|
#2
| |||
| |||
| skasselea[at]taxes.com (Steve_Kassel_EA) wrote: - quote - > I have a very interesting case in San Mateo County, CA. IRS
IRM 5.12.3.5 has the language that provides for a situation> requested a lien filing a few weeks ago. Apparently, San > Mateo County is taking 45 days to actually record those > liens. This has been confirmed by the Revenue Officer and by > the Taxpayer Advocate in Oakland. Couple of weeks ago, the > taxpayer sold their home and voluntarily paid off the > liability in full (the lien had not been recorded when the > home closed so it wasn't paid off through the escrow). > Ironically enough, on this same taxpayer, we have a > Collection Due Process hearing and an Application for > Taxpayer Assistance Order in process for an ENTIRELY > DIFFERENT REASON having to do with a written promise that > the IRS would not file the lien. The Taxpayer Advocate wants > SB/SE to withdrawal the lien, but they are refusing to do > so. We may get a TAO issued to withdraw the lien. > Now, back to the primary purpose of this post. We strongly > believe that if the San Mateo County Recorder records this > lien, we have a very strong case against the IRS for an > illegal lien filing. We believe the IRS MUST find a way to > physically pull the lien so that it is not recorded. A > release isn't acceptable. It must not be recorded at all. > Since the sole purpose of a lien is to protect the > government's interest and there is NO liability remaining > and thus no interest to protect, it would be a very serious > violation of the taxpayer's rights to record this lien. It > is not the fault of the taxpayer that it is taking a very > long time to actually record the lien. > I also happen to know the County Recorder personally and we > will be showing him documents to prove that no liability > exists. Hopefully, I can convince him that knowingly > recording what amounts to a false lien could expose the > county to legal action as well. > Comments? like yours. It actually happens all too frequently. As you indicated, it is a timing problem. The request for the filing of the FTL is made by the R.O. or ACS. It takes a certain amount of time for the lien to be prepared, the check to the county to be written and the information to be submitted to the county for the recording. Then, as you stated, the county takes their time to do the actual recording. Your client got caught in that timeline problem. If you can prove that the lien was recorded AFTER the tax was paid, you have the right to ask for a manual release that you or your client can go record yourself. You also have the right to ask for a letter from the IRS to the 3 credit reporting agencies to notify them that the lien was filed inadvertantly and is now released. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Steve_Kassel_EA wrote: - quote - > I have a very interesting case in San Mateo County, CA. IRS
If as of the date that the IRS had presented the lien at the> requested a lien filing a few weeks ago. Apparently, San > Mateo County is taking 45 days to actually record those > liens. This has been confirmed by the Revenue Officer and by > the Taxpayer Advocate in Oakland. Couple of weeks ago, the > taxpayer sold their home and voluntarily paid off the > liability in full (the lien had not been recorded when the > home closed so it wasn't paid off through the escrow). > Ironically enough, on this same taxpayer, we have a > Collection Due Process hearing and an Application for > Taxpayer Assistance Order in process for an ENTIRELY > DIFFERENT REASON having to do with a written promise that > the IRS would not file the lien. The Taxpayer Advocate wants > SB/SE to withdrawal the lien, but they are refusing to do > so. We may get a TAO issued to withdraw the lien. > Now, back to the primary purpose of this post. We strongly > believe that if the San Mateo County Recorder records this > lien, we have a very strong case against the IRS for an > illegal lien filing. We believe the IRS MUST find a way to > physically pull the lien so that it is not recorded. A > release isn't acceptable. It must not be recorded at all. > Since the sole purpose of a lien is to protect the > government's interest and there is NO liability remaining > and thus no interest to protect, it would be a very serious > violation of the taxpayer's rights to record this lien. It > is not the fault of the taxpayer that it is taking a very > long time to actually record the lien. > I also happen to know the County Recorder personally and we > will be showing him documents to prove that no liability > exists. Hopefully, I can convince him that knowingly > recording what amounts to a false lien could expose the > county to legal action as well. > Comments? County Recorder's Office for filing, the liability had not been paid, then the IRS HAS THE RIGHT (within the limits of the other rules) to have it recorded even if it has been paid since. However, they also now must have a document pending indicating that the liability is paid in full (either a release or other statement indicating such) since it has been. The recourse that you want is proper ONLY if the payment of the liability occurred before the date that the lien was presented for filing. From your text, it appears that your client's escrow date was AFTER the IRS had visited the Recorder's Office. The only other choice is to show that the lien was filed prematurely (but your story implies that such was not the case - unless the scheduling of a CDP hearing requires suspension of unrelated enforcement matters against the same taxpayer from other issues). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Steve_Kassel_EA wrote: - quote - > Ironically enough, on this same taxpayer, we have a
If the IRS insists on recording the lien, the only thing I> Collection Due Process hearing and an Application for > Taxpayer Assistance Order in process for an ENTIRELY > DIFFERENT REASON having to do with a written promise that > the IRS would not file the lien. The Taxpayer Advocate wants > SB/SE to withdrawal the lien, but they are refusing to do > so. We may get a TAO issued to withdraw the lien. > Now, back to the primary purpose of this post. We strongly > believe that if the San Mateo County Recorder records this > lien, we have a very strong case against the IRS for an > illegal lien filing. We believe the IRS MUST find a way to > physically pull the lien so that it is not recorded. A > release isn't acceptable. It must not be recorded at all. > Since the sole purpose of a lien is to protect the > government's interest and there is NO liability remaining > and thus no interest to protect, it would be a very serious > violation of the taxpayer's rights to record this lien. It > is not the fault of the taxpayer that it is taking a very > long time to actually record the lien. can think of to be sure it's not recorded is to go to court and ask for an injunction. It's possible that you could do that in state court, but I'm not sure off the top of my head. You might have to go to federal court. I`'m not far from San Mateo - let me know if you have any other questions I might be able to help with. Good luck. Stu << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a very interesting case in San Mateo County, CA. IRS requested a lien filing a few weeks ago. Apparently, San Mateo County is taking 45 days to actually record those liens. This has been confirmed by the Revenue Officer and by the Taxpayer Advocate in Oakland. Couple of weeks ago, the taxpayer sold their home and voluntarily paid off the liability in full (the lien had not been recorded when the home closed so it wasn't paid off through the escrow). Ironically enough, on this same taxpayer, we have a Collection Due Process hearing and an Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order in process for an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT REASON having to do with a written promise that the IRS would not file the lien. The Taxpayer Advocate wants SB/SE to withdrawal the lien, but they are refusing to do so. We may get a TAO issued to withdraw the lien. Now, back to the primary purpose of this post. We strongly believe that if the San Mateo County Recorder records this lien, we have a very strong case against the IRS for an illegal lien filing. We believe the IRS MUST find a way to physically pull the lien so that it is not recorded. A release isn't acceptable. It must not be recorded at all. Since the sole purpose of a lien is to protect the government's interest and there is NO liability remaining and thus no interest to protect, it would be a very serious violation of the taxpayer's rights to record this lien. It is not the fault of the taxpayer that it is taking a very long time to actually record the lien. I also happen to know the County Recorder personally and we will be showing him documents to prove that no liability exists. Hopefully, I can convince him that knowingly recording what amounts to a false lien could expose the county to legal action as well. Comments? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| federal, full, liability, lien, paid, recorded, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| federal tax lien bahlg: just found out my dad owes about $65K on federal fax lien. We have no idea what to do or what is going on. My dad doesn't know we have found out... | Taxes | 1 | 04-18-2004 04:13 PM | |
| 60% Of U.S. Corporations Paid No Federal Taxes For 1996-2000 William Brenner: > From CNN Money Many Firms Avoided Taxes in Boom April 6, 2004: 7:32 AM EDT WASHINGTON - More than 60% of U.S. corporations didn't pay any... | Taxes | 1 | 04-08-2004 06:46 PM | |
| Dividends being recorded differently Nova SS: I have a money market account, and I directly own a few shares that pay dividends. When Money 2004 downloads the dividends, it posts the money... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 12-23-2003 04:49 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |