|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Missy Doyle wrote: - quote - > belsak_cpa[at]msn.com (KenB) wrote:
Heck, I don't even give them a choice. I merely look over> > "Beth" <knuckles145[at]hotmail.com> wrote: > > > "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote: > > > > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple > > > > 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or > > > > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So > > > > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS > > > > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me > > > > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!! > > > > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper. > > > > Will > > > this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just > > > got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not > > > unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method > > > next year. > > Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the > > enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer > > category. > > > Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they > > carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I > > realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily > > assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I > > use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is > > not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as > > suubstitute for an original signature. The client > > acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I > > have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by > > me. > I give my clients a choice, but if they leave the space > blank on the questionaire, I assign them a number. at husband while my right hand fingers are doing the ramdom walk on the keypad and mention that was his pin; then same for his wife. If either asks what is the number I reply "I don't know. I'll print it out on your file copy however." And they smile and I smile and that's that. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Quickly I
For shame! This is not in the spirit of making the client> > realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily > > assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I > > use a variation of the numerical address). think that the PIN means something! The local IRS walk-in office uses "12345" for all clients that I have seen. (The IRS doesn't do state taxes; their clients bring their federal returns to the VITA/TCE site to complete the job.) My own clients all seem to choose their zip code. -- Don EA in Upstate NY << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| belsak_cpa[at]msn.com (KenB) wrote: - quote - > "Beth" <knuckles145[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
I give my clients a choice, but if they leave the space> > "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote: > > > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple > > > 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or > > > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So > > > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS > > > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me > > > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!! > > > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper. > > > Will > > this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just > > got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not > > unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method > > next year. > Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the > enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer > category. > Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they > carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I > realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily > assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I > use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is > not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as > suubstitute for an original signature. The client > acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I > have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by > me. blank on the questionaire, I assign them a number. Missy Doyle << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the
I was drug kicking in screaming into e-filing (california)> enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer > category. > Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they > carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I > realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily > assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I > use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is > not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as > suubstitute for an original signature. The client > acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I > have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by > me. and had to learn real fast how to efile (on top of losing my husband/business partner) in Feb. I learned how to do the 8453 way first and never really had a chance to catch my breathe to learn a different way. Beth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| KenB wrote: - quote - > Why would anyone not use the PIN method?
For one thing, it imposes a different, longer recordretention requirement that would not apply if you didn't use that method. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Beth" <knuckles145[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote:
Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the> > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple > > 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or > > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So > > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS > > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me > > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!! > > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper. > > Will > this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just > got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not > unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method > next year. enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer category. Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as suubstitute for an original signature. The client acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by me. Ken Belsak CPA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just
Not unusual in the least.> got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not > unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method > next year. Helen, EA in PA 50 miles, 3 days, 1 cause - Multiple Sclerosis Challenge Walk for the Cure October 1 to October 3, 2004 Donate on-line at www.msandyou.org << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple
this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just> 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!! > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper. > Will got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method next year. Beth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!! I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper. Will << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 8453 |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| CPA new to e-filing; form 8453 or 8879? David Haffey: I efiled a handful of returns last year, so I'm still new at this. From a tax season management standpoint, which signature/authorization form do... | Taxes | 18 | 02-11-2004 02:37 PM | |
| Never mailed 8453-OL Dan Harms: I have recently (in the process of a background investigation for a govt job) discovered that the IRS thinks I never filed taxes for 1996. ... | Taxes | 2 | 08-30-2003 06:38 AM | |
| Form 8453 Harlan Lunsford: Last several years about this time, I've had letters from Memphis service center wanting 8453's. This year no exception. First two requests... | Taxes | 57 | 08-26-2003 11:37 PM | |
| Re: Form 8453 Helen P. OPlanick EA: >>> In my office an additional copy of the signed 8453, along >>> with the w-2s goes into one file, I do not use the pin. :-) >>> Since this is not... | Taxes | 1 | 08-15-2003 12:26 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |