|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Phoebe Roberts, EA wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote:
No. It can still work if the excess was contributed in 2004> > 6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it > > at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that > > that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? > That only works if the excess contribution was made in 2005 > for 2004. You can't contribute for Year X in Year X-1. - as long as the corrective action is in 2005 before the filing date of the 2004 return. (don't forget about any earnings.) - quote - > > I even hand carry
Always get a stamped copy (or the taxing authority's> > personal property tax returns by the local office to save 7 > > 37 cent stamps, plus I bring back the Kraft clasp envelope > > back with me to use again! > We have some plastic sleeves (which we use to carry > everything hither and thither) for exactly that reason. If > it can't be e-filed, and the taxing authority is local to > us, we hand-deliver and get stamped copies. The savings in > stamps is just a fringe benefit. receipt). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Charlie K wrote: - quote - > "6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it
Check out page 58 of publication 590 which outlines the> at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that > that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? Simple > request, and they can so note on their records." > That would be considered a withdrawl of a 2004 contribution and a > separate contribution in 2005. You can't change the fact it was made > in 2004. procedure. In short, as long as the excess is withdrawn and therefore the situation is cured, no problem. And Vanguard would be glad to hold the extra 250 if they know they get to keep it for 2005. Happy New ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Phoebe Roberts, EA wrote: - quote - > Harlan Lunsford wrote:
Just as Phil pointed out, so the correct thing to do is to> > 6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it > > at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that > > that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? > That only works if the excess contribution was made in 2005 > for 2004. You can't contribute for Year X in Year X-1. get Vanguard to send a check for excess. - quote - > > I even hand carry
I don't ask for receipts, since locally we know each other.> > personal property tax returns by the local office to save 7 > > 37 cent stamps, plus I bring back the Kraft clasp envelope > > back with me to use again! > We have some plastic sleeves (which we use to carry > everything hither and thither) for exactly that reason. If > it can't be e-filed, and the taxing authority is local to > us, we hand-deliver and get stamped copies. The savings in > stamps is just a fringe benefit. Last year I told another local county authority I had hand delivered said returns, and she said yes, she had them, and if I said I had done so before 12/31 , then no problem. savings are NOT just fring benefits. "Look to the pennies, and the dollars will take care of themselves." Wish I remembered who said that. Benjamin Franklin? Happy New ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? Simple request, and they can so note on their records." That would be considered a withdrawl of a 2004 contribution and a separate contribution in 2005. You can't change the fact it was made in 2004. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > 6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it
That only works if the excess contribution was made in 2005> at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that > that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? for 2004. You can't contribute for Year X in Year X-1. - quote - > I even hand carry
We have some plastic sleeves (which we use to carry> personal property tax returns by the local office to save 7 > 37 cent stamps, plus I bring back the Kraft clasp envelope > back with me to use again! everything hither and thither) for exactly that reason. If it can't be e-filed, and the taxing authority is local to us, we hand-deliver and get stamped copies. The savings in stamps is just a fringe benefit. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <hnslunsford[at]bellsouth.net> writes: - quote - > 6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it
Because you can't make 2005 contributions until 1/1/2005.> at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that > that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? Simple > request, and they can so note on their records. If OP waits until January to fix the problem, your suggestion makes sense, unless the fees he's going to be charged are more than the penalty. Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Phil Marti wrote: - quote - > "Charlie K" <Chas_K[at]excite.com> writes:
6% of 250 may not be so much (to some people) but why pay it> > I calculate I'm going to have about $250 in an excess > > contribution for 2004. Vanguard forms say they'll calculate > > the earnings and send the amount to me along with my excess > > contribution, but the form also says if I want to apply the > > excess to my 2005 contribution, to not send in the form but > > just report the change on the tax return. Don't I have to > > remove the earnings even if I apply it to 2005 > > contributions? Or can I leave the earnings in and just pay a > > penalty on the excess contributiion for one year, 2004. I > > realise the amount is small, but I want to know how to do it > > correctly. > You can just leave it in, pay the 6% penalty on the excess, > and then reduce your 2005 contribution correspondingly. at all, when you can just inform Vanguard to make sure that that 250 is applied to 2005 and not to 2004? Simple request, and they can so note on their records. 15$, that's what it's worth. Heck, I even hand carry personal property tax returns by the local office to save 7 37 cent stamps, plus I bring back the Kraft clasp envelope back with me to use again! As I told the clerk this morning, "see you same time next year." Merry Christmas, Y'all Harlan Lunsford << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Charlie K" <Chas_K[at]excite.com> writes: - quote - > I calculate I'm going to have about $250 in an excess
You can just leave it in, pay the 6% penalty on the excess, and then reduce> contribution for 2004. Vanguard forms say they'll calculate > the earnings and send the amount to me along with my excess > contribution, but the form also says if I want to apply the > excess to my 2005 contribution, to not send in the form but > just report the change on the tax return. Don't I have to > remove the earnings even if I apply it to 2005 > contributions? Or can I leave the earnings in and just pay a > penalty on the excess contributiion for one year, 2004. I > realise the amount is small, but I want to know how to do it > correctly. your 2005 contribution correspondingly. Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Charlie K wrote: - quote - > I calculate I'm going to have about $250 in an excess
You have to look closely at what they sent you, but it seems> contribution for 2004. Vanguard forms say they'll calculate > the earnings and send the amount to me along with my excess > contribution, but the form also says if I want to apply the > excess to my 2005 contribution, to not send in the form but > just report the change on the tax return. Don't I have to > remove the earnings even if I apply it to 2005 > contributions? Or can I leave the earnings in and just pay a > penalty on the excess contributiion for one year, 2004. I > realise the amount is small, but I want to know how to do it > correctly. likely that they would "remove" the excess contribution and earnings (the earnings are probably taxable), and include them as part of your 2005 contributions. Keep that in mind when you make your 2005 contribution, or you will have an excess contribution again. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I calculate I'm going to have about $250 in an excess contribution for 2004. Vanguard forms say they'll calculate the earnings and send the amount to me along with my excess contribution, but the form also says if I want to apply the excess to my 2005 contribution, to not send in the form but just report the change on the tax return. Don't I have to remove the earnings even if I apply it to 2005 contributions? Or can I leave the earnings in and just pay a penalty on the excess contributiion for one year, 2004. I realise the amount is small, but I want to know how to do it correctly. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| contribution, excess, roth |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| IRA Excess contribution Allan: I have just recently discovered (on my own) that in 1999, I made an excess contribution to my IRA. The excess amount is only by $500, but from... | Taxes | 2 | 04-26-2004 02:49 AM | |
| Roth IRA contribution limits ezeppelin@msn.com: My income is highly variable. This year my AGI will be somewhere between $60k and $140k. I'd like to go ahead and get started contributing to a... | Taxes | 2 | 03-01-2004 07:25 PM | |
| Unusual CAse of Excess Contribution to an IRA A.G. Kalman: I have an unusual situation that has necessitated my reading up on excess contributions to an IRA and the 6% excise tax imposed by Sec. 4973. ... | Taxes | 6 | 03-01-2004 07:05 PM | |
| Excess Roth IRA contributions.. Manish Pandya: I am filing joint returns and my spouse had an excess contribution of $3000 in the last years (2002) return. We paid a penalty of $180. I figured... | Taxes | 1 | 02-17-2004 12:56 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |