|
#18
| |||
| |||
| Dave Woods <davidwoods[at]verizon.net> wrote: - quote - > Demographics. Many people who qualify based on income
A traditional IRA offers a rare double tax benefit. For> either are ineligible (students and dependents) or have > other preceding credits and deductions that wipe out their > tax. Case in point, try hard to come up with a scenario > where a person can maximize the credit. Almost impossible > to do at the lowest income level. example, someone with an AGI of $16,000 could put $1,000 into a traditional IRA, reducing his AGI to $15,000. In addition to this reduction of taxable income, he also gets a credit for $500, which is 50% of his contribution. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Dave Woods wrote: - quote - > Case in point, try hard to come up with a scenario
The problem, as I recall, is that this credit was originally> where a person can maximize the credit. Almost impossible > to do at the lowest income level. You almost need a Roth or > non-deductible IRA contribution because otherwise the > deduction of the contribution lowers taxable income to a > level where you don't wipe out the all the tax before > maximizing the credit. designed around a 15% tax rate. Then, Congress added the 10% bracket and it screwed the whole thing up (not enough tax for the credit to offset, as you note). I believe there is only one filing status (HOH, I think) where you can still get the FULL amount of the credit with the proper scenario. I'd have to check, but I believe all the situations where I've been able to use the credit DO involve Roths or non-deductible contributions. I recall one where the ~optimum~ deal resulted in deducting about $800 of the IRA and NONdeducting the other $1,200. Weird! MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| "Harlan Lunsford" <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > Dave Woods wrote:
Harlan, all kidding aside, its not a matter necessarily of> > "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote: > > > So, my question is this, how does one expect to retain > > > clients and grow a practice if they don't take the time to > > > check for things like this? After, isn't this exactly what > > > we, as professionals are supposed to be getting paid for, to > > > make sure things like this don't get overlooked? > > As I previously stated, few clients qualify for much if any > > of the credit, and presumably any competent preparer is > > using tax software that will automatically pick it up. > Your reply is most interesting, Dave, since many of us have > indicated to the contrary. I reckon we all have clients who > do not have the high incomes as up in "Tax"achussetts! > (grin. income. While its true I have few clients who even qualify from that standpoint, if you run a calculation, it is VERY difficult to get the credit. Why? Demographics. Many people who qualify based on income either are ineligible (students and dependents) or have other preceding credits and deductions that wipe out their tax. Case in point, try hard to come up with a scenario where a person can maximize the credit. Almost impossible to do at the lowest income level. You almost need a Roth or non-deductible IRA contribution because otherwise the deduction of the contribution lowers taxable income to a level where you don't wipe out the all the tax before maximizing the credit. One you start getting into dependents, you have the dependent care credit, child tax credit, exemptions, head of household, etc. By the time you get through all that (assuming its a single person as a married couple isn't likely to be making such small dollars) there isn't much if any tax left. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Boston, MA 02109 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Dave Woods wrote: - quote - > "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote:
Your reply is most interesting, Dave, since many of us have> > So, my question is this, how does one expect to retain > > clients and grow a practice if they don't take the time to > > check for things like this? After, isn't this exactly what > > we, as professionals are supposed to be getting paid for, to > > make sure things like this don't get overlooked? > As I previously stated, few clients qualify for much if any > of the credit, and presumably any competent preparer is > using tax software that will automatically pick it up. indicated to the contrary. I reckon we all have clients who do not have the high incomes as up in "Tax"achussetts! (grin. But that's okay. More power to ya'! Cheer$, from your poor EA cousin, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote: - quote - > So, my question is this, how does one expect to retain
As I previously stated, few clients qualify for much if any> clients and grow a practice if they don't take the time to > check for things like this? After, isn't this exactly what > we, as professionals are supposed to be getting paid for, to > make sure things like this don't get overlooked? of the credit, and presumably any competent preparer is using tax software that will automatically pick it up. -- David M. Woods, EA, ChFC, CLU Woods Financial Services Boston, MA 02109 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > For an initial return, yes, but the last time I looked at
The tax programs that I've used in recent history (TaxACT> various packages, flagging things for AMENDED returns often > didn't happen.... It seems as if it was "over-expected" > that the return was done correctly the first time. and AmTax) pushed to Column "C" on Form 1040X (not Column "A"). So, you ALWAYS get the full diagnostics, etc. Back in the last century, I used TurboTax (or whatever it was called). At that time, at least, their "X" pushed to Column "A". I remember having a big argument with one of their high level people over that, and shortly thereafter I dumped 'em. <g MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote: - quote - > Gene E. Utterback, EA wrote:
For an individual preparing their own return it should be a> > "Herb Smith" <smithff33[at]aol.com> wrote: > > > Han <noone[at]nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then > > > > decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > > > > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > > > > tax return as presently filed. > > > > > > > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > > > > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > > > > any)? > > > Roth IRA contributions are made with AFTER TAX funds, > > > therefore there is no need to report the contribution > > > ANYWHERE on your return. Your account custodian will make > > > the notification to the IRS, per form 5498. Don't hold your > > > breath waiting for an IRS inquiry :-) > > This answer is not entirely correct - Roth contributions are > > made with after tax dollars and they are not deductible. > > However, depending on your circumstances a Roth contribution > > may generate a retirement credit. I would suggest you > > recalculate your return to see if the Roth contribution > > created or increased the retirement credit then decide > > whether you need to amend or not. > In practicality, so few people qualify for that credit, is > it even worth the time to check? simple matter to reopen the tax return software and plug in the contribution to see what happens, then compare the results with the return they filed. For a self prepared return there would be no cost for this at all and it would give the taxpayer an idea of how much money they left on the table. For professionally prepared return, it would depend on what level of service was offered to the clients. I do my very best to do my very best for every client I prepare a return for. The ones that don't make much money are entitled to the same zealous efforts from me as the ones whose AGIs exceed $600K. Besides, the clients who qualify for a credit associated with a Roth contribution are the clients that I expect to grow into substantial clients in the years to come. They have the discipline to save even when their incomes are low. And make no mistake, discipline is the primary factor necessary when it comes to savings, not cash flow! Since I believe that my clients have paid me to do the best job I can, I feel morally and legally obligated to check for this credit when I prepare the return. Had I done the original return and missed the credit, assuming I had sufficient information to have calculated it, I would prepare the amended return for free no matter how small the additional refund would be. Of course, if I am fixing someone else's work - be it another professional or a PBC return, the of course I'd advise the client that my fee could very well exceed the refund and let them make the decision. I'd guess that about 3% of the returns I do qualify for this credit when a Roth is involved. The vast majority of those are recent college grads on their first jobs who can't participate in company sponsored plans who are still relying on their parents for a bit of financial assistance but who are NOT dependents of their parents - and in more than half the cases either the parents are the ones giving the kid the money to fund the Roth or the kids are using their refunds to fund the Roths. So my average client for this is a young, educated, disciplined person - likely the kind of person who will not only succeed in life, but whom I expect to excel. So, my question is this, how does one expect to retain clients and grow a practice if they don't take the time to check for things like this? After, isn't this exactly what we, as professionals are supposed to be getting paid for, to make sure things like this don't get overlooked? Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| MTW wrote: - quote - > D. Stussy wrote:
For an initial return, yes, but the last time I looked at> > In practicality, so few people qualify for that credit, is > > it even worth the time to check? > Decent software should flag this automatically. About 5% of > my clients qualify. various packages, flagging things for AMENDED returns often didn't happen.... It seems as if it was "over-expected" that the return was done correctly the first time. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > Gene E. Utterback, EA wrote:
It depends on what part of the country you're in, as to the> > "Herb Smith" <smithff33[at]aol.com> wrote: > > > Han <noone[at]nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then > > > > decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > > > > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > > > > tax return as presently filed. > > > > > > > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > > > > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > > > > any)? > > > Roth IRA contributions are made with AFTER TAX funds, > > > therefore there is no need to report the contribution > > > ANYWHERE on your return. Your account custodian will make > > > the notification to the IRS, per form 5498. Don't hold your > > > breath waiting for an IRS inquiry :-) > > This answer is not entirely correct - Roth contributions are > > made with after tax dollars and they are not deductible. > > However, depending on your circumstances a Roth contribution > > may generate a retirement credit. I would suggest you > > recalculate your return to see if the Roth contribution > > created or increased the retirement credit then decide > > whether you need to amend or not. > In practicality, so few people qualify for that credit, is > it even worth the time to check? probability that people can qualify for the credit. In these parts, where in general incomes are lower, I find quite a few do qualify and are quite pleased at the extra credit. Also I take the time given the right circumstances (income, other factors, etc) to see if a client might actually benefit from making a contribution before 4/15. Another way to benefit your clients. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > In practicality, so few people qualify for that credit, is
Decent software should flag this automatically. About 5% of> it even worth the time to check? my clients qualify. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Gene E. Utterback, EA" <eagent[at]alliancetax.com> wrote in - quote - > This answer is not entirely correct - Roth contributions are
Thanks Gene!> made with after tax dollars and they are not deductible. > However, depending on your circumstances a Roth contribution > may generate a retirement credit. I would suggest you > recalculate your return to see if the Roth contribution > created or increased the retirement credit then decide > whether you need to amend or not. -- Best regards Han email address is invalid << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Gene E. Utterback, EA wrote: - quote - > "Herb Smith" <smithff33[at]aol.com> wrote:
In practicality, so few people qualify for that credit, is> > Han <noone[at]nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then > > > decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > > > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > > > tax return as presently filed. > > > > > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > > > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > > > any)? > > Roth IRA contributions are made with AFTER TAX funds, > > therefore there is no need to report the contribution > > ANYWHERE on your return. Your account custodian will make > > the notification to the IRS, per form 5498. Don't hold your > > breath waiting for an IRS inquiry :-) > This answer is not entirely correct - Roth contributions are > made with after tax dollars and they are not deductible. > However, depending on your circumstances a Roth contribution > may generate a retirement credit. I would suggest you > recalculate your return to see if the Roth contribution > created or increased the retirement credit then decide > whether you need to amend or not. it even worth the time to check? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Herb Smith" <smithff33[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Han <noone[at]nospam.invalid> wrote:
This answer is not entirely correct - Roth contributions are> > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then > > decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > > tax return as presently filed. > > > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > > any)? > Roth IRA contributions are made with AFTER TAX funds, > therefore there is no need to report the contribution > ANYWHERE on your return. Your account custodian will make > the notification to the IRS, per form 5498. Don't hold your > breath waiting for an IRS inquiry :-) made with after tax dollars and they are not deductible. However, depending on your circumstances a Roth contribution may generate a retirement credit. I would suggest you recalculate your return to see if the Roth contribution created or increased the retirement credit then decide whether you need to amend or not. Gene E. Utterback, EA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Harlan, and Dave. I was in plenty of time (days), and that was good, because for some reason Fidelity didn't accept an electronic transaction for my spouse (who is as electronic as they come, especially with genealogy). The mailed check was even in time ... -- Best regards Han email address is invalid << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Han <noone[at]nospam.invalid> wrote: - quote - > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then
Roth IRA contributions are made with AFTER TAX funds,> decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > tax return as presently filed. > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > any)? therefore there is no need to report the contribution ANYWHERE on your return. Your account custodian will make the notification to the IRS, per form 5498. Don't hold your breath waiting for an IRS inquiry :-) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then
Roth contributions are reported if the taxpayer uses them to> > decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > > tax return as presently filed. > > > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > > any)? > The only reason most tax software asks you about your Roth > contributions is to see if you were eligible. If you were > (met the income limits), there is no reporting. claim the saver's credit. But I don't think the IRS will come after you for failing to claim the saver's credit. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Han wrote: - quote - > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then
Nope. It's not a tax return item. Just so you actually> decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > tax return as presently filed. > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > any)? set the account up and made the contribution (and have evidence) before 11:59 p.m. April 15th. (I like to leave a minute just in case!) Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then
Thanks, Frank!> > decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > > tax return as presently filed. > > > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > > any)? > The only reason most tax software asks you about your Roth > contributions is to see if you were eligible. If you were > (met the income limits), there is no reporting. -- Best regards Han email address is invalid << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then
The only reason most tax software asks you about your Roth> decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr > 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my > tax return as presently filed. > DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made > contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if > any)? contributions is to see if you were eligible. If you were (met the income limits), there is no reporting. All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I filed my 2003 taxes before April 15, 2004, but then decided to make Roth IRA contributions for 2003 (before Apr 15 as well). I didn't mention Roth IRA contributions in my tax return as presently filed. DO I need to amend the return (joint, both filers made contributions), or should I wait for an IRS inquiry (if any)? -- Best regards Han email address is invalid << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| amended, contribution, return, roth |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Do I need to file an amended return? Natasha Hillman: sabex <rableach@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in snip! > When I run those numbers through TaxCut (which sucks, by the > way) I used it last year,... | Taxes | 5 | 04-15-2004 07:14 AM | |
| Amended Tax Return Jim Foyle: My broker at the last minute sent me corrected 1099-DIVs and 1099-INTs. The corrections are to my advantage, and increase my refund. The problem... | Taxes | 7 | 04-08-2004 06:26 PM | |
| Amended return once, can I do it again? Vigo: I filed my tax return as soon as I received all of my 1099s - I wanted to get it filed early because I needed to fill out the FAFSA as soon as... | Taxes | 10 | 03-05-2004 06:37 PM | |
| Roth IRA contribution limits ezeppelin@msn.com: My income is highly variable. This year my AGI will be somewhere between $60k and $140k. I'd like to go ahead and get started contributing to a... | Taxes | 2 | 03-01-2004 07:25 PM | |
| Amended Return? JB: My 18 year old son just went online and electronically filed his taxes via the H&R Block Web Site. The problem is he checked box 6A (1040)... | Taxes | 2 | 02-10-2004 03:30 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |