|
#5
| |||
| |||
| joeu2004[at]hotmail.com (Joe User) wrote: - quote - > It seems quite obvious that Calif Form DE-4 is wrong.
snip> So obviously wrong for so long that I doubt my own > conclusion. > So I want to vet it here before reporting the mistake > to the FTB. Am I making a mistake? Sorry it has taken me so long to get to this. I agree with you. The form is wrong, or at least misleading. The purpose of the DE-4 is to tell the employer (1) your marital status; (2) the number of withholding exemptions you wish to claim; and (3) the amount you wish to have withheld IN ADDITION TO the amount that would be withheld based on items (1) and (2), if any. The "OR" makes no sense in this context. The federal W-4 has a little different format but it clearly asks for BOTH the number of exemptions (line 1) AND the additional amount, if any, to be withheld (line 2). My guess is that most employers take the "OR" for "AND" and have never thought about it. They have to have all those pieces of information to set up your withholding. Even if you chose "single" and "zero" (which logically you would, to get the maximum amount withheld and perhaps avoid the additional amount altogether), they need to know that. So I wouldn't worry too much about the employer being confused. I might just cross out the "OR" which is unnecessary anyway. Or white it out <G> . I think you already figured out that any correspondence about this form should be directed to the Employment Development Department (EDD), not FTB. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "A.G. Kalman" <glendale202-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > > Joe User wrote:
skip- quote - > > (I added the line numbers "a", "b", and "c" for clarity.)
To which A.G. responded:- quote - > I don't know what version of the DE-4 you are looking at.
I hope I'm not reading too much into this, but whether "is"> My version is quite clear and does not contain any "1. a, b > or c." > I advise you to download the most current version. means "is" or, and/or, whether it's its or it's it's (it's not its unless it's not it's) or not, it's and. I vote for User. --Harry B., tax pedant and picker of nits. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dave Woods <davidwoods[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > Is this really all that important to you? If it is,
As I explained: "I want to vet it here before reporting> might I inquire as to why you haven't contacted the FTB? the mistake to the FTB. Am I making a mistake?" Klunk! Oh well, it has been 4 days, and not a single constructive comment. I hope that means that my observation is not "obviously" wrong. So yes, I will follow through with the EDD (not the FTB, as I wrote previously). As for the importance .... Actually, it is not important to me as an individual. My company has its own electronic equivalent of the DE-4 content, and they did interpret the "OR" as "AND", in effect. However, this became an issue when I was advising my wife on how to fill in the DE-4 for her job. I was worried that the office manager might misinterpret the form, which would result in an incorrect amount being withheld. Of course, we could deal with that on an individual basis, since the office is so small. I'm sure there would be no problem convincing the office manager to do the "right" thing for us. But I expected the professionals in this forum to look at the bigger picture and foresee the potential for "misinterpretation" of DE-4 by many others. Therefore, I expected some of you to rally behind the need to correct the form -- if, indeed, my observation was correct. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "A.G. Kalman" <glendale202-mtm[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I don't know what version of the DE-4 you are looking at.
Which is why I wrote originally: "__I__ added the line> My version is quite clear and does not contain any "1. a, b > or c." numbers "a", "b", and "c" for clarity". Klunk! I do not believe the addition of subsection numbers affects the interpretation of the form vis-a-vis my question, namely the interpretation of "OR" in the form. If you feel differently, I would be interested in how your interpretation of the "OR" differs from any of the alternatives that I offered. However, "I advise you" to reread my originally posting carefully first. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Joe User wrote: - quote - > It seems quite obvious that Calif Form DE-4 is wrong.
I don't know what version of the DE-4 you are looking at.> So obviously wrong for so long that I doubt my own > conclusion. > So I want to vet it here before reporting the mistake > to the FTB. Am I making a mistake? > Calif Form DE-4 has the following structure: > ----- BEGIN FORM EXCERPT > 1a. Number of Regular Withholding Allowances, > Worksheet A ___ > b. Number of Additional Withholding Allowances, > Worksheet B ___ > c. Total Number of Allowances ___ > OR > 2. Additional [dollar] amount, Worksheet C ___ > ----- END FORM EXCERPT > (I added the line numbers "a", "b", and "c" for clarity.) > At issue is the word "OR". I think it should be "AND". > The natural interpretation is "line 1 OR line 2". But if > that were correct, what would line 2 be "additional" to? > Moreover, in computing line 2, Worksheet C line 13 takes > line 1c into account. The instructions are to account > for "the amount that will be withheld [from] your wages > based on the [filing] status and number of withholding > allowances you will claim". > So I conclude that the intent of the form is "line 1 AND > line 2". > When I file Form DE-4, I would cross out "OR" and write > "AND" in order to ensure that the employer understands > my intent. My version is quite clear and does not contain any "1. a, b or c." 1. Number of allowances for Regular Withholding Allowances, Worksheet A __________________ Number of allowances from the Estimated Deductions, Worksheet B _____________ Total Number of Allowances (A + B) ________________________ OR 2. Additional amount of state income to be withheld each pay period (if employer agrees), Worksheet C __________________ I advise you to download the most current version. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Joe User" <joeu2004[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > It seems quite obvious that Calif Form DE-4 is wrong.
I guess this all depends on what the definition of the word> So obviously wrong for so long that I doubt my own > conclusion. > So I want to vet it here before reporting the mistake > to the FTB. Am I making a mistake? > Calif Form DE-4 has the following structure: > ----- BEGIN FORM EXCERPT > 1a. Number of Regular Withholding Allowances, > Worksheet A ___ > b. Number of Additional Withholding Allowances, > Worksheet B ___ > c. Total Number of Allowances ___ > OR > 2. Additional [dollar] amount, Worksheet C ___ > ----- END FORM EXCERPT > (I added the line numbers "a", "b", and "c" for clarity.) > At issue is the word "OR". I think it should be "AND". > The natural interpretation is "line 1 OR line 2". But if > that were correct, what would line 2 be "additional" to? > Moreover, in computing line 2, Worksheet C line 13 takes > line 1c into account. The instructions are to account > for "the amount that will be withheld [from] your wages > based on the [filing] status and number of withholding > allowances you will claim". > So I conclude that the intent of the form is "line 1 AND > line 2". > When I file Form DE-4, I would cross out "OR" and write > "AND" in order to ensure that the employer understands > my intent. "is" is. Is this really all that important to you? If it is, might I inquire as to why you haven't contacted the FTB? -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Boston, MA 02109 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| It seems quite obvious that Calif Form DE-4 is wrong. So obviously wrong for so long that I doubt my own conclusion. So I want to vet it here before reporting the mistake to the FTB. Am I making a mistake? Calif Form DE-4 has the following structure: ----- BEGIN FORM EXCERPT 1a. Number of Regular Withholding Allowances, Worksheet A ___ b. Number of Additional Withholding Allowances, Worksheet B ___ c. Total Number of Allowances ___ OR 2. Additional [dollar] amount, Worksheet C ___ ----- END FORM EXCERPT (I added the line numbers "a", "b", and "c" for clarity.) At issue is the word "OR". I think it should be "AND". The natural interpretation is "line 1 OR line 2". But if that were correct, what would line 2 be "additional" to? Moreover, in computing line 2, Worksheet C line 13 takes line 1c into account. The instructions are to account for "the amount that will be withheld [from] your wages based on the [filing] status and number of withholding allowances you will claim". So I conclude that the intent of the form is "line 1 AND line 2". When I file Form DE-4, I would cross out "OR" and write "AND" in order to ensure that the employer understands my intent. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| calif, confirm, de4, form, wrong |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Option to Confirm Payee Digital Boy: In M08, where is the option to "confirm payee" before adding it to the list of payees? Thank you! | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-19-2008 04:21 PM | |
| Money 2007 - Does NOT confirm New Payees None@here.com: I have had this issue for the last several versions of Money that the program automatically (without confirmation) adds every Payee that it... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-19-2008 02:59 AM | |
| Please confirm understanding of depreciation recapture for home business Robert: Assuming my wife and I meet the ownership and use tests, and assuming we have depreciated a portion of our home for a home-based business, can the... | Taxes | 5 | 05-29-2004 01:53 PM | |
| Calif. LLC; domestic or foreign The Rainmaker: My partner and I have settled on an LLC (vs. S Corp.) to buy and sell income property in several states, including California. We both live in... | Taxes | 3 | 04-27-2004 06:11 PM | |
| Estate Issue in Calif. bobby: I inherited my grandmother's estate (the only thing left in her estate is her house) as she passed away a few weeks ago. She has a living trust. ... | Taxes | 6 | 02-04-2004 03:13 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |