|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: [snip] - quote - > Actually, I'd have to disagree with that. I still think
"Other income" fits the sort of prizes the OP was referring> it's "other income", but I cannot imagine that the > poetry-writing community is so small that one could be > awarded a prize without having a significant body > of work. It might be a "hobby" rather than a > "business" because it's not expected to be profitable, > but it would certainly have to be a regular activity. > However, I think this is still "other income", as > are the Nobel and Field prizes. (The Field prize is > in Mathematics, as there is no Nobel prise in > Mathematics.) to. These aren't payments for services rendered or to be rendered; they're awards in recognition of some sort of eminent achievement. So far as I can tell, they should show up in 1099-MISC box 3 and be reported as "other income" unless there are some unstated facts here. - quote - > As an aside, if the client were EMPLOYED as a
Could. University policies often treat awards won by> poetry writer, wouldn't this argument make the > prize "wage income", rather than SE income? employees as W-2 income. Only way to avoid tax on the prizes altogether, though, is to designate the funds to go to an appropriate institution: you have to do this before receiving the award, and any organization making the sort of awards that are being discussed here will be aware of the procedure that needs to be followed. -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > Jan Zobel EA wrote:
If this is from the employer, sure.> > > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this > > > year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > > > poetry could be so profitable!) > As an aside, if the client were EMPLOYED as a > poetry writer, wouldn't this argument make the > prize "wage income", rather than SE income? B`ut if the Pulitzer prize commitee awards and pays this money to an employee of the New Yorker, then it comes under the category of Prizes & Awards (See Pub 525) and no SE. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > As an aside, if the client were EMPLOYED as a
Even if the prize comes from a third party that is unrelated> poetry writer, wouldn't this argument make the > prize "wage income", rather than SE income? to the employer? I don't think so. (Is a Nobel Prize wage income for a working physicist?) Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > As an aside, if the client were EMPLOYED as a
Actually, it would be an interesting issue from an SE/FICA> poetry writer, wouldn't this argument make the > prize "wage income", rather than SE income? standpoint and would fall between the cracks <grin> --as I recall, the issue has arisen for payments in the auto industry (if I remember right) directly from manufacturers to dealers' employees. The payments aren't self-employment income because they are earned in the trade or business of being an employee. However, since the entity paying the amount doesn't have an employment arrangement with the individual, it's not subject to FICA taxes either. The same analysis would seem to apply here. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| JanZtax wrote: - quote - > Thanks for thinking about this,
I am sure that arguments can be made either way. But, sinceshe appears to be in the "trade or business" of being a poet, I suspect that the IRS would hold these awards to be SE income. Ironically, she might have been better off in this regard to have treated any income along the way as "hobby" related, rather than filing the Schedule Cs. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "MTW" mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > 1) What is her normal line of work and/or primary income source?
She does office work to support herself but she has fileda schedule C the last 5 years or so, showing her occupation as writer/poet. - quote - > 2) Exactly what DID she do to win these awards?
Nothing. Some of her poetry was published in a nationalpoetry magazine and it was seen by the "right" people who nominated her for the awards. This is not a sham thing -- one of the awards is a Guggenheim. - quote - > 3) Has she ever been compensated for writing before?
She has received a couple of other $10,000-20,000 awards in> And does she expect to be compensated in the future? the past and her prior preparer listed them each year as other income. At the same time, each return included a schedule C (as a writer/poet) with less than $100 income and approx $2000 in expenses. Thanks for thinking about this, << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford wrote: - quote - > Jan Zobel EA wrote:
Actually, I'd have to disagree with that. I still think> > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this > > year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > > Thoughts? > Most definitely. Doesn't sound like your client is in a > regular trade or business. it's "other income", but I cannot imagine that the poetry-writing community is so small that one could be awarded a prize without having a significant body of work. It might be a "hobby" rather than a "business" because it's not expected to be profitable, but it would certainly have to be a regular activity. However, I think this is still "other income", as are the Nobel and Field prizes. (The Field prize is in Mathematics, as there is no Nobel prise in Mathematics.) As an aside, if the client were EMPLOYED as a poetry writer, wouldn't this argument make the prize "wage income", rather than SE income? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Jan Zobel EA <janztaxnospam[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this
See the discussion on the bottom of Page 28, Pub 525, Nobel> year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? Prizes .... While ordinarily, prizes would be taxable income (line 21; not SE). under the special conditions referenced above, client might be able to use the money towards creating more poetry while not paying tax on it. __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Jan Zobel EA wrote: - quote - > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this
Most definitely. Doesn't sound like your client is in a> year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? regular trade or business. ChEAr$, Harlan Lunsford << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| janztaxnospam[at]aol.com (Jan Zobel EA) wrote: - quote - > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this
How was this "prize" reported to her, 1099-MISC (Box 7 or> year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? Box 3)? Unless it was considered "Nonemployee compensation", I would treat it as Other Income (line 21) on the 1040. Be sure and include an explanatory statement when filing. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| janztaxnospam[at]aol.com (Jan Zobel EA) wrote: - quote - > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this
How was this "prize" reported to her, 1099-MISC (Box 7 or> year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? Box 3)? Unless it was considered "Nonemployee compensation", I would treat it as Other Income (line 21) on the 1040. Be sure and include an explanatory statement when filing. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Jan Zobel EA wrote: - quote - > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this
As long as she did not perform services to obtain the award> year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? and she is not required to perform services in the future in order to obtain or keep the award, it is not SE income. Use Line 21 Other Income. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Jan Zobel EA wrote: - quote - > So, even though I'm sure the
1) What is her normal line of work and/or primary income source?> IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? 2) Exactly what DID she do to win these awards? - quote - > `3) Has she ever been compensated for writing before? And does she expect to be compensated in the future? MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Jan Zobel EA wrote: - quote - > Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this
Am I missing something here? Aren't awards -- even if> year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing > poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her > estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in > with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, > like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income > belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, > I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. > These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not > have to report on how she spent the money or provide any > services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they > were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably > encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the > IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as > 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. > Thoughts? requested -- considered unearned income? "Other income" seems correct to me. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Met with a client today who won a $100,000 poetry award this year and another $40,000 award (I had no idea that writing poetry could be so profitable!) I was figuring out her estimates for 2004 and at first included the award money in with her other self-employment income. My thinking was that, like book royalties for a self-employed writer, the income belonged on schedule C. But after questionning her further, I learned that she didn't do anything to get these awards. These awards were not for a specific poem and she does not have to report on how she spent the money or provide any services in exchange for the awards. In other words, they were to sort of "reward" her for her writing and presumably encourage her to do more of it. So, even though I'm sure the IRS would look long and hard at a return showing $140,000 as 'other income', I'm thinking maybe that's where it belongs. Thoughts? Jan Zobel EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| award, poetry, subject, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| (no subject) CCrusher: Wachovia Bank recently sent me notice that Money2002 would soon no longer work for account downloads and that I need to update to money 2005. Is... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-10-2005 08:23 AM | |
| Poster of the Week Award: still up for grabs! Dick Watson: The Poster of the Week Award will go to the first person who can clarify the difference between M05 Standard and M05 Deluxe. The "Fact Sheet"... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 09-17-2004 05:40 PM | |
| award trip - 1099-misc or W2? TonyB: My wife (along with everyone in her office) received a vacation for meeting a sales goal for the year. The employer gave her (and everyone else) a... | Taxes | 7 | 02-05-2004 05:07 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |