Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #7  
Old 09-11-2004, 02:45 AM
Harlan Lunsford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

Missy Doyle wrote:
- quote -

> belsak_cpa[at]msn.com (KenB) wrote:
> > "Beth" <knuckles145[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote:


> > > > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple
> > > > 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or
> > > > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So
> > > > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS
> > > > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me
> > > > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!!
> > > > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper.
> > > > Will


> > > this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just
> > > got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not
> > > unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method
> > > next year.


> > Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the
> > enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer
> > category.
> > > Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they

> > carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I
> > realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily
> > assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I
> > use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is
> > not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as
> > suubstitute for an original signature. The client
> > acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I
> > have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by
> > me.


> I give my clients a choice, but if they leave the space
> blank on the questionaire, I assign them a number.


Heck, I don't even give them a choice. I merely look over
at husband while my right hand fingers are doing the ramdom
walk on the keypad and mention that was his pin; then same
for his wife. If either asks what is the number I reply "I
don't know. I'll print it out on your file copy however."
And they smile and I smile and that's that.

ChEAr$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #6  
Old 09-08-2004, 05:10 PM
Don Priebe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

- quote -

> > Quickly I
> > realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily
> > assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I
> > use a variation of the numerical address).


For shame! This is not in the spirit of making the client
think that the PIN means something!

The local IRS walk-in office uses "12345" for all clients
that I have seen. (The IRS doesn't do state taxes; their
clients bring their federal returns to the VITA/TCE site to
complete the job.)

My own clients all seem to choose their zip code.

--
Don EA in Upstate NY

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #5  
Old 09-08-2004, 04:51 PM
Missy Doyle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

belsak_cpa[at]msn.com (KenB) wrote:
- quote -

> "Beth" <knuckles145[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
> > "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote:


> > > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple
> > > 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or
> > > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So
> > > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS
> > > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me
> > > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!!
> > > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper.
> > > Will


> > this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just
> > got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not
> > unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method
> > next year.


> Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the
> enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer
> category.
> Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they
> carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I
> realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily
> assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I
> use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is
> not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as
> suubstitute for an original signature. The client
> acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I
> have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by
> me.


I give my clients a choice, but if they leave the space
blank on the questionaire, I assign them a number.

Missy Doyle

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #4  
Old 09-06-2004, 07:47 PM
Beth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

- quote -

> Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the
> enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer
> category.
> Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they
> carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I
> realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily
> assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I
> use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is
> not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as
> suubstitute for an original signature. The client
> acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I
> have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by
> me.


I was drug kicking in screaming into e-filing (california)
and had to learn real fast how to efile (on top of losing my
husband/business partner) in Feb. I learned how to do the
8453 way first and never really had a chance to catch my
breathe to learn a different way.

Beth

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #3  
Old 09-06-2004, 07:47 PM
MTW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

KenB wrote:

- quote -

> Why would anyone not use the PIN method?

For one thing, it imposes a different, longer record
retention requirement that would not apply if you didn't use
that method.

MTW

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #2  
Old 09-01-2004, 11:58 PM
KenB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

"Beth" <knuckles145[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

> "Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote:

> > Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple
> > 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or
> > 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So
> > I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS
> > knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me
> > for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!!
> > I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper.
> > Will


> this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just
> got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not
> unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method
> next year.


Why would anyone not use the PIN method? That was the
enhancement that finally placed me strongly in the E-filer
category.

Of course I lost some time with the first clients as they
carefully settled on their perfect PIN number. Quickly I
realized it was far more efficient for me to arbitrarily
assign the PIN number, subject to their acknowledgement (I
use a variation of the numerical address). Remember this is
not an acccess PIN: It is simply the number authorized as
suubstitute for an original signature. The client
acknowledges by signing Form 8879 which is for my files. I
have never had a client disagree with the PIN selected by
me.

Ken Belsak CPA

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #1  
Old 08-27-2004, 11:04 PM
Helen P. OPlanick EA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

- quote -

> this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just
> got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not
> unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method
> next year.


Not unusual in the least.

Helen, EA in PA
50 miles, 3 days, 1 cause - Multiple Sclerosis Challenge Walk for the Cure
October 1 to October 3, 2004
Donate on-line at www.msandyou.org

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 
Old 08-26-2004, 01:23 AM
Beth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 8453 again

"Wcm7315" <wcm7315[at]aol.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple
> 8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or
> 3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So
> I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS
> knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me
> for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!!
> I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper.
> Will


this year was my first efiling and I used the 8453. Just
got a notice about two that were missing. (so this is not
unusual??) I'm thinking about switching to the PIN method
next year.

Beth

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #-1  
Old 08-24-2004, 07:36 AM
Wcm7315
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 8453 again

Well, I received my annual request from the IRS for a couple
8453's again this morning. Every year they are missing 2 or
3 (out of 250 or so filed), which I know have been sent. So
I'll just make a copy and send them again. I think the IRS
knows it's their problem. Otherwise, they'd be penalizing me
for not sending them, since it's obviously long past due!!
I'm going with the PIN next year and avoid all this paper.
Will

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 

Tags
8453
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
CPA new to e-filing; form 8453 or 8879?
David Haffey: I efiled a handful of returns last year, so I'm still new at this. From a tax season management standpoint, which signature/authorization form do...
Taxes 18 02-11-2004 02:37 PM
Never mailed 8453-OL
Dan Harms: I have recently (in the process of a background investigation for a govt job) discovered that the IRS thinks I never filed taxes for 1996. ...
Taxes 2 08-30-2003 06:38 AM
Form 8453
Harlan Lunsford: Last several years about this time, I've had letters from Memphis service center wanting 8453's. This year no exception. First two requests...
Taxes 57 08-26-2003 11:37 PM
Re: Form 8453
Helen P. OPlanick EA: >>> In my office an additional copy of the signed 8453, along >>> with the w-2s goes into one file, I do not use the pin. :-) >>> Since this is not...
Taxes 1 08-15-2003 12:26 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35 AM.