|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > It doesn't seem to apply to shareholders swapping outside
Good point. I originally read the hypothetical as though L> stock with each other. I see this as being tax-free with > the spinoffs and with distributions to the respective > shareholders. At that point an exchange of stock between > the shareholders would be a taxable event. was distributing all of the stock of C1 to P and all of the stock of C2 to G. This approach would be nontaxable to the shareholders, as long as all of the other requirements of a split-up were met. However, it does seem that the hypothetical proposes P & G to get a proportionate amount of C1 & C2 and then for P & G to exchange shares. As you correctly point out, this exchange would be taxable. It is amazing how the "form" of a transaction can still matter so much even though U.S. tax law is supposed to look to the "substance". << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Hamlet the Prince" <Hamlet_the_Prince[at]att.net> wrote: - quote - > > . the stock exchange P and G is a taxable event no matter what.
It doesn't seem to apply to shareholders swapping outside> You might want to look at section 354(a)(1). stock with each other. I see this as being tax-free with the spinoffs and with distributions to the respective shareholders. At that point an exchange of stock between the shareholders would be a taxable event. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "David Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU" <dwoods[at]woods-financial.com> wrote - quote - > 1) If you're not a professional tax practitioner I strongly
I totally agree.> suggest you get one. This is NOT a DIY job. - quote - > . . . the stock exchange P and G is a taxable event no matter what.
You might want to look at section 354(a)(1).<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "KTAALGSTO wrote " - quote - > L, an S corporation, owns store R and store S (both stores
This is one where you need to go to a professional, as there> are worth the same and are the entire assets of L). L has > two shareholders, P and G who own equal shares of L and who > are not getting along personally. Each wants to run stores > each in their own way. P also has better credit/access to > capital and wants to open more stores. P wants to own store > S and G wants to own store R. (G has been running store R > such that the corporate veil could be pierced.) > I was think of forming two new corporations: C1 and C2. L > would transfer R to C1 and S to C2 in exchange for stock in > each company. L would distribute stock to P and G who then > exchange stock so that P owns all of the stock for C2 and G > owns all of the stock for C1. L would then liquidate. > Are any of the transactions taxable? Can a reorganization > be done tax free? > Is the cost of the re-organization deductible to any of the > companies? are too many potential places to go wrong and have this transaction blow up on you. That said, it looks like it could be a candidate for tax- free treatment at both the corporate and individual level, using the section 355 spinoff rules. There are some tests that you would have to look at, like having a 5 year active business history and others, but it may well fit. The costs of the transaction must be capitalized. Costs of reorganizing a corporation do not count as organization costs, so they also may not be amortized. They are capital expenditures that provide no tax benefit until the sale or liquidation of the company. Brian Bivona, CPA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > L, an S corporation, owns store R and store S (both stores
I was think of forming two new corporations: C1 and C2. L> > are worth the same and are the entire assets of L). L has > > two shareholders, P and G who own equal shares of L and who > > are not getting along personally. Each wants to run stores > > each in their own way. P also has better credit/access to > > capital and wants to open more stores. P wants to own store > > S and G wants to own store R. (G has been running store R > > such that the corporate veil could be pierced.) would transfer R to C1 and S to C2 in exchange for stock in each company. L would distribute stock to P and G who then exchange stock so that P owns all of the stock for C2 and G owns all of the stock for C1. L would then liquidate. Are any of the transactions taxable? Can a reorganization be done tax free? Is the cost of the re-organization deductible to any of the companies? If anyone has any ideas on how I can reorganize, it would be much appreciated. > > <BR> <BR In general S corporations can do the same kinds of reorganizations as C corporations. I would strongly suggest, however, that you should involve legal counsel as well as tax counsel on such a reorganization to be sure it qualifies as tax free. If you follow any of the reorganizations of the big public companies, you'll note that all of them have obtained a determination from the IRS giving them comfort that the reorganization is tax free. You would be wise to do the same. I think that the transaction that might generate a tax consequence would be the distribution of C1 and C2 to G and P if the value of one subsidiary was different from the other. I think that the costs of the reorganization would be capitalized as organization costs. Each company could then make an election to amortize those costs over 60 months. This is the same treatment as any newly-created entity. Thomas E Healy, CPA, PC 1650 38th St., Ste 202W Boulder, CO 80301 Please send email to: tom[at]tomhealycpa.com, since I block all email at my newsgroup address. phone (303) 443-1804 fax (720) 489-3772 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "KTAALGSTO" <maxsoi4747[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Here's my situation.
1) If you're not a professional tax practitioner I strongly> L, an S corporation, owns store R and store S (both stores > are worth the same and are the entire assets of L). L has > two shareholders, P and G who own equal shares of L and who > are not getting along personally. Each wants to run stores > each in their own way. P also has better credit/access to > capital and wants to open more stores. P wants to own store > S and G wants to own store R. (G has been running store R > such that the corporate veil could be pierced.) > I was think of forming two new corporations: C1 and C2. L > would transfer R to C1 and S to C2 in exchange for stock in > each company. L would distribute stock to P and G who then > exchange stock so that P owns all of the stock for C2 and G > owns all of the stock for C1. L would then liquidate. > Are any of the transactions taxable? Can a reorganization > be done tax free? > Is the cost of the re-organization deductible to any of the > companies? > If anyone has any ideas on how I can reorganize, it would be > much appreciated. suggest you get one. This is NOT a DIY job. 2) Without looking at the rules for reorgs, I am fairly confident this is a tax free reorg based on the situation you describe AT THE CORPORATE LEVEL. However the stock exchange P and G is a taxable event no matter what. That pretty much defeats the purpose of making the reorg a tax-free event. 3) All of the reorg costs will be capitalized not expensed. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here's my situation. L, an S corporation, owns store R and store S (both stores are worth the same and are the entire assets of L). L has two shareholders, P and G who own equal shares of L and who are not getting along personally. Each wants to run stores each in their own way. P also has better credit/access to capital and wants to open more stores. P wants to own store S and G wants to own store R. (G has been running store R such that the corporate veil could be pierced.) I was think of forming two new corporations: C1 and C2. L would transfer R to C1 and S to C2 in exchange for stock in each company. L would distribute stock to P and G who then exchange stock so that P owns all of the stock for C2 and G owns all of the stock for C1. L would then liquidate. Are any of the transactions taxable? Can a reorganization be done tax free? Is the cost of the re-organization deductible to any of the companies? If anyone has any ideas on how I can reorganize, it would be much appreciated. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| divisive, reorganization, splitup |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| New Paycheck Split harrelsonesq: Money Plus Deluxe on XP Pro. I received my first 2008 paycheck on January 15. I have not downloaded it yet (I use OFX from my bank's website). I... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 01-19-2008 03:31 PM | |
| Any way to split a transfer? Marilyn & Bob: Money 2006, Standard-- Advanced registers. Here's the scenario. I owned shares in Credit Suisse New York Municipal Bond Fund which has decided to... | Microsoft Money | 13 | 09-24-2006 01:17 PM | |
| Split Dick Jones: My monthly credit card bill expenses need to be split among the different categories of expenses on the card. I no longer can split the expense.... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-08-2005 03:18 AM | |
| Split Deposits I M S P B: I was wondering if there was a way to record my paycheck in both my checking accounts. I have my direct deposit split between two checking... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 11-25-2004 01:41 AM | |
| Stock Split Barry: How do I record a 2 for 1 stock split in Money 2003 Standard? For some reason my help files no longer work. | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-14-2004 01:33 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |