|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Arthur Kamlet wrote:
We might be talking about> > Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: > > > Chris wrote: > > > > About 4 years ago, I did some consulting work for which I received > > > > part of my compensation in the form of a stock grant. Because of a > > > > misunderstanding on the part of my client, whose accounting department > > > In general, the holding period of a stock includes the > > > holding period of the option to buy the stock. > > I would agree the holding period of underlying options > > include the holding period of the stock, as is true for > > covered calls, but where is a cite for the holding period of > > the stock to include the holding period of the options? > Apologies. I can't find anything about that at the moment. > However -- if the company actually did issue an option, and > it was recently exercised, and then the stock was sold, > then: > 1. The value of the option should have been included as > payment when the option was originally granted. > and > 2. A. If the exchange of option for stock is considered a > non-taxable event, the basis and holding period carry over, > so the resulting sale is long term. i) Non-Statutory Employer stock options (NQSOs) or ii) Statutory Employer Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) for i) NQSOs, upon exercise the Bargain Element (difference between market value on exercise and exercise price) is ordinary income, added to the wages line of the W-2, and the cost basis is the Sum of (Bargain Element plus exercise Price) = Market Value Subsequent sale of the stock acquired by exercise, whether years later or milliseconds later, is long or short term depending on holding period which began with exercise. for ii) ISOs, exercise after 1 year of options vesting suspends treatment of the bargain element until sale of the stock. If sold within 1 year of exercise (within 2 years of vesting) the tax treatment follows that for NQSOs. If sold after that holding period then cost basis is exercise price only. Thus for ISOs only, held the requisite amount of time, sale of stock must, under current regulations, be long term. So a major advantage of ISOs over NQSOs is that if held the full > two years from vesting and > one year from exercise, the bargain element is converted from ordinary income into capital gains, and deferred until sale. And if these are not employer stock options, feel free to ignore the entire exchange. Then there might be the entire discussion of whether these are actually nontaxable options or taxable or nontaxable rights. It's been a long tme since I've dealt with taxable rights. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Arthur Kamlet wrote: - quote - > Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote:
Apologies. I can't find anything about that at the moment.> > Chris wrote: > > > About 4 years ago, I did some consulting work for which I received > > > part of my compensation in the form of a stock grant. Because of a > > > misunderstanding on the part of my client, whose accounting department > > In general, the holding period of a stock includes the > > holding period of the option to buy the stock. > I would agree the holding period of underlying options > include the holding period of the stock, as is true for > covered calls, but where is a cite for the holding period of > the stock to include the holding period of the options? However -- if the company actually did issue an option, and it was recently exercised, and then the stock was sold, then: 1. The value of the option should have been included as payment when the option was originally granted. and 2. A. If the exchange of option for stock is considered a non-taxable event, the basis and holding period carry over, so the resulting sale is long term. or 2. B. If the exchange of option for stock is considered a taxable event, then exchange should be reported as long term capital gains at that time. Any change in the value of the stock between the exercise and the sale is then short-term. I can't presently track down which of A or B is correct. - quote - > Does making these employer options change anything?
I thought OP was a contractor.<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Chris wrote:
I would agree the holding period of underlying options> > About 4 years ago, I did some consulting work for which I received > > part of my compensation in the form of a stock grant. Because of a > > misunderstanding on the part of my client, whose accounting department > In general, the holding period of a stock includes the > holding period of the option to buy the stock. include the holding period of the stock, as is true for covered calls, but where is a cite for the holding period of the stock to include the holding period of the options? Does making these employer options change anything? __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Chris wrote: - quote - > About 4 years ago, I did some consulting work for which I received
In general, the holding period of a stock includes the> part of my compensation in the form of a stock grant. Because of a > misunderstanding on the part of my client, whose accounting department > recorded my compensation as options, rather than as a stock grant, I > didn't actually receive a stock certificate until May 2 of this year. > On my original invoices that I had submitted, I noted the shares to be > received. > The company is going public this week, and I'm wondering if, > for the purpose of considering long- and short-term capital > gains, is the start date the date of my original invoices > (since that's when the shares were earned), or is it the > date they issued the stock certificate (May 2 of this year). holding period of the option to buy the stock. So, in this case, the holding period would start when the options were issued. When the shares were earned is irrelevant. - quote - > Along the same lines, what are the income tax implications
There are still some unclear points. If the company> of receiving these shares? They were based on the company's > strike price at the time of the work ($3.50/share, 5000 > shares). Should I have paid income tax on them 4 years ago, > or does that come into play this year now that I've actually > received the stock? recorded it as a 0-cost option to buy, the "exercise" of the option has no tax consequences, so you still should have reported the shares as income at the time the options were issued. If accrual, you should have reported them as income when you did the work. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Chris" <google[at]deheer.com> wrote: - quote - > About 4 years ago, I did some consulting work for which I received
I don't know if there is a hard fast answer to this. My opinion FWIW is> part of my compensation in the form of a stock grant. Because of a > misunderstanding on the part of my client, whose accounting department > recorded my compensation as options, rather than as a stock grant, I > didn't actually receive a stock certificate until May 2 of this year. > On my original invoices that I had submitted, I noted the shares to be > received. > The company is going public this week, and I'm wondering if, > for the purpose of considering long- and short-term capital > gains, is the start date the date of my original invoices > (since that's when the shares were earned), or is it the > date they issued the stock certificate (May 2 of this year). > Along the same lines, what are the income tax implications > of receiving these shares? They were based on the company's > strike price at the time of the work ($3.50/share, 5000 > shares). Should I have paid income tax on them 4 years ago, > or does that come into play this year now that I've actually > received the stock? that your start date is the day after you were credited with owning the stock. Although you SHOULD have owned it earlier, the fact is you didn't. You should be taxed on the stock this year, if you sell it is a short-tem event. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Norwood, MA 02062 www.woods-financial.com << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| About 4 years ago, I did some consulting work for which I received part of my compensation in the form of a stock grant. Because of a misunderstanding on the part of my client, whose accounting department recorded my compensation as options, rather than as a stock grant, I didn't actually receive a stock certificate until May 2 of this year. On my original invoices that I had submitted, I noted the shares to be received. The company is going public this week, and I'm wondering if, for the purpose of considering long- and short-term capital gains, is the start date the date of my original invoices (since that's when the shares were earned), or is it the date they issued the stock certificate (May 2 of this year). Along the same lines, what are the income tax implications of receiving these shares? They were based on the company's strike price at the time of the work ($3.50/share, 5000 shares). Should I have paid income tax on them 4 years ago, or does that come into play this year now that I've actually received the stock? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| capital, date, gains, longterm, start |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Long/short term cap gains between accounts W': I have a problem with the cap gains reporting... Investments purchased in one account are then transferred to a second account. In the second... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 11-18-2006 12:03 AM | |
| Short-term capital gains dividends from mutual fund? Bob B: If a mutual fund identifies a portion of its dividend as short-term capital gains, should that be treated as a short term capital gain or as an... | Taxes | 1 | 02-22-2004 12:36 AM | |
| 2004 Strategy Question: Have a substantial long-term capital loss carryover sinc720d: I have a decent sized (over $10K) LONG-TERM capital loss carryover heading into 2004. The loss comes from stock held for close to 3 years. ... | Taxes | 2 | 01-07-2004 02:36 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |