|
#4
01-02-2005, 07:46 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: 2004 Schedule D error...my mistake, sorry! - quote - > All of this reminds me (Helen!) of Phurt (Curt actually) at
I remember that. I should have saved those faxes he sent> IRS forms department who had the major headache back > about..... oh... 1994? re designing the schedule d in time. > But he did. And maybe he's still at it. Is he? me. The two pages we now have is an abbreviated form, trust me. He is now a branch chief in forms and taught at all 6 tax forums this year. Phurt is the proud papa of 3 lovely little girls and his wife still works in the forms area. Helen, EA in PA Director, NAEA; Immediate Past President, PSEA; Tax Expert, AOL Enrolled Agents - THE Tax Professionals << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
12-31-2004, 02:30 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: 2004 Schedule D error...my mistake, sorry! Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > All of this reminds me (Helen!) of Phurt (Curt actually) at
This will sound like a troll, but I seriously suspect that> IRS forms department who had the major headache back > about..... oh... 1994? re designing the schedule d in time. > But he did. And maybe he's still at it. Is he? schedule D form was designed to not be understood. I think it could have still been done cookbook style, while making it clearer as to what is going on. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
12-29-2004, 02:09 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: 2004 Schedule D error...my mistake, sorry! AK47 wrote: - quote - > Bob B wrote:
All of this reminds me (Helen!) of Phurt (Curt actually) at> > In my previous message, I didn't read line 16 correctly > > (i.e. at all). If one does what line 16 says, it all works > > out fine. Sorry for the stupidity! > Wouldn't it make a lot more sense if they just allowed a > deduction for LTCG's as they did in the past. (40,50, or 60% > at various times). > I wonder if anyone understands the present schedule D > calculation. IRS forms department who had the major headache back about..... oh... 1994? re designing the schedule d in time. But he did. And maybe he's still at it. Is he? ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
12-29-2004, 01:31 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: 2004 Schedule D error...my mistake, sorry! - quote - > I wonder if anyone understands the present schedule D
My AARP/TCE class will.> calculation. See my annotated forms and worksheets on http://home.earthlink.net/~don13027/ -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
12-28-2004, 08:00 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: 2004 Schedule D error...my mistake, sorry! Bob B wrote: - quote - > In my previous message, I didn't read line 16 correctly
Wouldn't it make a lot more sense if they just allowed a> (i.e. at all). If one does what line 16 says, it all works > out fine. Sorry for the stupidity! deduction for LTCG's as they did in the past. (40,50, or 60% at various times). I wonder if anyone understands the present schedule D calculation. -- To e-mail me get rid of the cats and dogs. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
12-22-2004, 02:31 PM
| |||
| |||
| 2004 Schedule D error...my mistake, sorry! In my previous message, I didn't read line 16 correctly (i.e. at all). If one does what line 16 says, it all works out fine. Sorry for the stupidity! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 2004, errormy, mistake, schedule |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Should I upgrade from 2004 or the Archive mistake Jim: New to this group but have been using money since 1999. I found this group today after doing something I have never done before, archiving.... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-19-2008 12:52 AM | |
| Was buying M05 a mistake? shokat: from some of the postings I have read it sounds like M04 gets better reviews then 05. I am new to money and am wondering if I would be better off... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 01-14-2005 01:51 PM | |
| Tax Mistake - 2002 Suresh: I committed a mistake while filing 2002 taxes. i forgot to apply for the tax benefit for rented home(rent > 1000). Can I rectify that while filing... | Taxes | 10 | 02-16-2004 06:10 PM | |
| Techincal Error in Schedule A and Dividend Question Dennis G. Rears: I have already filed for TY 2003. I used Turbo Tax and it imported my Quicken data. My electronic filing was approved last week. Since then I... | Taxes | 7 | 02-04-2004 03:32 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
