|
#41
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > ...
Careful about using "vacation days" and such as an example.> > By the same token, tickets bought with the proceeds > > of "vacation days" can ALSO be donated if the terms of the > > ticket allow it. > That is, the person sells the vacation days back to his > employer, and uses the (cash) proceeds however he wishes? > What does that have to do with donation _of vacation days_? Some employers have "leave banks" where an employee can either loan or donate unused leave to the bank - to be used by another employee for a long-term illness or other absence.... << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#40
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > Look up "mileage runs" on flyertalk.com. Some people buy
But is any portion of the ticket purchase price SPECIFICALLY> tickets and travel _only_ for the miles and associated > benefits. allocated to the miles AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE? - quote - > I've seen new computers with Microsoft Office for sale at
But is any portion of the computer purchase price> less than the price for Microsoft Office alone. Now, which > is the primary purchase and which the incidental? SPECIFICALLY allocated to the software AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE? - quote - > In other circumstances (e.g. bonds, the principal and
But is any portion of the bond purchase price SPECIFICALLY> coupons), the IRS _requires_ appropriate allocation of the > purchase price. allocated between the income and principal components AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE? ... BINGO! MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#39
| |||
| |||
| MTW <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Seth Breidbart wrote:
Look up "mileage runs" on flyertalk.com. Some people buy> > Really? So if I donate _both_ of them I don't get a > > deduction, because the purchase price wasn't allocated? So > > I buy a computer that comes with a "free" copy of, say, MS > > Office. I donate the whole thing to a charity. I don't get > > a deduction for the price paid? > No, the entire cost would be allocated to the item that > appear to constitute the major element of the transaction. > Barring very weird pricing situations (and, yes, I have seen > them), no one would buy a plane ticket solely to get the > miles. tickets and travel _only_ for the miles and associated benefits. - quote - > > What if I donate the hardware to one charity, and the
Let's assume I can, since they came separately (the software> > software to a different charity? > That raises the age old question as to whether you can > legally do that without violating the terms of the > associated license agreements. As Stuart (I think it was) > pointed out the last time we discussed this, you can > probably legally sell (or otherwise dispose of) exactly > whatever it was that you purchased. However, it remains > questionable if you can "disassemble" what you purchased and > sell off the individual components without violating > applicable licensing agreements. was not installed, CDs were included). - quote - > But, once again, if no part of the purchase price was
I've seen new computers with Microsoft Office for sale at> specifically allocated to the software, they I would > continue to say that it has no separate cost basis. less than the price for Microsoft Office alone. Now, which is the primary purchase and which the incidental? In other circumstances (e.g. bonds, the principal and coupons), the IRS _requires_ appropriate allocation of the purchase price. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#38
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > Really? So if I donate _both_ of them I don't get a
No, the entire cost would be allocated to the item that> deduction, because the purchase price wasn't allocated? So > I buy a computer that comes with a "free" copy of, say, MS > Office. I donate the whole thing to a charity. I don't get > a deduction for the price paid? appear to constitute the major element of the transaction. Barring very weird pricing situations (and, yes, I have seen them), no one would buy a plane ticket solely to get the miles. Rather, they buy the ticket to get the ticket. Similarly, no one would buy an insurance policy solely to get an equity stake in a mutual insurance company. Rather, they buy the policy to get the policy. Same with the computer. - quote - > What if I donate the hardware to one charity, and the
That raises the age old question as to whether you can> software to a different charity? legally do that without violating the terms of the associated license agreements. As Stuart (I think it was) pointed out the last time we discussed this, you can probably legally sell (or otherwise dispose of) exactly whatever it was that you purchased. However, it remains questionable if you can "disassemble" what you purchased and sell off the individual components without violating applicable licensing agreements. But, once again, if no part of the purchase price was specifically allocated to the software, they I would continue to say that it has no separate cost basis. An exception to this general rule would be developed real estate, where you are deemed for tax purposes to have purchased "land" and "improvements" as separate items. But in that case I would say that EACH item is a major element of the transaction. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#37
| |||
| |||
| MTW <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Seth Breidbart wrote:
Really? So if I donate _both_ of them I don't get a> > I would say that if I spend (nondeductible) money and get > > two "things", then they're both my property. > And, on a certain level, I probably agree. But I don't think > the IRS does if no portion of the purchase price was > SPECIFICALLY allocated between the items AT THE TIME OF THE > PURCHASE. deduction, because the purchase price wasn't allocated? So I buy a computer that comes with a "free" copy of, say, MS Office. I donate the whole thing to a charity. I don't get a deduction for the price paid? What if I donate the hardware to one charity, and the software to a different charity? What if I donate only one of them? - quote - > Can you cite anything (other than your own opinion, to which
No.> you are certainly entitled) to indicate that my > understanding of the IRS position is incorrect? Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > I think we're straying from the context of this newsgroup,
Agreed. What got me into this portion of the thread was the> though. question of whether "miles" constitute "property" that could be deducted at FMV if contributed to a charity after 1 year. I still contend that "miles" aren't property. They are simply a unit of measure used by the plan, and they have no reality outside of the terms of the plan itself. Award certificates or issued tickets are a different matter. They probably ARE "property." If you can manage to hold one for over a year, and THEN transfer it to a charity, you might have something. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
| MTW <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
I know that Northwest, USAir, and American have all allowed> > All plans allow you to order a ticket for someone else. > > Most plans allow you to order an award cirtificate > > for someone else, but they cannot then order a ticket > > for a third party. Doesn't seem that narrow to me... > The last time I looked, the plan that I am most familiar > with (Alaska) limited awards and tickets to immediate family > members and dependents. And, it imposed harsh penalties if > you are caught buying, selling or bartering award > certificates or tickets. me to get tickets for other people with my frequent-flyer miles. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > The plans generally prohibit
A few years ago I recall trying to get a ticket issued to> the _sale_ of such, or doing that for compensation; but > getting a ticket for a travelling companion, or a friend to > visit me, etc. is quite permissible: I've done it. the child of a friend. My FFM plan said they wouldn't do it - that tickets could only be issued to "immediate family members or dependents." The child in question was neither. But, the specific result is not the point. The point is that the tickets can only be issued in accordance with the terms of the PLAN (whatever those terms might be), and the plan can be modified unilaterally by the airline. If I go into court and argue that the airline's rules are stupid, I would not expect the court to have any sympathy. In other words, my rights are limited to what the plan allows, the airline controls the plan, and I have no rights outside of the plan itself. - quote - > What does that have to do with donation _of vacation days_?
I was responding to your comment [emphasis added]: "TICKETSbought with frequent flier miles are [transferable]. - quote - > It is not a direct donation of miles, but of the item of
Kindly don't try to change the subject. <g> We are talking> value acquirable with them (see above). about the donation MILES, not the donation certificates or tickets acquired with the miles. I am trying to clearly distinguish between the two situations, because they are clearly different. - quote - > OK: You have 5 vacation days accrued. Please explain
It means that, in accordance with my employer's "vacation> exactly what it _means_ for you to donate those 5 days to > Harvard University. day donation plan," the university can contact my employer and request the cash-out of a certain number of "days." The employer cuts a check to the university for the appropriate dollar amount, adds it on to my W-2, withholds any necessary taxes from OTHER amounts that the employer owes me (at least, that's the way it works under the plan as I've conceived it), and lastly the employer notes that I've made a contribution to the university and has withheld same from my pay. [No, I'm not smoking anything.] - quote - > There's nothing in the IRC or any state code preventing the
No, there isn't. And that makes just as much sense as> donation of a square circle, either. donating "miles" or "days" or any other "unit of measure" of your choice. - quote - > Of the miles, no. Of tickets acquired with the miles, to
But, once again please remember, we are discussing the> any charity that has a charitable use for those tickets, > most or all. donation of MILES, not the donation of certificates or tickets. - quote - > Or if the donation were arranged in advance so the correct
Yes, but once again please remember, we are discussing the> ticket were acquired. donation of MILES, not the donation of certificates or tickets. - quote - > I would say that if I spend (nondeductible) money and get
And, on a certain level, I probably agree. But I don't think> two "things", then they're both my property. the IRS does if no portion of the purchase price was SPECIFICALLY allocated between the items AT THE TIME OF THE PURCHASE. Can you cite anything (other than your own opinion, to which you are certainly entitled) to indicate that my understanding of the IRS position is incorrect? Or that the IRS position (as I've suggested it) is contrary to law (and, if so, WHAT law)? MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
| MTW wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
We've ordered American certificates for friends. And I> > All plans allow you to order a ticket for someone else. > > Most plans allow you to order an award cirtificate > > for someone else, but they cannot then order a ticket > > for a third party. Doesn't seem that narrow to me... > The last time I looked, the plan that I am most familiar > with (Alaska) limited awards and tickets to immediate family > members and dependents. think that even Alaska allows you to order tickets to bring a friend to you, even if not a family member. But I've never been in the Alaska program, as far as I can recall. My wife flew Alaska once, but I think we cashed in my American miles for the ticket. - quote - > ... And, it imposed harsh penalties if
That's true for all the plans I'm in, although one of them> you are caught buying, selling or bartering award > certificates or tickets. bans only certificates "bartered for cash" (whatever that means). It might indicate that if ABC airlines and XYZ airlines had the same restrictions, then you could (within the rules) exchange an ABC certificate for an XYZ certificate. I think we're straying from the context of this newsgroup, though. Although much of the question of whether FFM or certificates are taxable or deductible depends on "facts and circumstances", as do most tax issues, I think this strays from the context of this newsgroup UNLESS hypothetical, because of the differences between plans. Hypothetically, though, .... In general, would a certificate be considered restricted if it could not be "sold", and could only be transferred once? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > But, I'm not talking about the donation of
Delta allows the direct donation of miles to your choice of> > TICKETS or AWARD CERTIFICATES. I am talking about the > > donation of MILES. several selected charities. They also state that the donation is NOT tax deductible. http://www.delta.com/skymiles/use/donate/index.jsp US Air also allows the donation of miles to Make-A-Wish. The fine print says that the IRS does NOT consider this as a tax deduction. http://www.usair.com/dividendmiles/p...ityprogram.htm American Airlines also has a donation program similar to the above. They also note the non-deductible nature of the donation. And, in a twist, they also OFFER frequent flier miles for your donation to several charities. http://www.aa.com/apps/AAdvantage/Vi...Type=Charities -- Don EA in Upstate NY (Obviously with too much spare time) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > All plans allow you to order a ticket for someone else.
The last time I looked, the plan that I am most familiar> Most plans allow you to order an award cirtificate > for someone else, but they cannot then order a ticket > for a third party. Doesn't seem that narrow to me... with (Alaska) limited awards and tickets to immediate family members and dependents. And, it imposed harsh penalties if you are caught buying, selling or bartering award certificates or tickets. If you don't think those restrictions are "narrow," try this: Contact the NRA and ask them how they'd feel about legislation that limited the transfer of guns to family members and dependents, and imposed harsh penalties if they are sold? <g> I'm sure they would be happy to offer you an "education" in the concept of "property rights." <g MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| MTW <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Seth Breidbart wrote:
I knew I should have worded that more carefully.> > Vacation days are not transferable. Tickets bought with > > frequent flier miles are. > I've never seen a frequent flyer ticket or award certificate > that was transferable except under very narrow circumstances > permitted by the plan itself. Can you cite any plans that > allow unlimited, unrestricted transfers of frequent flyer > tickets? In most (perhaps all) plans, I can use my miles to get a ticket in someone else's name. The plans generally prohibit the _sale_ of such, or doing that for compensation; but getting a ticket for a travelling companion, or a friend to visit me, etc. is quite permissible: I've done it. - quote - > By the same token, tickets bought with the proceeds
That is, the person sells the vacation days back to his> of "vacation days" can ALSO be donated if the terms of the > ticket allow it. employer, and uses the (cash) proceeds however he wishes? What does that have to do with donation _of vacation days_? - quote - > But, I'm not talking about the donation of
It is not a direct donation of miles, but of the item of> TICKETS or AWARD CERTIFICATES. I am talking about the > donation of MILES. value acquirable with them (see above). - quote - > > You can't donate vacation days to a charity, period. The
OK: You have 5 vacation days accrued. Please explain> > concept makes no sense. > Who says you can't? Can you cite a provision of the IRC or > applicable state law that would prevent such a donation? exactly what it _means_ for you to donate those 5 days to Harvard University. On your end, since you have given up 5 vacation days, it means you will work 5 days more than had you not given them up. On Harvard's end, what does it mean? Whan _can_ it mean? (I'm assuming there's no employer-employee relationship between you and Harvard, just that you choose to donate to them.) There's nothing in the IRC or any state code preventing the donation of a square circle, either. - quote - > Can you cite any frequent
Of the miles, no. Of tickets acquired with the miles, to> flyer plans that allow unlimited, unrestricted donations to > ANY charity of your choice? any charity that has a charitable use for those tickets, most or all. - quote - > > You can donate tickets to a charity. The issue is the tax
Or if the donation were arranged in advance so the correct> > treatment. > Yes, you can probably donate a TICKET if it has no > restrictions to prevent such a donation. ticket were acquired. - quote - > In any event, the question I raised was whether "miles" (not
I would say that if I spend (nondeductible) money and get> tickets or award certificates) constitute a form of > "property" and/or qualify as a "capital asset." Do you have > any comments on those particular issues? two "things", then they're both my property. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| MTW wrote: - quote - > Seth Breidbart wrote:
All plans allow you to order a ticket for someone else.> > Vacation days are not transferable. Tickets bought with > > frequent flier miles are. > I've never seen a frequent flyer ticket or award certificate > that was transferable except under very narrow circumstances > permitted by the plan itself. Most plans allow you to order an award cirtificate for someone else, but they cannot then order a ticket for a third party. Doesn't seem that narrow to me... << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > Therefore, for me to be "happy" with MTW's statement, these
The "asset" is the entitlement itself, as defined by> things cannot be "accrued entitlements." They must be > something else (i.e. not entitlements). whatever contract created it. It is not the "miles" or "days" (or "inches" or "feet" or whatever) that measure the entitlement. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| Barry Margolin wrote: - quote - > "MTW" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
Would that be any different from a REBATE which one doesn't> > Seth Breidbart wrote: > > > It seems to me that if I buy > > > two bundled items, the cost should be allocated > > > appropriately between them. That should apply even if I > > > can't buy them unbundled. > > I agree in theory. However, this view doesn't appear to be shared > > by the IRS. > Part of the reason may be that there's no way to determine, > at the time that you purchased the ticket and received the > FF miles, how the cost should be apportioned between the two > components. The airlines don't simply say that a FF mile is > worth $N towards future purchases, instead they let you > trade them in for various products: companion tickets, class > upgrades, special deals, etc. Each of these may result in a > different valuation of the FF miles, and the prices in > effect at the time you redeem the miles also makes a > difference. The airline may also change the number of miles > you have to redeem for various products, and they can expire > miles. get instantly, but has to wait some period for it to be mailed? Rebates are basis adjustments to the ORIGINAL item(s) rebated, not to the item that the rebate pays for (either by itself or in combination [with other rebates]). I agree that there may be a valuation problem at the time of the original trip, but there is no problem when the miles are converted to their ultimate form. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| MTW wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
I don't like the above....> > Actually, they could be allowed as a charitable deduction > > if held over a year -- > That assumes the miles constitute "property" and, I suppose, meet > the definition of a "capital asset." I submit that they don't. > Indeed, the fine print in the 2 or 3 frequent flyer plans that > I've studied includes statements to the affect that the miles are > not "property" for any purpose, or if they are, they remain the > property of plan sponsor until cashed in. > Consider this parallel example: If I work for an employer and > accumulate "vacation days," can I get capital gains treatment on > the "days" if I hold them over a year before liquidation? And/or > can I contribute my "days" to a charity and get a deduction > WITHOUT simultaneously recognizing (ordinary) income? In both > cases, I think not. And, I don't see why a similar > NON-property/capital asset status wouldn't apply in the "miles" > situation. > In both cases, the "miles" and the "days" are simply > computational numbers that represent some kind of an accrued > entitlement. They are not "property" or "assets" in their own > right. Accounting 101: Receivables (which may include "accrued entitlements") are assets, at least for the equation: A - L = NW Therefore, for me to be "happy" with MTW's statement, these things cannot be "accrued entitlements." They must be something else (i.e. not entitlements). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| Seth Breidbart wrote: - quote - > Vacation days are not transferable. Tickets bought with
I've never seen a frequent flyer ticket or award certificate> frequent flier miles are. that was transferable except under very narrow circumstances permitted by the plan itself. Can you cite any plans that allow unlimited, unrestricted transfers of frequent flyer tickets? By the same token, tickets bought with the proceeds of "vacation days" can ALSO be donated if the terms of the ticket allow it. But, I'm not talking about the donation of TICKETS or AWARD CERTIFICATES. I am talking about the donation of MILES. - quote - > You can't donate vacation days to a charity, period. The
Who says you can't? Can you cite a provision of the IRC or> concept makes no sense. applicable state law that would prevent such a donation? This, I think, is simply a matter of contract law between the employee and the employer. Similarly, frequent flyer plans are governed by contract law between the flyer and the airline. In any event, you can't donate MILES to just any charity. I have never seen this allowed except by airlines that permit donations to SELECTED (by them) charities with which they have a business relationship. Can you cite any frequent flyer plans that allow unlimited, unrestricted donations to ANY charity of your choice? (If so, please donate all available miles to the Starving CPA Fund, c/o General Delivery, Lakebay, WA 98349.) - quote - > You can donate tickets to a charity. The issue is the tax
Yes, you can probably donate a TICKET if it has no> treatment. restrictions to prevent such a donation. Once again, would you please cite those frequent flyer programs that allow unrestricted transfers of FREQUENT FLYER tickets? But, note once again that I'm not talking about the donation of TICKETS or AWARD CERTIFICATES. I'm talking about the donation of MILES. - quote - > Therefore, the examples are not parallel.
As they say, "You can lead a horse to water, but..."In any event, the question I raised was whether "miles" (not tickets or award certificates) constitute a form of "property" and/or qualify as a "capital asset." Do you have any comments on those particular issues? MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > Are you sure you want to go there? THAT analogy would make
Huh? Conversion of zero basis FFMs **IS** a taxable event!> the conversion of miles to a ticket a taxable event, whether > or not the ticket was donated. See IRC 61. I have never seen any authoritative pronouncement that holds differently. (If you don't believe me, ask Ed Zollars. This is one of the few matters that he and I actually agree on. <g> ) The only thing the IRS has said on this matter (via a low level form of announcement) is that they won't assert deficiencies against taxpayers who fail to report such income. Presumably they can take such a position in the interest of "administrative efficiency." But, they have never, ever, ever said per se that the miles aren't taxable. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| MTW <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Consider this parallel example: If I work for an employer and
Vacation days are not transferable. Tickets bought with> accumulate "vacation days," can I get capital gains treatment on > the "days" if I hold them over a year before liquidation? And/or > can I contribute my "days" to a charity and get a deduction > WITHOUT simultaneously recognizing (ordinary) income? In both > cases, I think not. And, I don't see why a similar > NON-property/capital asset status wouldn't apply in the "miles" > situation. frequent flier miles are. You can't donate vacation days to a charity, period. The concept makes no sense. You can donate tickets to a charity. The issue is the tax treatment. Therefore, the examples are not parallel. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| John H. Fisher <taxservice[at]aol.compliance> wrote: - quote - > sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
Why do you say I have no basis? I spent a total of $1750,> > Suppose the miles were earned by non-deductible (e.g. > > vacation) travel; would they then be deductible? My take > > would be something like "for $350 I'm buying one ticket + > > 1/5 of another ticket; when I have 5 of those, I add up the > > fractions of a ticket into a full ticket and donate that." > > Figuring the _cost_ of the donated ticket would be rather > > tricky (how to allocate the money paid for the purchased > > ticket?) > Seth, in any case, you have no basis. You are not > purchasing one ticket + 1/5th of another ticket. You are > purchasing one ticket and have no basis in the 1/5th unless > you drink so many of them you lose track of reality!!!- ![]() and got 6 tickets. I might even have spent it all the same day (the day of the fare sale). What I'm purchasing is one ticket plus 5,000 "airline miles". If I go to a charity carnival and buy three blue tickets for $10 each and then trade them for a stuffed panda, isn't my basis in the panda $30? What's the tax difference between a "blue ticket" and an "airline mile"? Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| charitable, contribution, flyer, frequent, miles |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Frequent Flyer Plan Stephen Taylor: I entered all my Frequent Flyer Plans in MS Money 2005 Premium. I then switched to another system and none of them are there. How do I export them... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-27-2005 12:30 PM | |
| Frequent Flyer Miles TravinAZ: New to Money. Taking the plunge on 2005, got it going last night. I thought there was a way to track frequent flyer miles, anyone have experience... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 09-25-2004 03:29 AM | |
| Tracking Frequent Flyer miles and points Retired Coal Miner: For those who use Money to keep track of Frequent Flyer miles, here's a very useful Mileage Converter I read about: ... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-12-2004 04:17 AM | |
| Frequent Flyer Programs Jaap: How (if you can) can one connect two different FFP's to the same credit card? | Microsoft Money | 3 | 08-28-2004 04:51 AM | |
| Devaluation of Frequent Flyer Miles Dick Adams: If you'all have not noticed, there has been a serious devaluation of frequent flyer miles - like a 50% increase for miles required for... | Taxes | 2 | 08-27-2003 12:51 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |