|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > My current software provider is getting really expensive.
I use Lacerte pay per return and have been very happy with it.> Can anyone suggest a reasonable software provider for a > small (150-200 returns) practice? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Frank S. Duke, Jr. <dukefs[at]one.net> wrote: - quote - > Gee you must use Pro-Series too! I do pay per return and it
Out of curiosity, how does it handle split year cities? TP> cost a bunch but I love the software. Compatibility with > TurboTax is important for the basket case people who bring > in their effort at completing the return. I also use > TurboTax for kids and "what ifs". I like the Ohio local > municipality returns, particularly Cincinnati and the Ohio > MFS software. I am a big fan of forms based software. lives 5 months in Cincinnati and 7 months in Columbus and has rental property for 8 months in Dayton? __ Art Kamlet ArtKamlet [at] AOL.com Columbus OH K2PZH << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| CBotella <cbotella[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > My only complaint so far has been that you cannot do
Actually, they DO support PY/NR returns in SOME states. But,> Nonresident or partial year resident returns for the > states. I agree, their coverage is NOT complete across the board. Similarly, it appears that they don't support "ES" vouchers (or equivalent) in all states. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| llts2 <llts2[at]earthlink.net> wrote: - quote - > My current software provider is getting really expensive.
Gee you must use Pro-Series too! I do pay per return and itcost a bunch but I love the software. Compatibility with TurboTax is important for the basket case people who bring in their effort at completing the return. I also use TurboTax for kids and "what ifs". I like the Ohio local municipality returns, particularly Cincinnati and the Ohio MFS software. I am a big fan of forms based software. - quote - > Can anyone suggest a reasonable software provider for a
All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your> small (150-200 returns) practice? Many thanks money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > My current software provider is getting really expensive.
I started using TaxAct this year. Quite satisfied.> Can anyone suggest a reasonable software provider for a > small (150-200 returns) practice? Preparer's edition $99 (that's not a typo!). All States was an additional $51.80. ] My only complaint so far has been that you cannot do Nonresident or partial year resident returns for the states. Hopefully, TaxAct will correct this for 2004 filings. Kate Botella, EA in PA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "llts2" <llts2[at]earthlink.net> wrote: - quote - > My current software provider is getting really expensive.
TaxSlayerPro, ATX and Drake are not too expensive.> Can anyone suggest a reasonable software provider for a > small (150-200 returns) practice? Many thanks << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My current software provider is getting really expensive. Can anyone suggest a reasonable software provider for a small (150-200 returns) practice? Many thanks << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| preparers, question |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Survey for Tax Preparers Michael Cooper: If you are wandering around this group on the 14th, you're my kinda tax preparer. Taking a quick survey as it regards to pending bill in... | Taxes | 11 | 04-19-2004 06:48 PM | |
| NY preparers ques...... Nan Eklund: I've been ok'd for efiling IRS and CA for years. However, one client has a NR NY state rental. Have to efile Fed and CA. Checking the NY home... | Taxes | 7 | 01-28-2004 10:15 PM | |
| Question for NYS preparers Wcm7315: This year, Line 56 on IT 201, is new. It is the "sales and use tax" line, which requests payment of sales tax on purchases bought out of state... | Taxes | 5 | 01-21-2004 01:08 PM | |
| Should Tax Preparers be Licenced? Will Eckenstein: I'm a college student doing resarch on tax preparers for one of my final esays. My thesis statement is: "Tax preparers should be certified or... | Taxes | 55 | 01-07-2004 02:55 AM | |
| Should Tax preparers be licenced by the Gov.? Will Eckenstein: I'm a college student grathering reserch for my final paper. My working thesis is "Individual tax preparers should be certified in some way in... | Taxes | 6 | 12-17-2003 09:43 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |