|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > If you are likely to spend more than your deductible in any
I don't agree with you that HSAs are only for people with> current year, the HSA is of little use -- it basically just > covers your deductible for you out of pre-tax dollars. In > my case, my RX needs would blow the deductible without any > other expenses within the first five months or so of the year. > And I will have other expenses. few medical costs, having run the numbers on my own situation and finding it was a no-brainer. I'm in the same situation as you -- my Rx will exceed the deductible amount within a few months. But then the insurance kicks in with a 20/80 coverage until I've paid about $1500 more and then it covers at 100%. So, I pay the deductible $1850, get to put that same amount (+$500) in a tax DEDUCTIBLE and non-taxable account, I pay another $1500 in expenses throughout the year, and then I have 100% insurance coverage. In return, my monthly insurance premium decreased from $750 to $375. Works for me. Jan Zobel EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I'm a big proponent of these plans (HSAs).
An HSA makes sense if:> > ... What's not to like? > The administrative rigmarole is what's not to like. > In the olden days, medical expenses were deductible starting > with the first dollar. But now we can only deduct what's > over 7.5% of AGI. > To give us a health benefit, Congress could've just removed > the 7.5% floor. But no-o-o-o, they had to concoct a lot of > complicated HSA nonsense to get (what seems to me to be) > pretty much the same result. The amount we can contribute to > an HSA is too small to play a major role in long-term > financial planning, IMO. (Look at the price of a dental > crown lately? A nice pair of glasses?) > Then again I have an HSA, and had an MSA before that. Maybe > I'm a glutton for paperwork... I just love reading those IRS > pubs. a) you have a _really_ large deductible in your insurance, and no other expected medical expenses (such as co-pays, and the dread 20% hits when the insurance covers 80% of your expenses up to a max out-of-pocket, as is common). and/or b) you can reasonably expect to have little or no medical expenses for some years to come. With such a situation, pre-tax savings and growth can be a substantial aid in later medical expenses (which are pretty much bound to come). If you are likely to spend more than your deductible in any current year, the HSA is of little use -- it basically just covers your deductible for you out of pre-tax dollars. In my case, my RX needs would blow the deductible without any other expenses within the first five months or so of the year. And I will have other expenses. If I had many years of prior HSA accumulation to draw on, this would be great; but of course no one now has such prior HSA savings. Furthermore, I am faced with restrictions on funding a medical FSA plan if I _do_ take out an HSA: the FSA can't be used for _any_ expenses (deductibles, out-of-pockets, copays, ...) incurred under the health insurance. But if I don't take out an HSA, the FSA can be funded at a level which _will_ cover (which the HSA will not) my expected medical expenses for the year. The wonderfully cynical thing is that, touting the HSA, my only available health insurance has for next year: * upped the deductible 47%, to qualify for HSA coverage (but just barely) * upped max. out-of-pocket by the same percentage (why?) * charges all prescriptions at retail _until_ the deductible is met (when the co-pay cuts in; previously, all RX were bought with co-pay). Previously, I would be out of pocket by only a bit more than the deductible over the full course of the year for prescriptions, plus an annual physical. I'm sure the insurance companies _love_ this measure. I don't. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I'm a big proponent of these plans (HSAs). At first I
I agree. It also is about the only way for S corporation> thought they were only valuable for someone with few medical > expenses who wanted catastophic coverage. But, after running > the numbers, I discovered they can be equally valuable for > someone whose medical expenses will always exceed the > deductible. For example, my HSA deductible is $1850, then my > insurance policy kicks in. My premiums were literally cut in > 1/2 when I opened my HSA. Plus, I get to deduct my "savings > plan" contribution of $1850 + $500. Plus, I can use the > account to pay for things like chiropractic care that my old > insurance plan didn't cover. What's not to like? owners to get a deductible medical reimbursement plan. I'm going to try to switch for next year. -- Thomas E Healy, CPA, PC 1650 38th St., Ste 202W Boulder, CO 80301 Please send email to: tom[at]tomhealycpa.com, since I block all email at my newsgroup address. phone (303) 443-1804 fax (720) 489-3772 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I just want to make certain that I'm reading the rules
The IRS publications that deal with medical expenses and the> > correctly. None of my clients nor I currently have an MSA > > (formerly called an Archer-MSA). > There is no reason to have an MSA; the new Health Savings > Account (HSA) is much more beneficial. Those who have an MSA > should roll it over to a HSA. MSAs have not been updated to reflect HSAs; at least, not that I could find, and I downloaded fresh .pdf copies of "the usual suspects" last week before I posted my question. Thanks for the reply.... - quote - > > 1) There seems to be an UPPER limit on how high the "high
In two words: That sucks. :-(> > deductible" plan can set its deductible. The IRS Publication > > seemed to say that for a "self-only" plan, the "high > > deductible" cannot exceed $2,500. Therefore, someone who has > > a self-only, $5k/yr deductible does not qualify to contribute; > > correct? > This is true. However, not all high deductible plans are > eligible HSA plans; the taxpayer should check with his/her > health insurance company. - quote - > > 3) Unlike other tax-deferred plans, it looks as if there
I think that you confused deductible (noun) for the purposes> > is no way to make a "non-deductible" contribution to an MSA; > > correct? > No, this is not correct. The MSA contribution is limited to, > I believe 60% of the deductible. The HSA allows 100% of the > deductible or $2400, whichever is less. For those over 50, > an extra $500 is allowed. This is all deductible, rolls over > to the next year if not spent, and is never taxable if spent > on qualified medical expenses. of insurance with deductible (adjective) for tax purposes. Do I need to restate my question? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I'm a big proponent of these plans (HSAs).
The administrative rigmarole is what's not to like.> ... What's not to like? In the olden days, medical expenses were deductible starting with the first dollar. But now we can only deduct what's over 7.5% of AGI. To give us a health benefit, Congress could've just removed the 7.5% floor. But no-o-o-o, they had to concoct a lot of complicated HSA nonsense to get (what seems to me to be) pretty much the same result. The amount we can contribute to an HSA is too small to play a major role in long-term financial planning, IMO. (Look at the price of a dental crown lately? A nice pair of glasses?) Then again I have an HSA, and had an MSA before that. Maybe I'm a glutton for paperwork... I just love reading those IRS pubs. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I just want to make certain that I'm reading the rules
There is no reason to have an MSA; the new Health Savings> correctly. None of my clients nor I currently have an MSA > (formerly called an Archer-MSA). Account (HSA) is much more beneficial. Those who have an MSA should roll it over to a HSA. - quote - > 1) There seems to be an UPPER limit on how high the "high
This is true. However, not all high deductible plans are> deductible" plan can set its deductible. The IRS Publication > seemed to say that for a "self-only" plan, the "high > deductible" cannot exceed $2,500. Therefore, someone who has > a self-only, $5k/yr deductible does not qualify to contribute; > correct? eligible HSA plans; the taxpayer should check with his/her health insurance company. - quote - > 3) Unlike other tax-deferred plans, it looks as if there
No, this is not correct. The MSA contribution is limited to,> is no way to make a "non-deductible" contribution to an MSA; > correct? I believe 60% of the deductible. The HSA allows 100% of the deductible or $2400, whichever is less. For those over 50, an extra $500 is allowed. This is all deductible, rolls over to the next year if not spent, and is never taxable if spent on qualified medical expenses. I'm a big proponent of these plans (HSAs). At first I thought they were only valuable for someone with few medical expenses who wanted catastophic coverage. But, after running the numbers, I discovered they can be equally valuable for someone whose medical expenses will always exceed the deductible. For example, my HSA deductible is $1850, then my insurance policy kicks in. My premiums were literally cut in 1/2 when I opened my HSA. Plus, I get to deduct my "savings plan" contribution of $1850 + $500. Plus, I can use the account to pay for things like chiropractic care that my old insurance plan didn't cover. What's not to like? Jan Zobel EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just want to make certain that I'm reading the rules correctly. None of my clients nor I currently have an MSA (formerly called an Archer-MSA). 1) There seems to be an UPPER limit on how high the "high deductible" plan can set its deductible. The IRS Publication seemed to say that for a "self-only" plan, the "high deductible" cannot exceed $2,500. Therefore, someone who has a self-only, $5k/yr deductible does not qualify to contribute; correct? 2) Exactly what does it mean for a self-employed person to have "established his plan under his business?" Does that mean that it must be in the name of the business, not the name of the sole-proprietor, and automatically cease if the business terminates? The IRS publication didn't define this. The plans that I see in my area (my own included) are established in the person's own name and would continue [as long as premiums are paid] even if the person were to become unemployed (or change to a different SE business activity). 3) Unlike other tax-deferred plans, it looks as if there is no way to make a "non-deductible" contribution to an MSA; correct? In this election year, it seems very obnoxious for the Government to have such restrictions. Both candidates for president, and here in CA, the senator up for re-election, are talking about expanding health care.... I just want to make certain that my understanding of this is correct before I write a letter to my "congresscritter" bitching about these restrictions and to ask that they be changed. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| account, clarification, medical, qualification, savings |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Medical Savings Account William: I have a medical savings account through my employer. Although I do not catagorize my paychecks, I would like to create a MSA new account. When I... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 03-28-2005 12:57 PM | |
| Medical Savings Account Andre: I want to track 1) How much I have in it 2) What I have claimed on it So, would I set that up just like a saving account called Medical... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-03-2004 05:37 PM | |
| Medical Savings Account WAPHYLZ: My husband had some money withheld from his salary for his "Medical Savings Account".in 2003 This was money that he designated be withheld each... | Taxes | 1 | 01-28-2004 05:46 PM | |
| "Medical Savings Accounts" Allan Needell: All, Any pitfalls or tricks to tracking medical or childcare savings accounts (pretax accounts)? Should I just create new accounts, call them... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 01-15-2004 11:33 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |