|
#20
| |||
| |||
| What you have is a transparent legal entity in which you are the grantor, settlor or trustor, the trustee and the beneficiary. It's kind of a me, myself and I situation. Since there are no third parties involved yet, the IRS does not expect the entity to file a tax return. All the income from trust assets (those bank accounts, stocks and bonds, etc.) is reported on your personal tax returns. When you decide you can no longer manage your own affairs, or someone decides for you, then another person or agency will step in as trustee, usually one you have appointed when you created the trust. When you die this same situation will occur - your successor trustee takes over. Then a tax return for the trust may be required. As far as the agents for transfering title into your trust wanting to see the trust, it is customary for attorneys who draw the documents to prepare a summary of the trustee's powers for the benefit of these agents. It is none of their business who gets your stuff after you are gone. One of the benefits of having a trust is the privacy of your bequests. Your banker does not need to know who gets you high school swimming trophy or your shares of IBM. The banker and anyone else dealing with the trust only needs to know that there is a trust and that you as the trustee have the power to open the account, take money out of the account, buy or sell the property, etc. These powers are explained in the trust document. Don't worry about tax consequences of having a living trust. When there are any you won't be able to worry about them. Linda Dorfmont EA, CFP, CSA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Stuart Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Is a return required for a "simple" trust - one which is
Yes, a 1041 is required if the B trust will have gross> required to and does distribute all of its net income? That > is the common scenario for a marital bypass (usually > referred to as a "B") trust. income of $600 or more, or a nonresident alien beneficiary, even if the trust distributes all of its net income to beneficiaries. -- Greg Broiles, JD, EA San Jose, CA gbroiles[at]spamcop.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Me wrote: - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation about living
Other legal consequences, off topic for this group, include --> trusts v. probate, so now I am an "expert" on living trusts > :-). 1. A (slight) difficulty in refinancing a mortgage -- you might need to remove the property from the trust in order to refinance. Whether you can put it back is a legal question far beyond the scope of this group. 2. It has been said on misc.legal.moderated that putting the property in trust -- even a living trust -- eliminates the homestead protection of the property. At least in Florida. At least before using the trust, and, if possible, before setting up the trust, you should contract with a lawyer to determine the consequences. All we can say here is that a living trust shouldn't have any tax consequences if you remember to use your SSN as the Tax ID of the trust. If you get an EIN for the trust and use it, the trust has to file nominee 1099s with the IRS, but YOUR tax return is not significantly affected. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap[at]lexregia.com> wrote: - quote - > Martha Matthews, EA wrote:
Under the usual scenario, the B trust is formed at the death> > If it is a Grantor Trust (most likely for a "living trust) > > you can report everything on your 1040 as if the trust does > > not exist. If it is not a Grantor Trust (and it will not be > > a grantor trust the day after you die) you will need a > > separate tax identification number and a fiduciary income > > tax return (Form 1041) must be filed. > Is a return required for a "simple" trust - one which is > required to and does distribute all of its net income? That > is the common scenario for a marital bypass (usually > referred to as a "B") trust. of the first spouse to die. It is funded with the designated assets of the decedent, up to the estate exclusion limit, and becomes a SEPARATE tax entity from the surviving spouse. The surviving spouse is usually the beneficiary of the INCOME generated in this "Family Trust" -- but does not "own" the assets of the Trust. As a separate tax entity, the trust files a 1041 fiduciary return each year and "distributes" the income generated, via a K-1 form, to the income-beneficiary. That income is then included in the distributee's 1040 return and taxed at his/her tax rates (which usually are substantially lower than trust tax rates). Upon the death of the second spouse, the trust (which is NOT part of that spouse's estate) can be distributed to the final beneficiaries (usually the children and/or grandchildren) and dissolved. A final 1041 return is prepared at that time, to distribute income earned in that final year. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Stuart Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Is a return required for a "simple" trust - one which is
As the schedule K-1 is required, logic suggests the entire> required to and does distribute all of its net income? That > is the common scenario for a marital bypass (usually > referred to as a "B") trust. 1041 is required. (I also question whether that's the "common scenario". It's not the case for my mother's bypass trust.) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Stuart Bronstein wrote: - quote - > Is a return required for a "simple" trust - one which is
Yes. Grantor trusts are the only trusts not required to> required to and does distribute all of its net income? That > is the common scenario for a marital bypass (usually > referred to as a "B") trust. file returns. Phoebe ![]() << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Jay wrote: - quote - > Somebody might try telling you that changing the
There is a specific exemption in California law saying that> registration for a home to the trust is a "change of > ownership" as far as California proposition 13 is concerned. > Check in advance with your attorney, but I believe that it > is not a change of ownership for proposition 13 purposes. If > this happens, your attorney should be able to set them > straight. transferring property to a revocable trust is not a "change of ownership" for purposes of increasing property tax. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation about living
I got a living trust, and my experience has been like the> trusts v. probate, so now I am an "expert" on living trusts > ... > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the > living trust? If so, what form is that? other posters have indicated: forms 1040 and 540 are prepared just like before. Other considerations: Inconveniences have been only minor: when opening an account, some financial institutions will want a copy of the first and last page of the trust document. Somebody might try telling you that changing the registration for a home to the trust is a "change of ownership" as far as California proposition 13 is concerned. Check in advance with your attorney, but I believe that it is not a change of ownership for proposition 13 purposes. If this happens, your attorney should be able to set them straight. (Note: I too am neither a tax nor legal professional.) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Martha Matthews, EA wrote: - quote - > If it is a Grantor Trust (most likely for a "living trust)
Is a return required for a "simple" trust - one which is> you can report everything on your 1040 as if the trust does > not exist. If it is not a Grantor Trust (and it will not be > a grantor trust the day after you die) you will need a > separate tax identification number and a fiduciary income > tax return (Form 1041) must be filed. required to and does distribute all of its net income? That is the common scenario for a marital bypass (usually referred to as a "B") trust. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Ed Zollars, CPA wrote: - quote - > Just this past year I ran into a case where we discovered
This is not THAT uncommon. The last time I refinanced my> that a taxpayer's residence was removed from the trust about > a year after the trust was funded when they refinanced their > mortgage. principle residence (2002), the particular instrument I chose would not accept the property in a trust. I assume they were worried about "spendthrift" trusts in which they would not be able to recover the property in foreclosure, rather than living trusts, but it may be that the low processing costs wouldn't allow them to pay a lawyer to look at the trust document to be SURE it was a transparent trust. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Ed Zollars, CPA wrote: - quote - > Just this past year I ran into a case where we discovered
Bankers are overcautious these days. Even though there is> that a taxpayer's residence was removed from the trust about > a year after the trust was funded when they refinanced their > mortgage. Turns out the bank that issued the new mortgage > managed to include a quit claim dead putting the property > back in the individual's name as part of the > paperwork--which, of course, the client dutifully signed > during the "sign this" stack of paper routine. I suspect > the bank did it just because it was "simpler" for them > and/or the officer working with them was simply clueless > about living trusts <grin> . no legal necessity, many if not all bankers require someone taking out a loan on real property to take the property out of the trust before executing the mortgage. It can be put right back afterwards. But the borrowers are seldom told what is going on and what should be done. In reality the title company should be told to prepare an additional quitclaim deed, from the borrowers back into the trust, to be recorded right after the mortgage or deed of trust is recorded. - quote - > The problem was discovered years later, and the bank they
I recently had a case just like that. The spouses had> are now with (they had refinanced again since then) had no > problem with them moving it back to the trust. But had that > not been "caught" there would have been a rather large asset > that would have been outside the trust and gone through > probate anyway--which arguably would be the worst of both > worlds (they incurred the expense of care and feeding of the > trust while alive, and at death still had to pay for a > probate since their major asset was held outside the trust). actually died before it was discovered. The courts in California are fairly liberal, however, and will fairly easily give an order placing property into a trust without probate if it is proven that is what the owners had wanted. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| hlpme2004[at]hotmail.com (Me) wrote in - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation about living
This is the part that trust promoters frequently leave out.> trusts v. probate, so now I am an "expert" on living trusts > :-). > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with > income/loss-producing investments, how does that affect the > complexity of my tax reporting effort? - quote - > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the
If it is a Grantor Trust (most likely for a "living trust)> living trust? If so, what form is that? you can report everything on your 1040 as if the trust does not exist. If it is not a Grantor Trust (and it will not be a grantor trust the day after you die) you will need a separate tax identification number and a fiduciary income tax return (Form 1041) must be filed. - quote - > Is it relatively straight-forward, given that currently I am
If it is not a grantor trust it is wise to talk to a tax pro> able to do my own 1040 with those same investments? Or is > there some reason (legal or practical) why I would need to > have a tax professional do the trust return? who is experienced in doing 1041s at the first year. The 1041 can be complicated but it will depend on the trust document and the assets involved. - quote - > (Note: I am neither a tax nor legal professional.)
I am not in CA so someone else will have to help you.> Does the living trust complicate the Calif 540? > Currently for me, the 540 involves little more than > copying numbers from the 1040. If the only reason to have a trust is to avoid probate you should talk to a legal and tax pro (they can be one and the same person) to determine if you really need one. The first consideration in an estate plan is what you want done with your assets when you die or should you become incapacitated. An attorney who is not interested in "selling" you a trust may have alternatives which can save you money in the long run. There may be tax deferral with a marital trust but expenses of administration and tax liabilities are usually the same. Frequently there are higher costs with a trust because something was not in the trust or there is another problem with the document after death. Martha Matthews, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Me wrote: - quote - > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the
Well, it depends on the trust instrument. What is normally> living trust? If so, what form is that? promoted as a "living trust" falls under the grantor trust rules and the exception from having to file annual returns during the grantor's life. But without reading the trust document itself no one can tell you "for sure" that there isn't a 1041 filing requirement and, potentially, even a possible taxable entity (the latter is unlikely, but if the drafting got fouled up enough it's possible--as well as creating a number of other nontax problems, like being unable to get the property back out <grin> ). Whether a living trust "makes sense" or not depends on a lot of factors--but I would point out that generally they do require that you make sure assets remain properly titled. In Arizona, attorneys routinely use living trusts as their principal estate planning vehicles and work with clients to get assets transferred. But that doesn't mean they stay there <grin> . Just this past year I ran into a case where we discovered that a taxpayer's residence was removed from the trust about a year after the trust was funded when they refinanced their mortgage. Turns out the bank that issued the new mortgage managed to include a quit claim dead putting the property back in the individual's name as part of the paperwork--which, of course, the client dutifully signed during the "sign this" stack of paper routine. I suspect the bank did it just because it was "simpler" for them and/or the officer working with them was simply clueless about living trusts <grin> . The problem was discovered years later, and the bank they are now with (they had refinanced again since then) had no problem with them moving it back to the trust. But had that not been "caught" there would have been a rather large asset that would have been outside the trust and gone through probate anyway--which arguably would be the worst of both worlds (they incurred the expense of care and feeding of the trust while alive, and at death still had to pay for a probate since their major asset was held outside the trust). -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| If you create a living trust and implement, then during your lifetime, you simply file your 1040 and 540 as usual. It is only on your demise, that there will possibly be a different tax form filing. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| hlpme2004[at]hotmail.com (Me) wrote: - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation about living
No difference. A revocable living trust of the usual sort is> trusts v. probate, so now I am an "expert" on living trusts > :-). > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with > income/loss-producing investments, how does that affect the > complexity of my tax reporting effort? a kind of grantor trust, and it's disregarded for income tax purposes. Investment income and losses in property held by the trust are your income and losses. The only reason to have a living trust is to avoid probate. These are popular in California, because probate is expensive and time-consuming. The two disadvantages of a living trust, which may not matter to you, are (1) the cost and effort needed to set up and maintain the trust, and (2) the possibility that your successor trustee will not be trustworthy. A living trust can be pillaged by a dishonest trustee much faster than a probate estate can be. - quote - > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the
No. Grantor trusts don't file their own tax returns. Other> living trust? If so, what form is that? kinds of trust do, but you don't want to go there. - quote - > Is it relatively straight-forward, given that currently I am
Doesn't change anything. If you did have or were> able to do my own 1040 with those same investments? Or is > there some reason (legal or practical) why I would need to > have a tax professional do the trust return? contemplating a trust of a sort that required a trust return, then it would be a Really Good Idea to get professional assistance. - quote - > (Note: I am neither a tax nor legal professional.)
No change.> Does the living trust complicate the Calif 540? - quote - > Currently for me, the 540 involves little more than
Shouldn't be any different.> copying numbers from the 1040. -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| hlpme2004[at]hotmail.com (Me) posted: - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation
No. If you establish a revocable living trust, which might> about living trusts v. probate, so now I am an > "expert" on living trusts > :-). > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with > income/loss-producing investments, how does > that affect the complexity of my tax reporting > effort? > For example, do I have to file a separate tax > return for the living trust? If so, what form is > that? be titled "hlpme2004 Trust, established U/A/D 9-30-04" (and your trustees noted thereafter), the income generated by that Trust can be reported on your regular return. If you're married, and your wife establishes a separate living Trust, that can also be reported on your joint return. It does not _have to be segregated at all. As long as you're [both] alive, you will receive 1099s for the Trust income with your SSNs, and the IRS will have no problems. [Actually, both my wife and I have living trusts, and I note income on Schedule B as coming from the "A" Trust or "B" Trust ... but that just matches it up with the SSN, anyway.] - quote - > Is it relatively straight-forward, given that
No, as noted above, there's no complication necessary --> currently I am able to do my own 1040 with > those same investments? Or is there some > reason (legal or practical) why I would need to > have a tax professional do the trust return? > (Note: I am neither a tax nor legal > professional.) until one dies, at which point the successor trustee will have to obtain a Tax Identification Number for the "Irrevocable" Trust ... at which point they might want to seek some professional guidance. But if you're dead, that's not going to be your problem. <G - quote - > Does the living trust complicate the Calif 540?
Should not be any problem. State returns which are tied to> Currently for me, the 540 involves little more > than copying numbers from the 1040. the Federal return, should be filled out as usual -- since all income will be related to your same SSN. Bill << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| hlpme2004[at]hotmail.com (Me) wrote: - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation about living
Not at all.> trusts v. probate, so now I am an "expert" on living trusts :-). > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with > income/loss-producing investments, how does that affect the > complexity of my tax reporting effort? - quote - > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the
The living trust, like other grantor, revocable trusts, is a> living trust? If so, what form is that? disregarded entity for tax reporting. All income and losses within the "trust" are reported on your 1040 return, just as if they were titled in your name. The trust does not have a separate tax number. - quote - > Is it relatively straight-forward, given that currently I am
You should be able to do it yourself, there are no extra forms needed.> able to do my own 1040 with those same investments? Or is > there some reason (legal or practical) why I would need to > have a tax professional do the trust return? - quote - > (Note: I am neither a tax nor legal professional.)
That was obvious from your questions.- quote - > Does the living trust complicate the Calif 540?
Talk to a CA tax professional, but I don't see that the> Currently for me, the 540 involves little more than > copying numbers from the 1040. living trust should affect your state tax return at all. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| hlpme2004[at]hotmail.com (Me) wrote: - quote - > I recently sat through a 2-hour presentation about living
A living trust is a "pass-through entity" and specifically> trusts v. probate, so now I am an "expert" on living trusts > :-). > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with > income/loss-producing investments, how does that affect the > complexity of my tax reporting effort? > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the > living trust? If so, what form is that? > Is it relatively straight-forward, given that currently I am > able to do my own 1040 with those same investments? Or is > there some reason (legal or practical) why I would need to > have a tax professional do the trust return? > (Note: I am neither a tax nor legal professional.) > Does the living trust complicate the Calif 540? > Currently for me, the 540 involves little more than > copying numbers from the 1040. does not require a form 1041 nor K-1s (see IRS Publication 550). Leave your SS# the same on your investments; change the name to the trust name on all investments and property; continue to report on form 1040 and 540 as before. ed << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| hlpme2004[at]hotmail.com (Me) writes: - quote - > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with
Not at all. The trust is ignored for income tax purposes,> income/loss-producing investments, how does that affect the > complexity of my tax reporting effort? and the income continues to be reported under your SSN. Phil Marti Clarksburg, MD << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Me wrote: - quote - > Seriously, if (when) I have a living trust with
It shouldn't. While you are alive, your revocable living> income/loss-producing investments, how does that affect the > complexity of my tax reporting effort? trust is completely transparent for tax purposes. - quote - > For example, do I have to file a separate tax return for the
Not if it's revocable.> living trust? If so, what form is that? - quote - > Does the living trust complicate the Calif 540?
Not if it's revocable.Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| increased, living, overhead, reporting, tax, trust |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Living Trust:trust return CBres77376: I have done simple trusts before but an stumped trying to help my sister with the trust return of my stepdad who died last year. The trust had many... | Taxes | 2 | 04-08-2004 08:41 PM | |
| Credit Trust / Marital Trust simplified question Raymond: John Doe dies leaving a 3 million dollar estate. His trust calls for a pecuniary formula distribution to a credit trust equal to the Federal estate... | Taxes | 4 | 01-28-2004 04:48 PM | |
| Living trust, death, and carry-forward losses Guy Scharf: My best friend died two weeks ago. I am trying to understand some of the tax situation and have a few questions. My goal is to maximize the... | Taxes | 25 | 12-22-2003 08:25 PM | |
| New Tax Law induces increased dividend payout Frederick Jorden: http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=58638&ran=174267 The above article reports increased dividend pay outs induced by the new... | Taxes | 5 | 09-01-2003 11:16 AM | |
| help! mny database suddenly increased to over 2 gigabytes! Peter: Today i did some reassigning of "unassigned" data,changed some categories and suddenly the size of the mny database grew to over 2 gigabytes, im... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-06-2003 11:15 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |