|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > This is a question that would only be asked by someone who
You calculate the tax on $1,600,000 and then subtract the> didn't understand taxes much. > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the > following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 > There is therefore $100,000 taxable > The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the > federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is > $23,000 ( in 2004). > IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw? tax on $1,500,000 (the exemption credit), making the tax $45,000, not $23,800. -- Thomas E Healy, CPA, PC 1650 38th St., Ste 202W Boulder, CO 80301 Please send email to: tom[at]tomhealycpa.com, since I block all email at my newsgroup address. phone (303) 443-1804 fax (720) 489-3772 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| John Baker <Baker.JH[at]Verizon.net> writes: - quote - > This is a question that would only be asked by someone who
Incorrect.> didn't understand taxes much. > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the > following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 - quote - > There is therefore $100,000 taxable
Incorrect.- quote - > The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the
Correct, but $100,000 is not the taxable amount.> federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. - quote - > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is
Incorrect.> $23,000 ( in 2004). - quote - > IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw?
You're misunderstanding how the unified gift/estatetax credit works. You do NOT have a $1,500,000 exemption. Rather, you have a $555,800 gift/estate tax CREDIT. You compute the tax on the full amount, then deduct the credit. The tax on a taxable estate of $1,600,000 is $603,800. After applying the credit, the tax due is $48,000. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "John Baker" <Baker.JH[at]Verizon.net> asked: - quote - > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the
It is not correct, because that's not how the "exemption"> following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 > There is therefore $100,000 taxable > The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the > federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is > $23,000 ( in 2004). > IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw? (which technically is a *credit* for tax on an "exclusion amount") works. The way the law is worded you first need to (tentatively) calculate the tax on $1.6 million (Tax Code Sec. 2001), which is $600,800. You then subtract -- get a tax credit for -- an amount equal to the tax on the "exclusion amount" (Tax Code Sec. 2010), which in years 2004 & '05 equals $555,800 on an exclusion amount of $1.5 million. The net result is a federal estate tax of $45,000 (w/ further adjustment for State level taxes, etc.) Bob Daniels http://taxprofessor.blogspot.com ("There's no luggage rack on a hearse, and no pockets in a shroud." - 'G) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| John Baker wrote: - quote - > This is a question that would only be asked by someone who
Sort of. Actually there is a credit given that has the> didn't understand taxes much. > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the > following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 effect of an exemption. - quote - > There is therefore $100,000 taxable
In a manner of speaking.- quote - > The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the
No. First you calculate the tax on $1,600,000, and then> federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is > $23,000 ( in 2004). > IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw? subtract the tax on $1,500,000. You pay the tax in the highest bracket which applies while the exemption applies to the lowest brackets. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| John Baker wrote: - quote - > This is a question that would only be asked by someone who
True, there is only $100,000 of taxable assets in the> didn't understand taxes much. > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the > following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 > There is therefore $100,000 taxable > The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the > federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is > $23,000 ( in 2004). > IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw? estate, but you are assuming the wrong $100,000. The taxable increment is the amount OVER $1,500,000 and up to $1,600,000. There is not really an exemption of the first $1,500,000 of assets. There is a CREDIT allowed for the tax on that $1,500,000. To calculate the correct tax amount, you have to calculate the tax on a net estate of $1,600,000 and then SUBTRACT the exemption credit from that amount. You will find that the actual tax is much higher than you have calculated, and additional amounts are taxed at rates up to 48%. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "John Baker" <Baker.JH[at]Verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > This is a question that would only be asked by someone who
Incorrect. There is no exemption of $1,500,000. There is a> didn't understand taxes much. > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the > following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 > There is therefore $100,000 taxable > The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the > federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is > $23,000 ( in 2004). > IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw? tax credit that renders the first $1,500,000 tax free. So, in effect, the tax on $1.6mill is the tax on $1.6mill minus the tax on $1.5mill. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| John Baker wrote: - quote - > Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the
Not exactly. What's commonly referred to as an exemption is> following general statements are correct:. > The current exemption is $1,500,000 > There is therefore $100,000 taxable actually a credit. If you look at the estate tax return (Form 706), you'll see what you do is calculate the tax on the full estate (less allowable deductions, but leaving that aside). At 1.6 million, the tax would be $898,300. Assuming you haven't used any of your unified credit, you then get to subtract $555,800. - quote - > Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is
Bwahahaha. $342,500.> $23,000 ( in 2004). - quote - > where is the fatal flaw?
The exemption isn't really an exemption.Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| This is a question that would only be asked by someone who didn't understand taxes much. Assume an estate of $1,600,000, I would like to know if the following general statements are correct:. The current exemption is $1,500,000 There is therefore $100,000 taxable The unified tables estate/Gift tax tables indicate that the federal tax for $100,000 is $23,800. Hence, on an estate of $1,600,000 the FEDERAL estate tax is $23,000 ( in 2004). IS THIS CORRECT? If it isn't, where is the fatal flaw? Best wishes and thanks in advance, John Baker << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| estate, tables, tax, unified |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Unified Tax Credit Question D. Stussy: ron wrote: > If I understand correctly, in 2008 I would be able to gift > $11,000 (gift credit) plus $780,800 (the unified tax credit > in 2008)... | Taxes | 3 | 04-07-2004 08:11 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |