|
#13
| |||
| |||
| DonBa wrote: - quote - > bm30003700[at]aol.com (BM30003700) wrote:
It's not SE income unless your client is "in the> > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no > > accounting is requested by the other heirs? > I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend > it. Don't forget that the administrator fees are self > employment income to your client. business" of being an administrator. It's generally miscellaneous income, but it IS reportable. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend
Only if the administrator is generally in the business of> it. Don't forget that the administrator fees are self > employment income to your client. estate administration. The family member who gets paid for the time and headache of settling the estate isn't in the business, so no self-employment tax. -- Thomas E Healy, CPA, PC 1650 38th St., Ste 202W Boulder, CO 80301 Please send email to: tom[at]tomhealycpa.com, since I block all email at my newsgroup address. phone (303) 443-1804 fax (720) 489-3772 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| thetaxdon[at]yahoo.com (DonBa) wrote in - quote - > bm30003700[at]aol.com (BM30003700) wrote:
Don,> > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no > > accounting is requested by the other heirs? > I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend > it. Don't forget that the administrator fees are self > employment income to your client. Unless it is different in the particular state, under federal tax law executor fees are not self employment income unless the person is in the business of being an executor or administrator for estates. Doing it from occasionaly, particularly for family members does not mean you are in the business of being a professional fiduciary. Martha Matthews, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| thetaxdon[at]yahoo.com (DonBa) wrote: - quote - > bm30003700[at]aol.com (BM30003700) wrote:
Unless the administrator/executor performs these services as> > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no > > accounting is requested by the other heirs? > I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend > it. > Don't forget that the administrator fees are self > employment income to your client. a business, the above statement is incorrect. If this was a "one time" service, usually performed by a family member, the fee paid is considered Other Income, and entered on Line 21 of the 1040 form. No self employment taxes are due. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| DonBa wrote: - quote - > bm30003700[at]aol.com (BM30003700) wrote:
Oops! Hold the phone there.> > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no > > accounting is requested by the other heirs? > I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend > it. Don't forget that the administrator fees are self > employment income to your client. Unless the executor or administrator is in the regular trade or business of being such, then no SE tax. But you're right, it is (self employment) income to the client. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "DonBa" <thetaxdon[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no
Administrator fees are NOT self employment income unless he> > accounting is requested by the other heirs? > I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend > it. Don't forget that the administrator fees are self > employment income to your client. or she is in the business of being and administrator. Usually the executor or administrator of an estate is someone who is doing it as a one-time thing and the fees are therefore not self-employment income. The fees are, of course, subject to income tax however. Vida Freeman, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| bm30003700[at]aol.com (BM30003700) wrote: - quote - > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no
I don't know if it's required but I would highly recommend> accounting is requested by the other heirs? it. Don't forget that the administrator fees are self employment income to your client. Don in Colorado << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| BM30003700 wrote: - quote - > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no
While I can't speak to any legal requirements to do so,> accounting is requested by the other heirs? I still think it "necessary", to avoid squabbles between kith and kin and to avoid any appearance of doing evil. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:51:32 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| BM30003700 wrote: - quote - > Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no
Depends on the laws in your state. In California any estate> accounting is requested by the other heirs? that goes through probate requires a full accounting, unless all the heirs specifically waive it in writing. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Is it necessary to "account to the other heirs" if no accounting is requested by the other heirs? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > So your attempt to get an hourly accounting is a really good
Hey! Not all lawyers are self-centered, self-important,> first step. You might seek the opinions of a lawyer you can > trust. *YES, I know what I said! selfish jerks. I've known many, many lawyers over the years, and in my opinion I'd say 98%, yes a full 98%, are the ones that give the rest of us a bad name. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| BM30003700 wrote: - quote - > I am working on an estate tax return. The administrator has
Well, I'm NOT a lawyer (thank GOD!) but certainly any> worked very hard on the estate. > The administrator was the decedent's sister, and one of nine > beneficiaries. All beneficiaries are all siblings or half > siblings to the decedent. > Although the estate is below the filing threshold for > federal tax purposes, it is above the threshhold for > Washington state estate tax purposes, so maximizing > legitimate deductions is desirable. > The administrator had been thinking of taking a $7,500 fee > for all her work, but now is thinking of $10,000. > Does this amount seem like it is out of the ordinary to > anyone here? I realize that this is a little like asking > how long is a piece of string, as each situation has it's > own peculiarities. I've asked the client to document > roughly how much time she's put into the estate > administration. > Although the estate itself was very liquid (investment > accounts, insurance proceeds, and cash), actually tracking > down the proper custodial contacts (brokers, etc) and > determining the size of the estate was tedious for my > client. executor is entitled to a "reasonable" fee. State law usually. Whether that reasonable fee is 7400, 7500, or 10,000$ I can't say. Nor can you without any detailed information on the extent of her efforts. So your attempt to get an hourly accounting is a really good first step. You might seek the opinions of a lawyer you can trust. *YES, I know what I said! However the fee is determined, remember also, that in accounting to the other heirs, the fee might be questioned. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I am working on an estate tax return. The administrator has
There are state statutes which may limit certain charges to> worked very hard on the estate. > The administrator was the decedent's sister, and one of nine > beneficiaries. All beneficiaries are all siblings or half > siblings to the decedent. > Although the estate is below the filing threshold for > federal tax purposes, it is above the threshhold for > Washington state estate tax purposes, so maximizing > legitimate deductions is desirable. > The administrator had been thinking of taking a $7,500 fee > for all her work, but now is thinking of $10,000. > Does this amount seem like it is out of the ordinary to > anyone here? I realize that this is a little like asking > how long is a piece of string, as each situation has it's > own peculiarities. I've asked the client to document > roughly how much time she's put into the estate > administration. > Although the estate itself was very liquid (investment > accounts, insurance proceeds, and cash), actually tracking > down the proper custodial contacts (brokers, etc) and > determining the size of the estate was tedious for my > client. the estate. Even if certain fees are not limited by statute, courts may review fees to determine if they are excessive. "Jack" - John H. Fisher - TaxService[at]aol.com Philadelphia, Pa - Atlantic City, NJ - West Wildwood, NJ My Newsgroups & Boards at: http://members.aol.com/TaxService/index.html Where Ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise!= ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| BM30003700 wrote: - quote - > I am working on an estate tax return. The administrator has
It depends on many things. In most states when an estate> worked very hard on the estate. > The administrator was the decedent's sister, and one of nine > beneficiaries. All beneficiaries are all siblings or half > siblings to the decedent. > Although the estate is below the filing threshold for > federal tax purposes, it is above the threshhold for > Washington state estate tax purposes, so maximizing > legitimate deductions is desirable. > The administrator had been thinking of taking a $7,500 fee > for all her work, but now is thinking of $10,000. > Does this amount seem like it is out of the ordinary to > anyone here? goes through probate the court will have to approve any fees. In California basic fees are determined by statute to be a percentage of the size of the estate (in general a bit over 2%). My suggestion is that your administrator keep track of (or reconstruct for the past) the time she spends on dealing with estate matters, and then apply a reasonable hourly rate - in California I'd use $100 per hour. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I am working on an estate tax return. The administrator has worked very hard on the estate. The administrator was the decedent's sister, and one of nine beneficiaries. All beneficiaries are all siblings or half siblings to the decedent. Although the estate is below the filing threshold for federal tax purposes, it is above the threshhold for Washington state estate tax purposes, so maximizing legitimate deductions is desirable. The administrator had been thinking of taking a $7,500 fee for all her work, but now is thinking of $10,000. Does this amount seem like it is out of the ordinary to anyone here? I realize that this is a little like asking how long is a piece of string, as each situation has it's own peculiarities. I've asked the client to document roughly how much time she's put into the estate administration. Although the estate itself was very liquid (investment accounts, insurance proceeds, and cash), actually tracking down the proper custodial contacts (brokers, etc) and determining the size of the estate was tedious for my client. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| administrator, estate, fees, return, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Can't auto upgrade without administrator priviledges. boofland: I am trying to use Money 06 on the computer at work but I do not have Administrator Priviledges. Every time it starts I get the message that it... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-27-2006 12:39 AM | |
| Must be administrator to use Money2001 Rob: Hi I use Money 2001 on a Win2k machine. I usually log on as a 'power user', but In order to load Money onto the computer I needed to log on as an... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 08-04-2003 06:20 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |