|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Herb Smith at smithff33[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > Why do you think the "problem" would go away in three years?
I have had a situation where a client sold stock over a 5> The three-year statute of limitations only applies to > REFUNDS, not tax owed. That is more like 10 uears (if no > fraud is involved). > I'm sure a lot of tax scofflws would be glad to hear of your > 3-year statute of limitations :-) year period, and screwed up the basis beyond belief. The stock had been purchased over a long period of time with dividend reinvestment and multiple splits. Because the issues were all related to the same stock, I filed 5 amended returns, 3 in the open years and 2 in the closed years and sent them all in under a cover letter explaining the relationship between them. The two returns in the closed years owed the Treasury a total of about $7,000 (basis had been understated and refund issued instead of balance due). My request for amendment was "denied" citing the fact that they returns were outside the statute of limitations. The earliest open year was accepted along with a balance due of a few hundred dollars. This resulted from counting the LTCL carryover against ordinary income. The two remaining open years were due a refund of about $3500. They were accepted and the check was issued. My client wanted to get "straight" with the IRS. I felt that the most optimistic scenario would have been that she would avoid the extra tax in the closed years but lose the refund on the basis that it was caused by earlier mistakes. Not so, the IRS wrote off the amount she owed and gave her the refund she was due in the open years. This is the most graphic demonstration I have seen that they are serious about the 3 year statute of limitations, no matter who it favors. None of these mistakes were fraudulent. All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Herb Smith wrote: SNIP - quote - > Why do you think the "problem" would go away in three years?
The IRS has 3 years to assess additional tax on a filed> The three-year statute of limitations only applies to > REFUNDS, not tax owed. That is more like 10 uears (if no > fraud is involved). > I'm sure a lot of tax scofflws would be glad to hear of your > 3-year statute of limitations :-) return; 6 years if enough income is omitted. After that, they cannot assess more taxes and claim you owe more money. They have 10 years to collect the tax ONCE IT IS ASSESSED. If they do not assess the tax within the 3 year limitation, the 10 year collection period does not apply. Lanny K. Williams, CPA Nawarat, Williams & Co, Ltd. Income Tax Services for Expatriate Americans << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I filed my taxes few weeks back and got my refund also. Now
Why do you think the "problem" would go away in three years?> > I recd a 1099-INT from one of my bank for US$25.66. > > > Question is do I need to do an amendment? > Legally, yes, you should. Practically, I am not sure you > are doing the IRS a favor. If you are in the highest tax > bracket 35%, you will owe the U.S. Treasury $8.98, in the > lowest, $2.57. I am sure it costs the IRS more than that to > open the envelope and process the return. > I think I would sit tight for 3 years and the problem will > go away on 15 April 2007. If the IRS does send you a > letter, they will want about 4-5% interest on the amount due > since 15 April 2004. The three-year statute of limitations only applies to REFUNDS, not tax owed. That is more like 10 uears (if no fraud is involved). I'm sure a lot of tax scofflws would be glad to hear of your 3-year statute of limitations :-) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I filed my taxes few weeks back and got my refund also. Now
Legally, yes, you should. Practically, I am not sure you> I recd a 1099-INT from one of my bank for US$25.66. > Question is do I need to do an amendment? are doing the IRS a favor. If you are in the highest tax bracket 35%, you will owe the U.S. Treasury $8.98, in the lowest, $2.57. I am sure it costs the IRS more than that to open the envelope and process the return. I think I would sit tight for 3 years and the problem will go away on 15 April 2007. If the IRS does send you a letter, they will want about 4-5% interest on the amount due since 15 April 2004. All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I filed my taxes few weeks back and got my refund also. Now I recd a 1099-INT from one of my bank for US$25.66. Question is do I need to do an amendment? What are the consequences of not showing this amount in my tax return. Any help or advise is highly appreciated. Thanks << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 1099int |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| 1099-B Lee: IS Ms Money 2007 Deluxe capable of tracking 1099-B form transactions? I can't seem to get the Tax Reports it show anything for 1099-B nor figure... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-04-2008 03:41 AM | |
| No 1099....yet JLaB13: I just received an memo from my company that stated that they weren't going to send out our 1099's 'til the end of Feb. Is this possible? I... | Taxes | 4 | 02-11-2004 12:22 PM | |
| 1099 to LLC Bill Lentz: Is an LLC considered a corporation for purposes of 1099 (non) reporting? Thanks Bill Lentz <<... | Taxes | 3 | 02-03-2004 12:13 AM | |
| Old 1099 and w-9 Will Wright: In 2001 the business was closed and I moved and retired. Note, a 1099 or W-9 form had never been discussed with the manufacture and I reported the... | Taxes | 5 | 01-27-2004 08:20 AM | |
| 1099 or W-2?? Greg Alaksdjflk: I was offered an option by the company I work with to work full time at $100,000.00/year+benefits or by independent contract (1099)... | Taxes | 7 | 08-04-2003 07:29 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |