married student's dependency exemption if the parents could show that they contributed more than 50% of the total support provided to the child. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| DORFMONT[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
What it comes down to is: Was there a tax benefit from the> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. > Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much > income they earn if the parents have provided more than half > their support, or the married children get their own > exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is > it whoever files first gets to choose? joint filing? If so, then the parents are SOL. If the joint return is filed to get a full refund of withholding (this implies that the "total tax" line is zero), then the joint return is disregarded for the dependency test. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "DORFMONT[at]aol.com" <DORFMONT[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
Nothing has changed. It is what you always thought it was.> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. > Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much > income they earn if the parents have provided more than half > their support, or the married children get their own > exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is > it whoever files first gets to choose? -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| DORFMONT[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
Married filing jointly has first priority. Only if the> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. > Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much > income they earn if the parents have provided more than half > their support, or the married children get their own > exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is > it whoever files first gets to choose? "other spouse" agrees to filing separately, as in the case of a non working wife who was dependent on parents all the way up to , say, December 24th, may parents claim her. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford Wed, 12 Jan 2005 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| <DORFMONT[at]aol.com> wrote - quote - > I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering
Age and income become factors for dependency.> filing status and exemptions. After reading over the > material I am confused as to who can claim and who should > claim the exemption for a married child. > A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her > parents and has been supported by them in the year of > marriage. > The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can > continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because > they provided more than half the child's support. This > elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from > filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. > And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that > when the married children file a joint return, the parents > of each of them cannot claim their respective children as > dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it > has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of > tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only > to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard > deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. > Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much > income they earn if the parents have provided more than half > their support, - quote - > or the married children get their own
Isn't it worth losing a few tax breaks for getting such a> exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is > it whoever files first gets to choose? great son-in-law? -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just taught the VITA volunteer course section covering filing status and exemptions. After reading over the material I am confused as to who can claim and who should claim the exemption for a married child. A married child is one who has been a dependent of his/her parents and has been supported by them in the year of marriage. The IRS material seems to indicate that the parents can continue to claim the child in the year of marriage because they provided more than half the child's support. This elegibility to claim the child prevents the child from filing a joint return with the spouse of the child. And then it turns around and says just the opposite: that when the married children file a joint return, the parents of each of them cannot claim their respective children as dependents. This is the way I have always learned it, and it has been a few years since I studied this basic aspect of tax law. Of course if the married children are filing only to get a refund and would owe no tax using their standard deduction, their parents can claim them as dependents. Which is it? The parents get them regardless of how much income they earn if the parents have provided more than half their support, or the married children get their own exemptions if the have enough income and file jointly? Or is it whoever files first gets to choose? Linda Dorfmont E.A., CFP, CSA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| child, dependency, exemption, married |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| can one file married filing separately after married filing jointly rvsw: My spouse and I filed taxes married filing jointly last year (one spouse's income substantially less than other). This year - income of both... | Taxes | 16 | 12-05-2004 03:06 AM | |
| Re: Ex-wife not returning Child Exemption Form Shirley.Caylor: "Venom" <venom25_1@hotmail.com> wrote: > My ex-wife will not sign and return an 8332 Child Exemption > Form as required by our dissolution of... | Taxes | 3 | 05-20-2004 05:16 AM | |
| Release of child exemption ~August: My ex-husband and I take turns claiming two of our three children each year on our taxes. Last year we each got a child tax credit advance for one... | Taxes | 1 | 01-28-2004 04:48 PM | |
| adoption & support test for dependency ricks: I know that in order to claim a child as a dependent (among other things), I must provide more than 50% of the child's support. What about for a... | Taxes | 2 | 12-14-2003 07:39 AM | |
| Wages paid to your minor child. (Exemption of Soc. Sec. taxes ) BigAl: I've read in several newsletters over the years that wages paid to your minor children that are living with you are exempt from social security... | Taxes | 3 | 11-14-2003 03:01 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |