|
#15
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > > Sometimes clergy returns present
I guess it depends on your definition of the word "rare."> > > > > interesting ethical issues. > > > > Interesting. I specialize in clergy and religious workers > > > > tax returns, and I have yet to run into an "intereting > > > > ethical issue." I am glad they are rare and I have not had > > > > to deal with any. > > > Clergy are fallible just as the rest of us mortals. Locally > > > we have a minister charged with tax fraud, another charged > > > with child neglect, and another convicted of child > > > molestation. You are blessed to have such a clientele. > > I agree that I have been fortunate, however, I also maintain > > that in the 400,000+ churches in the United States that the > > above examples are the exception not the norm. > Pardon me for being late here, but while these "situations" > are not the norm, they are far from being (rare) exceptions. > If you get my drift. Would that be 1% or what? Is that sort of like, it depends on what "is" means? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Jenny wrote: - quote - > "rod" <rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu> wrote:
Just a minor point maybe, but this is not a moral question,> > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question. > > > This is the pastors situation. > > > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > > "parsonage?". > > > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > > > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? > if only his name is on the title, legally 80k profit belongs > to him. another question is who put downpayment for the > church. Whose names were on the title of church. Church was > incorporated? > In any case, 80k should be returned to the church morally > speaking. rather one of ethics. chEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > > Sometimes clergy returns present
Pardon me for being late here, but while these "situations"> > > > interesting ethical issues. > > > Interesting. I specialize in clergy and religious workers > > > tax returns, and I have yet to run into an "intereting > > > ethical issue." I am glad they are rare and I have not had > > > to deal with any. > > Clergy are fallible just as the rest of us mortals. Locally > > we have a minister charged with tax fraud, another charged > > with child neglect, and another convicted of child > > molestation. You are blessed to have such a clientele. > I agree that I have been fortunate, however, I also maintain > that in the 400,000+ churches in the United States that the > above examples are the exception not the norm. are not the norm, they are far from being (rare) exceptions. If you get my drift. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > Sometimes clergy returns present
I agree that I have been fortunate, however, I also maintain> > > interesting ethical issues. > > Interesting. I specialize in clergy and religious workers > > tax returns, and I have yet to run into an "intereting > > ethical issue." I am glad they are rare and I have not had > > to deal with any. > Clergy are fallible just as the rest of us mortals. Locally > we have a minister charged with tax fraud, another charged > with child neglect, and another convicted of child > molestation. You are blessed to have such a clientele. that in the 400,000+ churches in the United States that the above examples are the exception not the norm. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "rod" <rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu> wrote - quote - > the cloth". I have been around church for 25 years and I am
I used to keep books for a church. Seeing what goes on> so disenheartened by what I have seen go on. behind the scenes in church is sorta like seeing how sausages are made. I'd imagine whoever handles the business affairs could tell you who owned what when. If the church initially paid for the property, of course it would belong to the church. If the church subsequently sold the property to the pastor, well, there you have it . . . But since there are so many "ifs" involved, we really don't know for sure . . . -Tock << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| GenFinSvcs wrote: - quote - > > Sometimes clergy returns present
Clergy are fallible just as the rest of us mortals. Locally> > interesting ethical issues. > Interesting. I specialize in clergy and religious workers > tax returns, and I have yet to run into an "intereting > ethical issue." I am glad they are rare and I have not had > to deal with any. we have a minister charged with tax fraud, another charged with child neglect, and another convicted of child molestation. You are blessed to have such a clientele. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I really appreciate everyones responses. I will try to clarify some things. First of all, this "pastor" is an in-law to me. Second of all, I use to belong to the church, until he got greedy and power hungry. I was one of the original 10 as an original co-signer. Am I asking this stuff out of revenge? Not really, I think I am past that, I am asking more out of concern for people that are continually getting screwed by these so called "men of the cloth". I have been around church for 25 years and I am so disenheartened by what I have seen go on. The way he made 80k on this sale was pure manipulation of the seller. He was presently renting the house and simple talked the sellers into a rock bottom price. The housing prices in this area have sky rocketed and he knew it. I am assuming that the pastor took out the entire loan in the name of the church. I know he does not have the credit to even get a car loan, so everything was put under the church name. How the paperwork is manipulated in the background I dont know...but I want to find out. That is the short and long of it...again thanks for your responses. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Sometimes clergy returns present
Interesting. I specialize in clergy and religious workers> interesting ethical issues. tax returns, and I have yet to run into an "intereting ethical issue." I am glad they are rare and I have not had to deal with any. Mike << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "rod" <rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu> wrote: - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
if only his name is on the title, legally 80k profit belongs> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? to him. another question is who put downpayment for the church. Whose names were on the title of church. Church was incorporated? In any case, 80k should be returned to the church morally speaking. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| rod wrote: - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
While it would depend on how the purchase is documented,> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? when a church buys a parsonage it would own it and profit from any increase in value. Sometimes clergy returns present interesting ethical issues. And folks knock business ethics. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu (rod) wrote: - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
Who owns the house? Who is liable on the mortgage?> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? The church or him? Katie in San Diego << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "rod" <rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu> wrote: - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
Let me rephrase your situation - a man bought a grocery> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? store 7 years ago and had 10 people cosign the loan. This year he refinanced, took the 9 others off the loan, took out $130K cash and bought the house he was renting and living in as his residence. Then he sold the residence for an $80K profit. Who does the $80K belong to, the man or the grocery store? The problem with your question - and my silliness - lies in the underlying factors which we don't have. We don't know who owned the building; it could have been the minister personally (nothing against a minister owning property), it could have been "The Church" - we simply don't know. We also don't know how the residence was owned - by the minister personally or by the church. SIDE NOTE - I am a bit leery about anyone who can make an $80K profit on a residence held less than 1 year, but there are parts of the county that this is happening in. Consequently, we don't know where the gain should be reported. May we ask what your concern is? Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "rod" <rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu> wrote: - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
Really not a tax question. It's a question of real> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? estate/banking law. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "rod" <rwilsonsr[at]foundation.uconn.edu> wrote: - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
I'm guessing this is far more a legal question than a tax> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? question. Even if he owned the funds he received in the refi, and so bought the house with his own money, there is still an argument for fraud on buying at below market value. Seems at best if he now pays the church back the $130,000 he "borrowed" to buy the house, at best the gain on the sale is a short term capital gain. It wasn't his when he lived there before. But the whole thing is more a matter for a lawyer than for tax. First you have to determine what belongs to whom. Jo << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
The church.> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? The above scenario is not unusual, assuming that the church was the title holder on all the above. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question.
I am under the the impression that the in return for the> This is the pastors situation. > He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 > people sign for the loan. This year he decided to > refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the > building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the > building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got > everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra > 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, > "parsonage?". > A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and > stands to profit about 80k from the sale. > Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? for the piviledge of being a 501(c)(3), the profits of the 501(C)(3) may not accrue to to any other entity expect for reasonable expenses. The church owned the the church building. The church refinanced the the church building and used to cash out to purchase the parsonage. The church is now selling the parsonage. All funds from the sale of the parsonage belong to the church. Amaxing as it may sound the are record at the office of the county assessor. Check out those records before porceeding further. Please excuse my spelling errors as I am on Percaset and my child bride wife will not buy alchohol for me i. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi all, I have a clergy/tax related question. This is the pastors situation. He bought a building for a church 7 years ago, he had 10 people sign for the loan. This year he decided to refinance. The pastor went to the bank, refinanced the building, I believe the refi went through mostly because the building is apprased at twice what he paid for it, this got everyones name off the initial loan and he took out an extra 130k in the refi to buy the house he was renting, "parsonage?". A couple of weeks ago he put the house up for sale and stands to profit about 80k from the sale. Who does the 80k belong to? The church or him? Thanks R << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| crooked, minister |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Best way to handle minister's housing allowance? Dick Watson: I'd probably do what you suggest with one modification. At the end of the year, if there is unspent allowance, put in a paycheck with a negative... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 05-31-2004 06:49 PM | |
| "minister" question Elizabeth A Brennan, EA: Client is a professor (of a secular subject) at a religious university of a major denomination. He completed the necessary course work to be... | Taxes | 4 | 09-18-2003 04:26 AM | |
| Minister and UBI Dick Adams: As a result of surgery, an ordained minister has lost his voice. He has been assigned to administrative only responsibities. In his new... | Taxes | 1 | 08-19-2003 02:26 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |