|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Stuart Bronstein wrote: - quote - > For example, say a small business grosses $200,000, nets
Remind me to sell out to you! > $100,000 and there'd be $50,000 left if the owner hired > someone to replace him. The IRS discount rate for life > estates and long term investments is about 4% at the moment. > For an investor to receive $50,000 a year at 4% he'd have to > invest $1,250,000. So to me that seems to be a good > estimate of true value. Around here, tax practicesgo for 1 times gross plus fixed assets, usually paid out over 4 years and adjusted for (lack of) retention. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Stuart Bronstein wrote: - quote - > For example, say a small business grosses $200,000, nets
I think you are confusing the value of a productive asset> $100,000 and there'd be $50,000 left if the owner hired > someone to replace him. The IRS discount rate for life > estates and long term investments is about 4% at the moment. > For an investor to receive $50,000 a year at 4% he'd have to > invest $1,250,000. So to me that seems to be a good > estimate of true value. with an infinite shelf life with a personal services' business with an unpredictable shelf life. Upon the sale of a tax practice, at least 20% of the clients can be expected to leave. So the only way to price it is based on retention. A doctor I have been seeing for several years left the practice and moved to Cleveland. He is being paid by his partners based on client retention. I went in for an annual check up. The partner I chose told me that Matt said I would never leave unless I died or moved. I sat there and nodded yes. But everyone is not like me. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > The last several tax practices I've seen sold around here
I was scratching my head on that too. but I suppose he's> > are going for 1.5 times net, not gross. FWIW. > We've always computed on gross. What kind of costs do you > deduct to arrive a net? Just general operating costs (e.g. > payroll, supplies, etc.) or are the specific costs used in > getting to net? talking about the previous net profit before the sale. And I've always heard rule of thumb says start with 100% of gross and then adjust accordingly. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > The last several tax practices I've seen sold around here
As a rule of thumb, what I do (I'm not an appraiser so don't> > are going for 1.5 times net, not gross. FWIW. > We've always computed on gross. What kind of costs do you > deduct to arrive a net? Just general operating costs (e.g. > payroll, supplies, etc.) or are the specific costs used in > getting to net? take this too seriously) is to figure what the net would be to someone who bought a business but didn't work in it himself. Then take that annual amount and divide it by a reasonable interest rate for an investment. For example, say a small business grosses $200,000, nets $100,000 and there'd be $50,000 left if the owner hired someone to replace him. The IRS discount rate for life estates and long term investments is about 4% at the moment. For an investor to receive $50,000 a year at 4% he'd have to invest $1,250,000. So to me that seems to be a good estimate of true value. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Let me clarify - the "net" I've seen used is net cash income (net taxable income less non-cash expense items, e.g. depreciation, amortization, etc.). Jason Jason Richardson Attorney, CPA Sherman, Texas << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Barry Picker wrote: - quote - > "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:
Thanks, Barry. Already thought of that and will propose> > A small time (less than 200 individual tax returns) > > preparer is retiring due to health reasons and selling. > > Doesn't matter what gross is, I'm just asking for your > > opinion IF YOU were the buyer, as to how you would structure > > the deal, ignoring any equipment which would of course go at > > FMV. > > > What percentages would you attribute to client files, > > goodwill, covenant not to compete; anything else? > My opinion, whatever percentages you decide, make it based > upon collections. You don't want to pay for clients you > never get. either 1/3 per year of returning clients for 3 years, or 25% for 4, her choice. ChEAr$, Harlan << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > The last several tax practices I've seen sold around here
We've always computed on gross. What kind of costs do you> are going for 1.5 times net, not gross. FWIW. deduct to arrive a net? Just general operating costs (e.g. payroll, supplies, etc.) or are the specific costs used in getting to net? Larry A. Mitchell, E.A. Knoxville, TN << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > A small time (less than 200 individual tax returns)
Other than the assets with a tangible FMV (f/f/e), I think> preparer is retiring due to health reasons and selling. > Doesn't matter what gross is, I'm just asking for your > opinion IF YOU were the buyer, as to how you would structure > the deal, ignoring any equipment which would of course go at > FMV. > What percentages would you attribute to client files, > goodwill, covenant not to compete; anything else? the lion's share goes to covenant and client files/goodwill - that's the economic reality. Jason Attorney, CPA Sherman, Texas << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > A small time (less than 200 individual tax returns)
Harlan,> preparer is retiring due to health reasons and selling. > Doesn't matter what gross is, I'm just asking for your > opinion IF YOU were the buyer, as to how you would structure > the deal, ignoring any equipment which would of course go at > FMV. > What percentages would you attribute to client files, > goodwill, covenant not to compete; anything else? What about nothing down, percentage of net income derived from the files over next tax season/12 months (if any write up work)? If that won't sell (grin), how about very little down as an 'advance,' with the rest based on *net* income for the next tax season/12 months? The last several tax practices I've seen sold around here are going for 1.5 times net, not gross. FWIW. Jason Attorney, CPA Sherman, Texas << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > A small time (less than 200 individual tax returns)
Goodwill is good for the seller but not the buyer, so I'd> preparer is retiring due to health reasons and selling. > Doesn't matter what gross is, I'm just asking for your > opinion IF YOU were the buyer, as to how you would structure > the deal, ignoring any equipment which would of course go at > FMV. > What percentages would you attribute to client files, > goodwill, covenant not to compete; anything else? limit that number. Covenant not to compete is ordinary income to seller but can be written off by buyer, again not a huge number. Equipment is probably tax free (or capital gain?) for seller, and can be written off by buyer, so that's a great place to put a good portion of the price. And the client list should be capital gain to seller and able to be written off by buyer, so another good place to allocate the price. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <hlunsford[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > A small time (less than 200 individual tax returns)
My opinion, whatever percentages you decide, make it based> preparer is retiring due to health reasons and selling. > Doesn't matter what gross is, I'm just asking for your > opinion IF YOU were the buyer, as to how you would structure > the deal, ignoring any equipment which would of course go at > FMV. > What percentages would you attribute to client files, > goodwill, covenant not to compete; anything else? upon collections. You don't want to pay for clients you never get. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A small time (less than 200 individual tax returns) preparer is retiring due to health reasons and selling. Doesn't matter what gross is, I'm just asking for your opinion IF YOU were the buyer, as to how you would structure the deal, ignoring any equipment which would of course go at FMV. What percentages would you attribute to client files, goodwill, covenant not to compete; anything else? ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| buying, practice |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Unlicensed practice before the IRS Harvey Hill: My ex-brother-in-law is a tax preparer. He has been signing 2848 as a CPA for the last three years. He had passed CPA exam, but not met the... | Taxes | 12 | 05-29-2004 03:53 PM | |
| Is this a common practice among accountants? Kate: Recently we discovered the new web thing called itax. At least it's new to our county. So, just for fun we looked up all of the property taxes... | Taxes | 20 | 12-01-2003 05:03 PM | |
| Practice question.... Nan Eklund: I have a lot of long-time clients who call about April 10 and want an extension. I can usually get their withholding and usually have a fair... | Taxes | 5 | 10-30-2003 03:21 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |