|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I'd just like to confirm the following and make sure that my
You're correct only if you meet one of the conditions that> understanding is correct. > I have a primary residence that I've lived in for 1 year. > I plan to see my home in the very near future. > Based on the below information from IRS web site, it seems > that I can get a "pro-rated" exclusion on the sale of my > home, even though I've lived in it for less than 2 years. qualify you for the reduced exclusion. It's not automatic. See IRS Publication 523. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| lhjunk[at]yahoo.com (Lee) wrote: - quote - > I'd just like to confirm the following and make sure that my
To use the prorated exclusion, the sale of the home must be> understanding is correct. > I have a primary residence that I've lived in for 1 year. > I plan to see my home in the very near future. > Based on the below information from IRS web site, it seems > that I can get a "pro-rated" exclusion on the sale of my > home, even though I've lived in it for less than 2 years. due to: 1. Job relocation 2. Health reasons 3. Unforseen circumstances (including, among other things, death in the family, unemployment, divorce, multiple births from the same pregnancy) The IRS has issued regulations discussing in more detail how each of the above is interpreted. The regs are at 26 CFR 1.121-3T. I also seem to remember a recent PLR or Tax Court case approving the use of the reduced exclusion where a household member was released from prison but was unable to live in the home due because it was too close to a school and the terms of his supervised release required him to stay away from schools. -- Greg Broiles, J.D., E.A. gbroiles[at]spamcop.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > <For qualifying sellers, the maximum exclusion amount of $250,000
The key here is "qualifying seller" Lee. Unless you qualify> ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) is limited to the > percentage of the two years that the person fulfilled the > requirements. to prorate the exclusion, you cannot do so. Take a look at what the requirements are. Will << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have a primary residence that I've lived in for 1 year.
Why are you selling? We need to know so that we can give> I plan to see my home in the very near future. you a proper answer. Helen, EA in PA Member of The Tax Gang Director, National Assoication of Enrolled Agents Immediate Past President, PA Society of Enrolled Agents << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Lee wrote: - quote - > I'd just like to confirm the following and make sure that my
You have to first qualify to meet one of the exceptions to> understanding is correct. be able to prorate the exclusion. The general rule is that you cannot claim any exemption if you haven't both owned the property and used it as your principal residence for two years out of the five years preceding the date of sale. That is what is a meant by a "qualifying seller" in the paragraph you have quoted, which is an attempt to explain IRC Section 121. The key question is going to be *why* you are selling the home (change of employment, health reasons, divorce, etc.). Some reasons qualify to get relief, while others don't. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| lhjunk[at]yahoo.com (Lee) writes: - quote - > I'd just like to confirm the following and make sure that my
No, that's not correct. Unless you're selling for> understanding is correct. > I have a primary residence that I've lived in for 1 year. > I plan to see my home in the very near future. > Based on the below information from IRS web site, it seems > that I can get a "pro-rated" exclusion on the sale of my > home, even though I've lived in it for less than 2 years. an "approved" reason, pro-ration is not allowed and you have to pay tax on the entire gain. "Just because" is not a good enough reason. So, why are you selling? -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I'd just like to confirm the following and make sure that my
circumstances" stated right above that?> understanding is correct. > I have a primary residence that I've lived in for 1 year. > I plan to see my home in the very near future. > Based on the below information from IRS web site, it seems > that I can get a "pro-rated" exclusion on the sale of my > home, even though I've lived in it for less than 2 years. > For example, let's say that the "Gain" on my home (a condo) > is $150,000 and I am Married. If I sell the home after 1 > year, then my $150,000 gain should be tax free. > From: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...105042,00.html > ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) is limited to the > percentage of the two years that the person fulfilled the > requirements. Thus, a qualifying seller who owns and occupies a home > for one year (half of two years) – and who has not excluded gain on > another home in that time – may exclude half the regular maximum > amount, or up to $125,000 of gain ($250,000 for most joint returns). > The proportion may be figured in days or months.> Doesn't what you quoted apply to the "unforeseen I posed a similar question here in like Feb 04 where a guy sold his place in 22 months. He had no unforeseen circumstances excuse. Was told in this group he was SOL. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'd just like to confirm the following and make sure that my understanding is correct. I have a primary residence that I've lived in for 1 year. I plan to see my home in the very near future. Based on the below information from IRS web site, it seems that I can get a "pro-rated" exclusion on the sale of my home, even though I've lived in it for less than 2 years. For example, let's say that the "Gain" on my home (a condo) is $150,000 and I am Married. If I sell the home after 1 year, then my $150,000 gain should be tax free. From: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/...105042,00.html <<For qualifying sellers, the maximum exclusion amount of $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) is limited to the percentage of the two years that the person fulfilled the requirements. Thus, a qualifying seller who owns and occupies a home for one year (half of two years) – and who has not excluded gain on another home in that time – may exclude half the regular maximum amount, or up to $125,000 of gain ($250,000 for most joint returns). The proportion may be figured in days or months.> Thanks for your feedback on whether my understanding is correct. Regards, Lee << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| exclusion, home, prorated, sale, tax, years |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| House sale when home office was claimed in prior years NewBus5798: Hi Folks- Posted this a week or so ago but haven't gotten any responses. Can anyone help? I sold my house in 2003 and have been claiming a home... | Taxes | 3 | 02-10-2004 07:46 PM | |
| Home gain sale-prorated exclusion Mike Lewis: A couple of years ago (or longer), I expressed a position that the "unforeseen circumstances" clause of the rules permitting partial exclusion of... | Taxes | 3 | 12-15-2003 01:44 PM | |
| Military Home Sale Cap Gain exclusion Bryan: Hello, Can anyone lay out the new timeline for the capital gains exclusion on home sales for members of the military? The Military Family Tax... | Taxes | 1 | 12-12-2003 04:06 AM | |
| Home gain sale-prorated exclusion Mike Lewis: A couple of years ago (or longer), I expressed a position that the "unforeseen circumstances" clause of the rules permitting partial exclusion of... | Taxes | 4 | 12-09-2003 09:05 AM | |
| Capital gains on home sale - less than 2 years Ron: Tax question really if you have any advice or can point me in the right direction (besides hiring a tax attorney). We are selling our home for... | Taxes | 11 | 09-23-2003 04:02 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |