Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #7  
Old 04-13-2004, 07:18 AM
MTW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:

- quote -

> Never had a case of refusal
> to sign, not that's that my concern anyway.


It can sort of become your concern when one or both come
back and ask you to prepare a separate return. <g> Then
you're left in a potentially sticky mess because you are in
possession of information furnished by the OTHER spouse with
an expectation that a joint return would be filed. Can you
safely use that information with respect to a separate
return without the other spouse's knowledge or consent?
(Fortunately, I've never been officially pursued by the
"other" spouse in a situation like this, but there have been
veiled threats and I've often lost sleep over it.)

- quote -

> One size never fits all. there have been cases when I
> didn't want to touch EITHER return.


I hear ya'! I've often thought my "default" approach should
be to tell BOTH to get lost until after the divorce is
final.

MTW

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #6  
Old 04-13-2004, 06:40 AM
CLJ1219
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

- quote -

> One size never fits all. there have been cases when I
> didn't want to touch EITHER return.


We had clients who separated early in the year a couple of
years ago. They agreed to file MFJ for the year prior to
their separation. By the time the next year rolled around,
we notified them that we we would not do any returns for
them, personal or corporate, until the divorce was final.
Things were finally settled but the hostility they had for
each other came through when they talked to us. We finally
told them we wouldn't do returns for either of them at all.

Carol
What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #5  
Old 04-12-2004, 09:35 AM
Harlan Lunsford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

MTW wrote:
- quote -

> Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:

> > If both agree to file a joint return, the preparer has no
> > conflict of interest.


> I'm not so sure about that. There is still lots of room for
> one spouse or the other to claim that they got a raw deal,
> and that you didn't adequately disclose the circumstances.
> Plus, in a fair number of cases where I have prepared a
> joint return for a divorcing couple, one spouse or the other
> eventually refuses to sign it in spite any prior agreement
> to do so.


Of course EVERY case depends on "facts and circumstances"
(God, I love that term!)

So I should add that I have to be 99% sure that they'll
still agree to sign before I prepare. However, still, I
just prepare the return when they WANT me to prepare the
return. And that's understood. Never had a case of refusal
to sign, not that's that my concern anyway.

- quote -

> I wish there was a "good" way to handle divorcing clients,
> but there just doesn't seem to be. These days I lean very
> much in the "old school" direction. That is, you pick ONE
> spouse and you prepare a separate return for them. Period.


One size never fits all. there have been cases when I
didn't want to touch EITHER return.

Cheer$$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA
T minus 7 and counting..............

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #4  
Old 04-08-2004, 09:00 PM
MTW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> wrote:

- quote -

> If both agree to file a joint return, the preparer has no
> conflict of interest.


I'm not so sure about that. There is still lots of room for
one spouse or the other to claim that they got a raw deal,
and that you didn't adequately disclose the circumstances.
Plus, in a fair number of cases where I have prepared a
joint return for a divorcing couple, one spouse or the other
eventually refuses to sign it in spite any prior agreement
to do so.

I wish there was a "good" way to handle divorcing clients,
but there just doesn't seem to be. These days I lean very
much in the "old school" direction. That is, you pick ONE
spouse and you prepare a separate return for them. Period.

MTW

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #3  
Old 04-08-2004, 09:00 PM
MTW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

BM30003700 <bm30003700[at]aol.com> wrote:

- quote -

> Having said that, what do I do when a divorcing couple wish
> to file for an extension? Does the extension permit them to
> file either MFS or MFJ by the extended due date?


I'm not sure that it really makes any difference as far as
the IRS is concerned, but I have often filed "separate"
extensions in this case.

MTW

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #2  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:44 AM
Harlan Lunsford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

BM30003700 wrote:

Incidentally, what does the BM30003700 stand for? a CPA
registration number? It's not an EA # I'm sure.

- quote -

> I've been told that, when preparing a joing return for two
> people who are getting divorced, a conflict of interest is
> possible.


If both agree to file a joint return, the preparer has no
conflict of interest. He prepares it and shows both what's
in it and how it's prepared. He then collects his fee,
releases the return for them to sign and mail; or not sign
and throw away. Job's done.

- quote -

> Further, I was told that, in such a situation, the
> practitioner should decide which of the two persons the
> practitioner wishes to represent.


If a joint return, he doesn't have to represent either or
both from that time forward.

- quote -

> I was also told that to prevent conflict of interest, the
> practioner should then, at the very least,


Not at the "very least", but has the duty to sit down face
to face with both ... and....

- quote -

> talk with the two
> persons together, show them what two returns filing married
> filing separate look like, in addition to showing them what
> a jointly filed return looks like,


Yes, show both possibilities, even calculating each's
separate refund if MFS.

make a recommendation,

No. I simply show the facts and they make the decision.

- quote -

> and tell the person not represented by the practitioner that
> the practitioner is representing the other person, and that
> the person not represented by the practitioner should seek
> their own independent counsel.


Again, representation doesn't come into play at this point.
BTW, who told you all this, anyway? a lawyer? (gasp!

- quote -

> Having said that, what do I do when a divorcing couple wish
> to file for an extension? Does the extension permit them to
> file either MFS or MFJ by the extended due date? Couldn't
> filing an extension create a bias for the client not
> represented by the practioner to file MFJ?. For example, if
> the client not represented by the practitioner would owe a
> late payment penalty filing a MFS return by the due date,
> but no penalty by filing a MFJ return by the due date,
> hasn't the practioner created a bias by filing an extension,
> unless the extension permits them to file eithe MFS or MFJ?


To make a long story short, if an extension is warranted,
then two extensions should be prepared.

If they later decide to reconcile, or file jointly, no harm
done.

BTW, I'm expecting my perennial fighting couple in next
week. they're not divorced yet! lol

Cheer$$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #1  
Old 04-07-2004, 09:46 AM
Phoebe Roberts, EA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

BM30003700 wrote:

- quote -

> what do I do when a divorcing couple wish
> to file for an extension?


Prepare one extension for the husband and a second, separate
extension for the wife. IMHO, if they're still
contemplating filing jointly, they're both your client
(because in a joint return situation, they're both your
client).

Phoebe

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 
Old 04-07-2004, 09:08 AM
CLJ1219
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

- quote -

> Further, I was told that, in such a situation, the
> practitioner should decide which of the two persons the
> practitioner wishes to represent.


We have several clients who have gone through a divorce. It
does create headaches for us, some of which we have yet to
recover from. What we generally do, if an extension is in
order, is to file a MFJ extension and then let them decide
how they want to file and based upon that, decide which one,
if either, we will prepare returns for. We had an amicably
divorcing couple who *both* wanted us to do their returns
and we did so. We also had a couple who had a very nasty
divorce, both wanted us to do returns for them but we sent
both on their merry way. I think the key is how they get
along with each other. Most of our clients are small
business owners and that may make a difference.

Carol
What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed.

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #-1  
Old 04-05-2004, 08:50 PM
BM30003700
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default extension for mfj/couple now divorced/conflict of interest

I've been told that, when preparing a joing return for two
people who are getting divorced, a conflict of interest is
possible.

Further, I was told that, in such a situation, the
practitioner should decide which of the two persons the
practitioner wishes to represent.

I was also told that to prevent conflict of interest, the
practioner should then, at the very least, talk with the two
persons together, show them what two returns filing married
filing separate look like, in addition to showing them what
a jointly filed return looks like, make a recommendation,
and tell the person not represented by the practitioner that
the practitioner is representing the other person, and that
the person not represented by the practitioner should seek
their own independent counsel.

Having said that, what do I do when a divorcing couple wish
to file for an extension? Does the extension permit them to
file either MFS or MFJ by the extended due date? Couldn't
filing an extension create a bias for the client not
represented by the practioner to file MFJ?. For example, if
the client not represented by the practitioner would owe a
late payment penalty filing a MFS return by the due date,
but no penalty by filing a MFJ return by the due date,
hasn't the practioner created a bias by filing an extension,
unless the extension permits them to file eithe MFS or MFJ?

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 

Tags
divorced or conflict, extension, interest, mfj or couple
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Gettting divorced - How to handle in MS Money Plus
dutchy999: After 15 yrs of marriage I'm getting divorced. My spouse is no longer willing to share her transaction data with me. I could start a new file, but I...
Microsoft Money 8 11-09-2007 01:07 AM
Money Strategy for a couple
BAndrews: I tried setting up money to manage both of our bills and shared bills but this seems impossible. I can't view just my bills with just my payees,...
Microsoft Money 1 07-21-2004 01:17 AM
Divorced - legally liable for 62% of all day care, but can't claim??
Traci: My Husband is divorced, within their divorce it states that he is allowed to claim one child on his taxes, while she is allowed to claim the other...
Taxes 5 02-26-2004 04:33 PM
Unmarried Couple - Both Individuals Took Same Mortgage Interest Deduction
Seth Tomblyn: My girlfriend and I are not married and we own a house together. Her filing address is different than mine (she reports a Mail Boxes etc. address...
Taxes 10 02-23-2004 04:41 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:35 AM.