|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Paul A Thomas <taxman[at]negia.net> wrote: - quote - > "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote
For that size deduction for riding a bicycle, I bet more> > Paul <taxman[at]negia.net> wrote: > > > I would venture to say that the same rules apply to a bike > > > as they do with any other business expenditure. > > $0.33/mile? I wish. > No, ordinary and necessary business use. doctors would make house calls. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin wrote: - quote - > Frederick Jorden wrote:
In Virginia you pay property tax on motor vehicles, with> > But if the way in which the vehicle is used changes it into > > a billboard. We had a local Realtor who had huge signs, for > > her business, plastered all over it and she parked it in a > > strip mall. The sign indicated the van was available for use > > by local charities gratis. The local zoning board ruled it > > was not a motor vehicle but a sign. > I question the zoning board's authority to decide that > it's not a motor vehicle if it's drivable. It seems to > me that if motor vehicle taxes and registration are paid, > it's a motor vehicle, regardless of use. > I've been known to use my car as a storage unit and > as a bedroom. Does that mean I need to pay local > property taxes? some exemption for personal use. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Lord Salt wrote: - quote - > Frederick Jorden <knowtax[at]bigfoot.com> wrote:
But if there is a sport sponsorship arrangement the cost of> > Laz Miskowski wrote: > > > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that > > > advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > > > > > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > > > legal with a bike? > > I know the NASCAR folks take a deduction for the signs on > > the sides of their cars. I guess a race bike is the same > > thing. > Certainly not the whole bicycle. If the bicycle has no > specifically related business purpose without the sign, then > there is no deduction. It's a personal bicycle. > Even if it's a professional racing bicycle, then its > business purpose is rated to the business of professional > bicycle racing, again, having nothing to do with being a > doctor, and it would be deductible from professional bicycle > racing income, not from the doctor's income. the cycle may be deductible depending on the terms of the contract. Alternatively, one could view the cycle as a post on which a sign is mounted. In some cases a post could be deductible. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Frederick Jorden wrote: - quote - > But if the way in which the vehicle is used changes it into
I question the zoning board's authority to decide that> a billboard. We had a local Realtor who had huge signs, for > her business, plastered all over it and she parked it in a > strip mall. The sign indicated the van was available for use > by local charities gratis. The local zoning board ruled it > was not a motor vehicle but a sign. it's not a motor vehicle if it's drivable. It seems to me that if motor vehicle taxes and registration are paid, it's a motor vehicle, regardless of use. I've been known to use my car as a storage unit and as a bedroom. Does that mean I need to pay local property taxes? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote - quote - > Paul <taxman[at]negia.net> wrote:
No, ordinary and necessary business use.> > I would venture to say that the same rules apply to a bike > > as they do with any other business expenditure. > $0.33/mile? I wish. Unless he races the bike, and calls it advertising..........it has to be used in the business. Else I'm gonna stick a CPA sticker on everything I own and deduct it........ -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA Athens, Georgia taxman at negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Frederick Jorden <knowtax[at]bigfoot.com> wrote: - quote - > Laz Miskowski wrote:
Certainly not the whole bicycle. If the bicycle has no> > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that > > advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > > > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > > legal with a bike? > I know the NASCAR folks take a deduction for the signs on > the sides of their cars. I guess a race bike is the same > thing. specifically related business purpose without the sign, then there is no deduction. It's a personal bicycle. Even if it's a professional racing bicycle, then its business purpose is rated to the business of professional bicycle racing, again, having nothing to do with being a doctor, and it would be deductible from professional bicycle racing income, not from the doctor's income. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Paul <taxman[at]negia.net> wrote: - quote - > "Laz Miskowski" <miskowski[at]gmail.com> wrote
$0.33/mile? I wish.> I would venture to say that the same rules apply to a bike > as they do with any other business expenditure. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Why not - if it works for the bike, why wouldn't it work for a car?
Let me apologize if my (partially) flippant answer didn't> Well, based on my search of the archives of this group, it > appears that only the cost of the actual sticker and such > would be deductible. Of course, business vehicles are > deductible in the usual ways, but applying a sticker to your > or my car or a business car appears to give no tax > advantage. Of course, I am no expert. The question is if > this is different for something like a bicycle, where unlike > a car, there are likely no specified > laws/regulations/interpretations. At least that is my vague > understanding. accurately reflect its intent. What my answer meant was this - if there were a legitimate deduction for advertising via a bike, the allowability of the deduction was the result of its legitimacy, and not necessarily to the specificity of the item used. For example, advertising is deductible. This is true whether the advertising is done in the phone book, on TV, the Radio, flyers put on car windshields or whatever. Use of any asset in a trade or business is deductible - its called depreciation. If a construction company has a $100K dump truck, they get to depreciate that truck over its useful life and claim a deduction each year. If its financed, they also get to claim the interest paid. If Lance Armstrong is racing professionally on a $100K bicycle, Lance gets to depreciate that bike over its useful life and claim a depreciation deduction each year. If Lance financed the bike, he also gets to claim the interest paid. On the other hand, if I'm a doctor who thinks dump truck are really cool, I can buy one and I can even put stickers on it advertising my practice. However, this will NOT make the cost of the dump truck deductible, only the cost of the stickers for advertising. If I'm an attorney and I think I ride bicycles just as good as Lance Armstrong I can buy the same bike he rides and I can put stickers on it advertising my practice and I might even ride the bike to work. But again, I'd only get to deduct the cost of advertising, the advertising doesn't allow the deduction of the bike. I have ignored the issues of listed property and business usage limitations for obvious reasons, but you should get the point. The issue is the same for a car as it is for a bike - if the expense qualifies as a legitimate deduction, then you get the deduction, if it doesn't, you don't. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Why not - if it works for the bike, why wouldn't it work for a car?
But if the way in which the vehicle is used changes it into> Well, based on my search of the archives of this group, it > appears that only the cost of the actual sticker and such > would be deductible. Of course, business vehicles are > deductible in the usual ways, but applying a sticker to your > or my car or a business car appears to give no tax > advantage. Of course, I am no expert. The question is if > this is different for something like a bicycle, where unlike > a car, there are likely no specified > laws/regulations/interpretations. At least that is my vague > understanding. a billboard. We had a local Realtor who had huge signs, for her business, plastered all over it and she parked it in a strip mall. The sign indicated the van was available for use by local charities gratis. The local zoning board ruled it was not a motor vehicle but a sign. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| miskowski[at]gmail.com (Laz Miskowski) wrote: - quote - > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that
Unless the doctor can justify the bicycle as ordinary,> advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > legal with a bike? reasonable, and necessary for his business, then, no, it's not deductible. You are correct. Putting an advertising logo on *anything* does not make it a business expense. I find it difficult to see a direct business connection between a doctor and a bicycle. Maybe if the doctor makes house calls, or uses the bicycle to deliver test samples or results .... << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Why not - if it works for the bike, why wouldn't it work for a car?
Well, based on my search of the archives of this group, itappears that only the cost of the actual sticker and such would be deductible. Of course, business vehicles are deductible in the usual ways, but applying a sticker to your or my car or a business car appears to give no tax advantage. Of course, I am no expert. The question is if this is different for something like a bicycle, where unlike a car, there are likely no specified laws/regulations/interpretations. At least that is my vague understanding. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I don't really know, but are we talking about a fairly
I'm guess that this particular bike was fairly expensive,> expensive bike or the garden variety? And what is the > business use of the bike? since it was used on multiple hundreds of miles kind of rally. For argument's sake, let's say it was 2000$. The business use of the bike is soley for advertising the business. The argument would be "every time I am out and about on my bike, at rallies, etc. I am advertising my practice." In my particular case, I am wondering if I can get a bike that advertises my wife's business (she is self-employed) and then deduct the cost of the bike... << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Laz Miskowski" <miskowski[at]gmail.com> wrote - quote - > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that
That he wasn't audited on that issue doesn't mean it's> advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. a valid deduction. - quote - > I know this would not be permissible with a car.
No, it would not be.- quote - > Is this legal with a bike?
I would venture to say that the same rules apply to a bikeas they do with any other business expenditure. Does it pass the Ordinary and Necessary to the business test. My gut instinct says no. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA taxman at negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| miskowski[at]gmail.com (Laz Miskowski) wrote: - quote - > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that
What business purpose is served by the bike? When was the> advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > legal with a bike? last time you saw a doctor making house calls on his bike? Or even in his car? I think that the cost of applying the decals to the bike might be deductible as an advertising expense, but not the cost of the bike itself. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote: [snip] - quote - > Why not - if it works for the bike, why wouldn't it work for a car?
Can't deduct the car, just the cost of the advertising.Placing advertising on a car does not turn nondeductible vehicle expenses into deductible ones, despite many attempts to the contrary. See, for example, http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P07_2820.asp -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote: - quote - > "Laz Miskowski" <miskowski[at]gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]- quote - > > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this
Can't deduct the car, just the cost of the advertising.> > legal with a bike? > Why not - if it works for the bike, why wouldn't it work for a car? Placing advertising on a car does not turn nondeductible vehicle expenses into deductible ones, despite many attempts to the contrary. See, for example, http://www.toolkit.cch.com/text/P07_2820.asp -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Laz Miskowski wrote: - quote - > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that
I know the NASCAR folks take a deduction for the signs on> advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > legal with a bike? the sides of their cars. I guess a race bike is the same thing. -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Laz Miskowski" <miskowski[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that
Why not - if it works for the bike, why wouldn't it work for a car?> advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > legal with a bike? Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that
I don't really know, but are we talking about a fairly> advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. > I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this > legal with a bike? expensive bike or the garden variety? And what is the business use of the bike? Helen, EA in PA 50 miles, 3 days, 1 cause - Multiple Sclerosis Challenge Walk for the Cure October 1 to October 3, 2004 Donate on-line at www.msandyou.org << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I know of a doctor that has a bicycle with logos on it that advertises his practice. He deducted the bike. I know this would not be permissible with a car. Is this legal with a bike? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |