|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Thanks All, After posting my original message, I found more information that made it clear that both houses can be excluded (each for up to $250k) on joint returns. See the "Nancy and Oscar" example in the "The Home Sale Gain Exclusion" on the AICPA website: http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/oct2002/foran.htm The "Nancy and Oscar" example in that article is exactly like my scenario, in the details that are relevant to my scenario: ================================================== =============== Example. Nancy and Oscar marry in 2001 and move into an apartment. The couple each separately owned and used a home for at least two years before marrying. Nancy and Oscar sell their separate homes in 2002. Nancy realizes a gain of $225,000 on the sale of her home and Oscar realizes a gain of $275,000 on his sale. Although Nancy and Oscar do not meet the requirements to exclude up to $500,000 of gain on their joint return, each spouse may exclude up to $250,000. Therefore, Nancy and Oscar will exclude $225,000 from the sale of Nancy's home and $250,000 from the sale of Oscar's home. Because Oscar cannot use any of Nancy's unused exclusion, the couple must include $25,000 of the gain on his home in income. The result would be the same if Nancy and Oscar each had sold their homes before marrying. ================================================== =============== Unfortunately, my wife's old house didn't, and my old house certainly won't, sell for nearly as much gain as Nancy and Oscar's houses did! :-) Thanks, Greg << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Greg Lovern wrote: - quote - > A is single and buys a house. B is also single, and also
I don't believe that they need to file MFS, nor would the> buys a house. Years later, A and B meet, get married, buy a > third house and move into it. > Two years later, A's original house is sold and passes all > tests for a Section 121 exclusion. > To pass the "Use Test", B's original house must be sold > within another year. But, would that fail the "More than one > home sold during 2-year period" test? (A and B weren't aware > of the "More than one home sold during 2-year period" test > until now.) > In my reading of Publication 523 ("Selling Your Home"), > especially pages 9 and 13, whether it would fail the "More > than one home sold during 2-year period" test seems to hinge > on how State law would determine ownership of the two houses > -- whether they are still considered to be each owned > separately by A and B, or both became community property on > the wedding date. > A and B have always lived in Washington State. The > Washington State Bar Association's web site has this > statement under "Marriage in Washington State" > "Property > Ownership": > Perhaps each of you owned property before your marriage, > such as stocks, bonds or other property either purchased > with separate funds, inherited or given to you. This is not > community property. Also, any inheritance received after > marriage is not community property. Such "separate" property > remains yours, and yours alone, as long as it is kept > separate from the community property. Husbands and wives > may, with appropriate documents, change separate property > into community property. << > It's at: > http://www.wsba.org/media/publicatio...s/marriage.htm > This seems to indicate that the two houses bought before the > marriage would still be considered separate property in > Washington State -- unless A and B changed them into > community property with appropriate documents, which they > have not. > If A and B file a joint return with a Section 121 exclusion > (for less than $250K) for the sale of A's original house, > then sell B's original house a year later, can they take a > Section 121 exclusion (again for less than $250K) on B's > original house? > Would they need to file separately for the years that the > Section 121 exceptions are taken, with A taking the > exclusion for A's original house, and B taking the exclusion > for B's original house? > BTW, none of the exceptions on page 16, nor the "Special Situations" > on page 26, apply. "once in 2 years" rule be violated because in one sale, only A qualifies and in the other, only B qualifies. Neither of them are selling more than one qualified home in the 2 year window. You may want to explicitly say which spouse qualifies on each return by specifically listing the sale (and the exclusion) instead of leaving it off. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Greg Lovern wrote: - quote - > A is single and buys a house. B is also single, and also
Looks OK to me. Ask again after April 15, for a more> buys a house. Years later, A and B meet, get married, buy a > third house and move into it. > Two years later, A's original house is sold and passes all > tests for a Section 121 exclusion. > To pass the "Use Test", B's original house must be sold > within another year. But, would that fail the "More than one > home sold during 2-year period" test? (A and B weren't aware > of the "More than one home sold during 2-year period" test > until now.) detailed response. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A is single and buys a house. B is also single, and also buys a house. Years later, A and B meet, get married, buy a third house and move into it. Two years later, A's original house is sold and passes all tests for a Section 121 exclusion. To pass the "Use Test", B's original house must be sold within another year. But, would that fail the "More than one home sold during 2-year period" test? (A and B weren't aware of the "More than one home sold during 2-year period" test until now.) In my reading of Publication 523 ("Selling Your Home"), especially pages 9 and 13, whether it would fail the "More than one home sold during 2-year period" test seems to hinge on how State law would determine ownership of the two houses -- whether they are still considered to be each owned separately by A and B, or both became community property on the wedding date. A and B have always lived in Washington State. The Washington State Bar Association's web site has this statement under "Marriage in Washington State" > "Property Ownership": Perhaps each of you owned property before your marriage, such as stocks, bonds or other property either purchased with separate funds, inherited or given to you. This is not community property. Also, any inheritance received after marriage is not community property. Such "separate" property remains yours, and yours alone, as long as it is kept separate from the community property. Husbands and wives may, with appropriate documents, change separate property into community property. << It's at: http://www.wsba.org/media/publicatio...s/marriage.htm This seems to indicate that the two houses bought before the marriage would still be considered separate property in Washington State -- unless A and B changed them into community property with appropriate documents, which they have not. If A and B file a joint return with a Section 121 exclusion (for less than $250K) for the sale of A's original house, then sell B's original house a year later, can they take a Section 121 exclusion (again for less than $250K) on B's original house? Would they need to file separately for the years that the Section 121 exceptions are taken, with A taking the exclusion for A's original house, and B taking the exclusion for B's original house? BTW, none of the exceptions on page 16, nor the "Special Situations" on page 26, apply. Thanks, Greg << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 121, exclusion, question, section |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Alabama retirement exclusion Vic Dura: Does any Alabama preparer know if AL allows the exclusion of retirement payments from Alcoa? Someone swears that his tax preparer says the... | Taxes | 5 | 02-16-2004 07:49 PM | |
| residence gain exclusion don sugarman: I had lived in a home which qualified as my main residence for 5 years, and last year I bought a new home which I'm living in. I kept the old home... | Taxes | 4 | 02-12-2004 06:15 AM | |
| Exclusion of residence HW \Skip\ Weldon: Person owns home and land the home sits on, two lots next to it (separate deeds), and a lot across the street (separate deed). The separate lots... | Taxes | 3 | 02-06-2004 09:38 AM | |
| Section 179 question Dave: My wife recently started as an independent contractor and we are looking to purchase office equipment for her, including a computer, etc. This... | Taxes | 1 | 12-18-2003 11:15 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |