|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <Jimmy.Miller[at]giganews.com> wrote: - quote - > I had to foreclose on an investment property using a real
You said you had to foreclose on a property. This leads me> estate attorney and got the property back. Now I'm in the > process of selling that property using a title company (not > connected at all to this attorney). This all occured in a > very short time apart and in the same year. Two weeks ago I > got a invoice from the Attorney for his services rendered > and now I've got a closing set for this week. The Title > Company had to ask my real estate attorney for a document to > clear any title commitment problems and now this attorney > has asked the title company to include his billing for > services rendered during the foreclosure (he has no services > rendered for the sale) on the closing statement. > Does it matter from a tax point of view (deductions on > federal tax statements) if the attorney's billing is > separate or on the closing statement for the sale of this > house? Inotherwords does the writeoff amount change if the > attorney's billing is on or not on the closing statement ? > I hate to bother to tell the Title Company to remove the > attorney's billing if the writeoff will be the same tho the > services rendered for the foreclosure had nothing to do with > the sale of the property. And yes I'm planning to pay the > attorney whether his billing is on the closing statement or > not (tho I think this was clever of him to do it this way to > ensure payment in full). > Another question comes to mind (I plan on asking the closer > this question) is what gives the attorney the right to > include his billing without my permission on the closing > statement since his services had no connection to the sale > of the property? I think I have just as much right > therefore to ask to have it removed if I want it to be tho > if the writeoff is the same I won't bother. to believe that you were carrying a note of some sort, which makes me wonder how you reported the details of the original sale. This should have consisted of some gain, either short or long term, and likely an installment agreement. I've had a few clients foreclose on sales in the past and every single one of them was mortified when I explained to them that when the foreclosed we had to recalculate their gain. For example, INITIALLY the gain was calculated as the amount you received, or would receive, over and above your cost in the property. So if you owned a property that cost you $120,000 and you sold it for $360,000 you'd have a gain of $240,000 - lets assume the sale price was to be paid over 12 months at $15,000 per month - $5,000 per month is tax free return of your principal investment and $10,000 per month is your taxable gain. At the end of year one, you would have received $180,000 total, $60,000 was return of principal and $120,000 was taxable gain. You paid tax on the gain and you understand that. You paid no tax on the $60,000 that was the return of your principle investment. However, now that you have foreclosed on the property you now have the money AND the property and I'd bet you can see where this is headed. You now have to report the $60,000 has taxable income - because you got your original investment back AND you are keeping the money you received. The really nasty part is that you will owe tax on the $60K whether you got any cash or not. You also have to report the second sale. But the good news here is that you do get to adjust your basis in the property for the money you spent to get it back. I would recommend you seek out a good tax pro before you finalize this deal. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Jimmy.Miller[at]giganews.com says... - quote - > I had to foreclose on an investment property using a real
How the lawyer gets paid doesn't affect the tax situation at> estate attorney and got the property back. Now I'm in the > process of selling that property using a title company (not > connected at all to this attorney). This all occured in a > very short time apart and in the same year. Two weeks ago I > got a invoice from the Attorney for his services rendered > and now I've got a closing set for this week. The Title > Company had to ask my real estate attorney for a document to > clear any title commitment problems and now this attorney > has asked the title company to include his billing for > services rendered during the foreclosure (he has no services > rendered for the sale) on the closing statement. > Does it matter from a tax point of view (deductions on > federal tax statements) if the attorney's billing is > separate or on the closing statement for the sale of this > house? Inotherwords does the writeoff amount change if the > attorney's billing is on or not on the closing statement ? > I hate to bother to tell the Title Company to remove the > attorney's billing if the writeoff will be the same tho the > services rendered for the foreclosure had nothing to do with > the sale of the property. And yes I'm planning to pay the > attorney whether his billing is on the closing statement or > not (tho I think this was clever of him to do it this way to > ensure payment in full). > Another question comes to mind (I plan on asking the closer > this question) is what gives the attorney the right to > include his billing without my permission on the closing > statement since his services had no connection to the sale > of the property? I think I have just as much right > therefore to ask to have it removed if I want it to be tho > if the writeoff is the same I won't bother. all. As to whether he is allowed to have his fee handled that way, I don't know. He may believe that he is making things easier for you. Gary -- You can probably X figure out X which letters to X delete to derive my email address X. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I had to foreclose on an investment property using a real estate attorney and got the property back. Now I'm in the process of selling that property using a title company (not connected at all to this attorney). This all occured in a very short time apart and in the same year. Two weeks ago I got a invoice from the Attorney for his services rendered and now I've got a closing set for this week. The Title Company had to ask my real estate attorney for a document to clear any title commitment problems and now this attorney has asked the title company to include his billing for services rendered during the foreclosure (he has no services rendered for the sale) on the closing statement. Does it matter from a tax point of view (deductions on federal tax statements) if the attorney's billing is separate or on the closing statement for the sale of this house? Inotherwords does the writeoff amount change if the attorney's billing is on or not on the closing statement ? I hate to bother to tell the Title Company to remove the attorney's billing if the writeoff will be the same tho the services rendered for the foreclosure had nothing to do with the sale of the property. And yes I'm planning to pay the attorney whether his billing is on the closing statement or not (tho I think this was clever of him to do it this way to ensure payment in full). Another question comes to mind (I plan on asking the closer this question) is what gives the attorney the right to include his billing without my permission on the closing statement since his services had no connection to the sale of the property? I think I have just as much right therefore to ask to have it removed if I want it to be tho if the writeoff is the same I won't bother. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| estate, question, real, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| LLC's for real estate / a fundamental question Raymond: At a conference on " Choice of Entity", the lecturer listed the advantages for holding real estate in LLC's, but cautioned that the LLCs must have... | Taxes | 2 | 02-03-2004 02:47 AM | |
| Real Estate Tax Question Dave Brandman: I purchased in August 2003 a house that will become my permanent home in June 2004. The previous owner of the home is renting the home back from... | Taxes | 4 | 12-07-2003 09:42 PM | |
| LLC / Real Estate Question FE: In late January 2003, I bought a single family home, fixed it up, then put it back on the market. It closes next week, the last week of October... | Taxes | 2 | 11-02-2003 05:10 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |