|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dick Adams wrote: - quote - > account[at]cygen.com (Brett) wrote:
It seems so. I searched to find the TLAs.> > If one certifies as a CFM, is it worth the effort to also > > become a CMA since it is only one more part of the four part > > exam and vice versa? In other words, why aren't there more > > CFM/CMAs or CMA/CFMs than only CFM or CMA (seems CMA is more > > popular at least)? > Does CFM mean Certified Financial Manager? If yes, go for > Certified Management Accountant. http://www.financial-designations.8m.com/ lists them, for those who might want to translate. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| marko.online[at]gmail.com (jake johnson) wrote: - quote - > account[at]cygen.com (Brett) wrote:
The CFM exam is daunting in the way of all the fees they> > If one certifies as a CFM, is it worth the effort to also > > become a CMA since it is only one more part of the four part > > exam and vice versa? In other words, why aren't there more > > CFM/CMAs or CMA/CFMs than only CFM or CMA (seems CMA is more > > popular at least)? > That's an interesting question because there really doesn't > seem to be a big push to get both titles even when a 2nd > title would be just one more exam away (but I wonder about > fees?). I don't even think the IMA website mentions what > the CPE requirements would be for a dual certificant. I'm a > new member of the IMA and am planning on taking the CMA > exams myself but don't really see the point in tacking on > what would be a mostly redundant title. I get the feeling > that the IMA's intent was to broaden their audience to > non-accountant financial managers and that a CMA holder > tacking on the CFM would be a bit disingenuous. > Before you make up your mind on this, you should become an > IMA member and review their materials. The IMA gets lost in > the shuffle of tax and audit practitioners, but they're a > high-caliber group that does great work. require. I called today to very fees. It's $115 per part (four parts). Before you can take the exam, you must pay a $75 enrollment, $15 registration, and $75 for something else for a total of $265. $265 + $460 (4 X $115) = $725. That doesn't include studay materials. I'd pay that but the person on the phone was starting to get rude after I asked for more clarification on the new exams. IMA is starting a new CMA exam format. Those that pay before July 31 get parts 1, 2, and 3 for $150. I asked the lady about CFM exam discounts. She said there were none and didn't know if there ever would be. Then she said I had to shell out the $265 by June 30th to keep the current CMA format, which allows you to take only part 2 of the CFM exam to earn that designation. She said something about an essay format for part 4 on the new exams. To many things going on at IMA for me. I have no idea what type of people are being employed by IMA. They don't know much and aren't helpful. Because of this impression, I'm no longer pursueing the CFM. Yeah, that quick. I had many questions and there weren't many people (CPAs) that could answer them. Most people want to be a CPA for obvious reasons. CMA seems as an unpopular light version of the CPA. CFM isn't even known. When I turned to the source, the answers still weren't there. This doesn't change my direction but does answer other important questions for me. Brett << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| account[at]cygen.com (Brett) wrote: - quote - > If one certifies as a CFM, is it worth the effort to also
Does CFM mean Certified Financial Manager? If yes, go for> become a CMA since it is only one more part of the four part > exam and vice versa? In other words, why aren't there more > CFM/CMAs or CMA/CFMs than only CFM or CMA (seems CMA is more > popular at least)? Certified Management Accountant. My best advice to you is to look into industry specific certifications. So while you're at it, look into APICS (American Production and Inventory Control Society). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| account[at]cygen.com (Brett) wrote: - quote - > If one certifies as a CFM, is it worth the effort to also
That's an interesting question because there really doesn't> become a CMA since it is only one more part of the four part > exam and vice versa? In other words, why aren't there more > CFM/CMAs or CMA/CFMs than only CFM or CMA (seems CMA is more > popular at least)? seem to be a big push to get both titles even when a 2nd title would be just one more exam away (but I wonder about fees?). I don't even think the IMA website mentions what the CPE requirements would be for a dual certificant. I'm a new member of the IMA and am planning on taking the CMA exams myself but don't really see the point in tacking on what would be a mostly redundant title. I get the feeling that the IMA's intent was to broaden their audience to non-accountant financial managers and that a CMA holder tacking on the CFM would be a bit disingenuous. Before you make up your mind on this, you should become an IMA member and review their materials. The IMA gets lost in the shuffle of tax and audit practitioners, but they're a high-caliber group that does great work. - Jake << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| If one certifies as a CFM, is it worth the effort to also become a CMA since it is only one more part of the four part exam and vice versa? In other words, why aren't there more CFM/CMAs or CMA/CFMs than only CFM or CMA (seems CMA is more popular at least)? Thanks, Brett << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |