|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > My company builds spec homes and recently had to sell one at
Still, even if it's not paid until next year, (2005?) then> > > a loss. The gross sale was $400,000 and the COGS were > > > $415,630 (not including any administrative salary). Since > > > the administrative salary was an indirect cost of > > > constructing the home, can the salary that should have been > > > paid be entered on the COGS even though the funds weren't > > > available to actually pay the salary? If not, how should > > > this cost be treated when it can be payed? and how is it > > > entered on form 1120, part of COGS or as a salary deduction? > > Well now.... if the funds aren't available to actually PAY > > the salary, and accrual method be damned, why even accrue > > it? Or record it? Or is the plan to eventually pay it? > > Or was the payment of it contingent on having a profit on > > that spec house? > > > See what I mean? Just don't record it if it can't be paid. > The plan is to pay the salary next year when the funds are > available. My fear is that the salary will seem excessive as > compared to previous years and the IRS may want to treat it > as a dividend. This is why I think it should be recorded on > the books and on the 1120, M-1. What do you think? that's when it will be a tax deduction. If the corporate books have already accrued it in previous years, there will be an appropriate adjustment on the M-1. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, GC and EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > My company builds spec homes and recently had to sell one at
The plan is to pay the salary next year when the funds are> > a loss. The gross sale was $400,000 and the COGS were > > $415,630 (not including any administrative salary). Since > > the administrative salary was an indirect cost of > > constructing the home, can the salary that should have been > > paid be entered on the COGS even though the funds weren't > > available to actually pay the salary? If not, how should > > this cost be treated when it can be payed? and how is it > > entered on form 1120, part of COGS or as a salary deduction? > Well now.... if the funds aren't available to actually PAY > the salary, and accrual method be damned, why even accrue > it? Or record it? Or is the plan to eventually pay it? > Or was the payment of it contingent on having a profit on > that spec house? > See what I mean? Just don't record it if it can't be paid. available. My fear is that the salary will seem excessive as compared to previous years and the IRS may want to treat it as a dividend. This is why I think it should be recorded on the books and on the 1120, M-1. What do you think? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| John Fairplay wrote: - quote - > My company builds spec homes and recently had to sell one at
Well now.... if the funds aren't available to actually PAY> a loss. The gross sale was $400,000 and the COGS were > $415,630 (not including any administrative salary). Since > the administrative salary was an indirect cost of > constructing the home, can the salary that should have been > paid be entered on the COGS even though the funds weren't > available to actually pay the salary? If not, how should > this cost be treated when it can be payed? and how is it > entered on form 1120, part of COGS or as a salary deduction? the salary, and accrual method be damned, why even accrue it? Or record it? Or is the plan to eventually pay it? Or was the payment of it contingent on having a profit on that spec house? See what I mean? Just don't record it if it can't be paid. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, GC and EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My company builds spec homes and recently had to sell one at a loss. The gross sale was $400,000 and the COGS were $415,630 (not including any administrative salary). Since the administrative salary was an indirect cost of constructing the home, can the salary that should have been paid be entered on the COGS even though the funds weren't available to actually pay the salary? If not, how should this cost be treated when it can be payed? and how is it entered on form 1120, part of COGS or as a salary deduction? Thanks for your help! PS The accrual method of accounting is used. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| cogs, home, paid, salary, sale, spec, treatment |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Tax treatment on sale of rental property Jay Dunaway: I'm in Bakersfield where I own a building, which I'm turning into condo. I am in a low tax bracket. Does anyone know about Federal and California... | Taxes | 2 | 09-13-2004 09:00 PM | |
| What happens with Sched. C COGS error Wolf: In looking over my 2002 return yesterday I noticed an error which must have been a problem with Turbo Tax because it involves the Sched C COGS... | Taxes | 1 | 01-03-2004 03:55 AM | |
| Re: who deducts real-estate taxes paid to buyer at home sale? Gene E. Utterback, EA: "Chuckles" <chuckles@lipid.phys.northwestern.edu> wrote: > Maybe this is a simple question but I could not find a > relevant post or web page. I... | Taxes | 3 | 09-13-2003 09:12 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |