|
#17
| |||
| |||
| AK wrote: - quote - > The second thing hurting
I agree that teachers' unions (and their PAC money) pose> the quality of our educators is the advent of teachers' > unions. No longer can hard work be rewarded with a higher > raise than another teacher gets, and no longer can a clearly > incompetent teacher be fired. problems. However, I'm not sure how ~freely~ school districts were able to reward or punish teachers in the unions' absence. I would expect some form of "civil services" rules to nevertheless apply, and rules of that type typically reward seniority over competence. Still, as a taxpayer, I wouldn't mind seeing unions for government workers abolished. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > .. . . .
As the person who posted this has the same initials as I do,> > In my political persuasion, we believe that problems are not > > solved by throwing money at them, but rather by recruiting > > leadership to solve them. Unfortunately you need to have > > the funds to hire leadership. And where leadership is most > > needed are schools with the least amount of property taxes. > > > Another problem is that 40+ years ago when I graduated from > > high school you could make a decent living with a high school > > diploma. That's all property taxes paid for then and that's > > all property taxes pay for now. Something is not right!! > There is also a problem in the schools that was not a > problem in most schools some 40 years ago. That's the > quality of the teachers. I remember (mostly) dedicated and > hard working teachers. Two things have changed that. Back > then, almost all of the teachers were well educated and > motivated women. They had very limited job opportunities > outside of teaching. So the primary and secondary school > systems had a large pool of qualified applicants, even > though the pay was not that good. Now college educated women > have pretty much the same opportunities as men for higher > paying jobs in industry, so the caliber of the educator > selection pool is not as high. It all relates back to the > Peter Principle, where people are promoted to their level of > incompetence - except in situations where competent people > are held back by discrimination. The second thing hurting > the quality of our educators is the advent of teachers' > unions. No longer can hard work be rewarded with a higher > raise than another teacher gets, and no longer can a clearly > incompetent teacher be fired. So while teaching is > relatively paying much better today than it used to, the > quality of the teachers has sunk. So it is irksome to be > paying more for schools that are providing poor results. > Sure, everyone should be paying the cost burden of educating > our young people, but we also have a right to expect > reasonable value for the money spent. It's sad that private > schools seem to be the solution to the education problem. I am merely responding to say that AK[at]aol.com is not one of my aliases. My posts will always come from glendale202-mtm[at]yahoo.com or if I am away, tempuser[at]vacationmail.com. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| "Dick Adams" <rdadams[at]smart.net> wrote: ... . . . - quote - > In my political persuasion, we believe that problems are not
There is also a problem in the schools that was not a> solved by throwing money at them, but rather by recruiting > leadership to solve them. Unfortunately you need to have > the funds to hire leadership. And where leadership is most > needed are schools with the least amount of property taxes. > Another problem is that 40+ years ago when I graduated from > high school you could make a decent living with a high school > diploma. That's all property taxes paid for then and that's > all property taxes pay for now. Something is not right!! problem in most schools some 40 years ago. That's the quality of the teachers. I remember (mostly) dedicated and hard working teachers. Two things have changed that. Back then, almost all of the teachers were well educated and motivated women. They had very limited job opportunities outside of teaching. So the primary and secondary school systems had a large pool of qualified applicants, even though the pay was not that good. Now college educated women have pretty much the same opportunities as men for higher paying jobs in industry, so the caliber of the educator selection pool is not as high. It all relates back to the Peter Principle, where people are promoted to their level of incompetence - except in situations where competent people are held back by discrimination. The second thing hurting the quality of our educators is the advent of teachers' unions. No longer can hard work be rewarded with a higher raise than another teacher gets, and no longer can a clearly incompetent teacher be fired. So while teaching is relatively paying much better today than it used to, the quality of the teachers has sunk. So it is irksome to be paying more for schools that are providing poor results. Sure, everyone should be paying the cost burden of educating our young people, but we also have a right to expect reasonable value for the money spent. It's sad that private schools seem to be the solution to the education problem. ak << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote: - quote - > "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> wrote:
Great Answer! Thanks Gene!> > I have a property tax quetion for you all. > > > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > > extremely helpful! > GREAT Question!! It gives me an opportunity to jump up on > my soap box, though just for a moment. > Most of the taxing that happens in this country is NOT about > raising revenue, it is about social, political and economic > engineering. You get to deduct your mortgage interest > because it is good for the construction industry, you get to > deduct charitable contributions because it means the > government will have to provide less help - at least in > theory. > For school taxes, the theory goes like this - you can either > pay for education or welfare. Since most social policies > reflect the principle that it is better to teach a man to > fish than to give a man a fish, the default option is almost > always for education in the hopes that education will make > the recipients better (tax-paying) citizens. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "Phoebe Roberts, EA" <phoebe[at]cottagesoft.com> wrote: - quote - > Casey Boyles wrote:
Hi Phoebe,> > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > The same reason that people who aren't on welfare this year > still pay income taxes that fund the welfare system, people > who aren't collecting Social Security yet pay FICA/SECA > taxes, people who don't use the courts in a given year pay > taxes that cover judges' salaries. That's the way taxes > work - everyone pays, whether you get a specific > identifiable benefit or not. > If you don't like supporting schools with your tax money, > you might consider moving to a jurisdiction that has lower > property taxes. I absolutely support paying property taxes to help support schools. However, I have received this question - quote - > > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed
from some of my single students and I wanted to obtain a> > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? difinitive answer from professionals such as yourself as to why everyone pays for schools with their property taxes. Thank you again for your great answer!! -Casey << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote: - quote - > "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> wrote:
This is an excellent answer and consistent Gene's ability to> > I have a property tax quetion for you all. > > > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > > extremely helpful! > GREAT Question!! It gives me an opportunity to jump up on > my soap box, though just for a moment. > Most of the taxing that happens in this country is NOT about > raising revenue, it is about social, political and economic > engineering. You get to deduct your mortgage interest > because it is good for the construction industry, you get to > deduct charitable contributions because it means the > government will have to provide less help - at least in > theory. > For school taxes, the theory goes like this - you can either > pay for education or welfare. Since most social policies > reflect the principle that it is better to teach a man to > fish than to give a man a fish, the default option is almost > always for education in the hopes that education will make > the recipients better (tax-paying) citizens. cut to the heart of problems in plain English. And now I will replace Gene on the soap box!! There are serious problems with the existing system. Across every State in the Union there are significant disparities in property values by counties and thus property taxes to fund education in each county vary. Close to 20 years ago West Virginia decided to pool state-wide property taxes so there would be equal funding to every school in the State. Sounded like a great idea to me. Anyone know how that has worked out. In my political persuasion, we believe that problems are not solved by throwing money at them, but rather by recruiting leadership to solve them. Unfortunately you need to have the funds to hire leadership. And where leadership is most needed are schools with the least amount of property taxes. Another problem is that 40+ years ago when I graduated from high school you could make a decent living with a high school diploma. That's all property taxes paid for then and that's all property taxes pay for now. Something is not right!! Dick << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| A wrote: - quote - > Because most thinking people realize that education benefits
Let's be "fair" now. "..... prisons that are filled with> society as a whole, not specific families. If not spent on > education, your tax dollars will be spent on prisons that > are filled with mostly poor, uneducated men. mostly poor, uneducated men AND WOMEN." ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:51:50 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
Thank you all for such great answers and insight!> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! Cheers, Casey << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
GREAT Question!! It gives me an opportunity to jump up on> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! my soap box, though just for a moment. Most of the taxing that happens in this country is NOT about raising revenue, it is about social, political and economic engineering. You get to deduct your mortgage interest because it is good for the construction industry, you get to deduct charitable contributions because it means the government will have to provide less help - at least in theory. For school taxes, the theory goes like this - you can either pay for education or welfare. Since most social policies reflect the principle that it is better to teach a man to fish than to give a man a fish, the default option is almost always for education in the hopes that education will make the recipients better (tax-paying) citizens. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Casey Boyles wrote: - quote - > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed
The same reason that people who aren't on welfare this year> to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? still pay income taxes that fund the welfare system, people who aren't collecting Social Security yet pay FICA/SECA taxes, people who don't use the courts in a given year pay taxes that cover judges' salaries. That's the way taxes work - everyone pays, whether you get a specific identifiable benefit or not. If you don't like supporting schools with your tax money, you might consider moving to a jurisdiction that has lower property taxes. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
Because most thinking people realize that education benefits> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! society as a whole, not specific families. If not spent on education, your tax dollars will be spent on prisons that are filled with mostly poor, uneducated men. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Casey Boyles wrote: - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
Real property taxes have always applied to all taxpayers.> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! When the value of your property increases because your local schools are so good that folks are flocking to buy homes in your subdivision are you going to refuse the increase in the market value of you home when you sell? -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> writes: - quote - > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed
For the same reason why> to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? - people who don't drive pay taxes to support highway construction - people who don't take public transportation pay taxes to support it - people who don't get mugged pay taxes to pay for law enforcement and on and on. Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
Basically, 'caus 'tis the law!!!-> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! Your education wasprovided by others who, when/if you were going through the system, did not have children. "Jack" - John H. Fisher - TaxService[at]aol.com Philadelphia, Pa - Atlantic City, NJ - West Wildwood, NJ My Newsgroups & Boards at: http://members.aol.com/TaxService/index.html Where Ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise!= ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed
They don't everywhere. I live in Georgia and although it is> to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? county-by-county, some counties have exemptions from school taxes for older people. In my county it is that way. Then again, the representative who introduced the bill is from this county. <G Carol My mind not only wanders, sometimes it leaves completely. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed
It is not only the children or their parents who benefit> to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? from public education. We all benefit from having an educated populace. The public education system gives everyone the opportunity to get at least a basic education, even if they could not afford it on their own. This makes it possible for everyone to be productive and contribute to society to the best of his or her ability, even if not from a well-to-do family. This is one of the things that makes us a productive and powerful nation. Bob Sandler << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Casey Boyles wrote: - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
From the beginning our government believed that education> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! was very important. So important, it was thought, that education should be available for everyone, not just those who could afford it. To provide universal education requires everyone to share the burden. If education were paid for only by the property taxes of those who have children in schools, it would be no different from telling kids that they could only go to school if their parents could afford it. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Casey Boyles" <casey[at]NO.SPAM.satx.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a property tax quetion for you all.
In the area where I reside, when you reach certain ages, you> Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed > to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? > Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any > information you can provide specific to Texas would be > extremely helpful! no longer have to pay school tax. You should check with your tax assessor's office and see if you can get some kind of homestead exemption that would save you money on this property tax. Wayne Brasch, CPA, M. S. Taxation << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a property tax quetion for you all. Why do home owners without children pay school taxes opposed to homeowners with children shouldering the whole burden? Has the tax law always been structured like this? Any information you can provide specific to Texas would be extremely helpful! Thank You! Casey << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| property, question, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Sold Rental Property, Schedule D Question Chris: Hi I recently sold a rental property which was my principle residence some ten years ago. I have attached a scedule D and a form 4797 to report... | Taxes | 3 | 02-15-2004 05:39 AM | |
| Complicated estate planning question for property Raymond: John Doe has three non business vacation homes (never rented) and four vacant residential lots. He was considering creating an LLC for them and... | Taxes | 2 | 02-10-2004 04:47 AM | |
| Property Sale Question Mark Stephen: My wife was just given a check for the sale of a property that her parents bought about 30 years ago and when they got divorced gave it to my wife... | Taxes | 9 | 01-21-2004 01:09 PM | |
| question on rental property depreciation Jason: Hello, I've got a question. If I buy a rental property that I keep for say 10 years. The homes in my area are very old and need updating. I... | Taxes | 2 | 08-15-2003 01:24 AM | |
| rental property question John: I have a question about rental property. I heard that there is a rental exchange? selling rental property and buying another property, then tax... | Taxes | 4 | 07-05-2003 03:05 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |