|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Jess wrote: - quote - > So you are saying if they do share the house (same kitchen,
If it's a single dwelling unit, then the regulation clearly> living room, dining room and entrance, the 4 bedrooms are > the only area in the house dedicated to each roommate), he > is entitled to the $250,000 principle residence exemption > even though he is renting out such a large portion(75%) of > the house? allows the exclusion. Note that they "dovetail" the rule with the one for Section 280A and the vacation home/office in home rules--which means you would need to explain if somehow you had been taking a loss on the rental without regard to Section 280A's limits. The regulations was intentionally designed so you couldn't have your cake and eat it too <grin> . -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Ed Zollars, CPA" <ezollar[at]mindspring.com> wrote: - quote - > Jess wrote:
Ed,> > Under the new December 2002 regulations, if you rent out > > rooms in your home (principal residence), when you sell, you > > no longer need to pay capital gain on the rental part of the > > property. Is there any limitation on the proportion of home > > rented ? What if the person rented out 75% of the house, is > > he still ok ? (Assuming 2 out of 5 years requirement met) > The keys issue is the separate dwelling unit rule found in > Regulation 1.121-1--if the 75% meets that test, then he > won't be treated as using that portion as his principal > residence. So you need to examine the exact facts of his > situation to see if he was truly "sharing" one dwelling unit > or whether his renter and he had, essentially, separate > dwelling units. > If they each had their own entrances, kitchen facilities, > restrooms and have to exit the building to go into the other > party's section, you have major problems <grin> . > See Regulation 1.121-1(e)(4) Example 4 for a discussion of > the separate dwelling unit rule. Thanks for your reply! So you are saying if they do share the house (same kitchen, living room, dining room and entrance, the 4 bedrooms are the only area in the house dedicated to each roommate), he is entitled to the $250,000 principle residence exemption even though he is renting out such a large portion(75%) of the house? Thanks! << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Jess wrote: - quote - > Under the new December 2002 regulations, if you rent out
The keys issue is the separate dwelling unit rule found in> rooms in your home (principal residence), when you sell, you > no longer need to pay capital gain on the rental part of the > property. Is there any limitation on the proportion of home > rented ? What if the person rented out 75% of the house, is > he still ok ? (Assuming 2 out of 5 years requirement met) Regulation 1.121-1--if the 75% meets that test, then he won't be treated as using that portion as his principal residence. So you need to examine the exact facts of his situation to see if he was truly "sharing" one dwelling unit or whether his renter and he had, essentially, separate dwelling units. If they each had their own entrances, kitchen facilities, restrooms and have to exit the building to go into the other party's section, you have major problems <grin> . See Regulation 1.121-1(e)(4) Example 4 for a discussion of the separate dwelling unit rule. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Under the new December 2002 regulations, if you rent out rooms in your home (principal residence), when you sell, you no longer need to pay capital gain on the rental part of the property. Is there any limitation on the proportion of home rented ? What if the person rented out 75% of the house, is he still ok ? (Assuming 2 out of 5 years requirement met) He is single living in a four bedroom house with three roommates. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| home, partly, rental, sale |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Sale of Rental Property - Improvements Lois: I have some questions regarding the reporting of some aspects of the sale of rental property. Rental property consisting of land and buildings... | Taxes | 3 | 04-12-2004 11:12 AM | |
| Re: Sale of rental property converted from personal use Arthur L. Rubin: Michael I. Holzman wrote: > Background: I bought real estate in 1988 for $123,000 and > used if for personal use until 1994 when I moved to... | Taxes | 2 | 04-08-2004 07:05 PM | |
| sale of rental Wcm7315: I've had a rental property that I've rented for 35 years. It is fully depreciated. I would like to sell it to the tenants and hold the mortgage. ... | Taxes | 5 | 09-04-2003 09:13 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |