|
#18
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > The unreimbursed business expenses are reported as
Full amount.> > deductions on Form 2106, which then goes to schedule A, > > miscellaneous itemized deductions. The total wages plus > > housing allowance reported on schedule SE is reduced by > > those deductions, > Which deductions? The ones on Form 2106, or the (2% of AGI) > Sch. A ones? > I'm wondering if her income for SE tax purposes should be > reduced by the full amount of her unreimbursed business > expenses, or if she is only able to reduce her SE income by > the amount that exceeds 2% of her AGI? For example, one who does not itemize such deductions esp because of the higher standard deduction, makes a side calculation to arrive at proper amount SE taxable. Cheer$$$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > The unreimbursed business expenses are reported as
The SE income is reduced by the TOTAL unreimbursed employee> > deductions on Form 2106, which then goes to schedule A, > > miscellaneous itemized deductions. The total wages plus > > housing allowance reported on schedule SE is reduced by > > those deductions, > Which deductions? The ones on Form 2106, or the (2% of AGI) > Sch. A ones? > I'm wondering if her income for SE tax purposes should be > reduced by the full amount of her unreimbursed business > expenses, or if she is only able to reduce her SE income by > the amount that exceeds 2% of her AGI? business expense - there is no 2% reduction. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > The unreimbursed business expenses are reported as
Which deductions? The ones on Form 2106, or the (2% of AGI)> deductions on Form 2106, which then goes to schedule A, > miscellaneous itemized deductions. The total wages plus > housing allowance reported on schedule SE is reduced by > those deductions, Sch. A ones? I'm wondering if her income for SE tax purposes should be reduced by the full amount of her unreimbursed business expenses, or if she is only able to reduce her SE income by the amount that exceeds 2% of her AGI? ~wch << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Bill wrote: - quote - > "MAT1040X" <mat1040x[at]aol.com> wrote:
Use any "form" you wish, yellow legal pad, green accounting> > Ministers are considered self-employed for Social Security > > purposes only. They are never subject to FICA/Medicare > > withholding by their church employer. Instead, they pay SE > > tax through their tax return. And they pay it on their > > entire compensation - wages plus housing allowance (reduced > > by any unreimbursed employee business expense.) > Ahhh....and here is where my question comes in. > My mother receives one of these W-2s as she is a missionary. > How does one report the unreimbursed employee business > expenses to arrive at the SE tax number? She has W-2 wages > (w/o any withholding) and a housing allowance, and then a > ton of unreimbursed business expenses. I had planned on > going with Sch. A, but then how does that flow to the SE tax > form? paper, white plain paper; even back of an envelope (like Lincoln! lol). It's a side calculation, or worksheet you retain for your files. Cheer$$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Ministers are considered self-employed for Social Security
The unreimbursed business expenses are reported as> > purposes only. They are never subject to FICA/Medicare > > withholding by their church employer. Instead, they pay SE > > tax through their tax return. And they pay it on their > > entire compensation - wages plus housing allowance (reduced > > by any unreimbursed employee business expense.) > Ahhh....and here is where my question comes in. > My mother receives one of these W-2s as she is a missionary. > How does one report the unreimbursed employee business > expenses to arrive at the SE tax number? She has W-2 wages > (w/o any withholding) and a housing allowance, and then a > ton of unreimbursed business expenses. I had planned on > going with Sch. A, but then how does that flow to the SE tax > form? deductions on Form 2106, which then goes to schedule A, miscellaneous itemized deductions. The total wages plus housing allowance reported on schedule SE is reduced by those deductions, leaving a lesser amount subject to SE tax. A schedule should be attached indicating how this number was arrived at. As to "flowing" to schedule SE, if you are using tax software there is usually a place for 'other non-farm income' to be entered. The business expenses are entered as a negative number. Mary Ann Thomas, EA in AZ << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "MAT1040X" <mat1040x[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Ministers are considered self-employed for Social Security
Ahhh....and here is where my question comes in.> purposes only. They are never subject to FICA/Medicare > withholding by their church employer. Instead, they pay SE > tax through their tax return. And they pay it on their > entire compensation - wages plus housing allowance (reduced > by any unreimbursed employee business expense.) My mother receives one of these W-2s as she is a missionary. How does one report the unreimbursed employee business expenses to arrive at the SE tax number? She has W-2 wages (w/o any withholding) and a housing allowance, and then a ton of unreimbursed business expenses. I had planned on going with Sch. A, but then how does that flow to the SE tax form? ~wch << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> wrote: - quote - > D. Stussy wrote:
Some ministers do recieve 1099s. What's the problem?> > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at > > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > > completely.... > An acquaintance was in yesterday because I had volunteered > to give her self prepared return a once over or as some call > it, a "look-see". > So she was telling me how she ws the bookkeeper for her > church (hence the schedule CEZ) and we talked about > preachers. She told how he used to give the old preacher a > W2 and this new preacher absolutely did NOT want a W2, but > a 1099-misc instead. > Also during the conversation she reinforced my conception > about how preachers lie about finances, and especially > taxes. And we weren't even talking about Methodists > ministers, either! lol << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > If you go to churchlawtoday.com, you will be able to access
Churches are not required to file for 501(c)(3) status - but> > a great deal of information on ministers. > And what about churches, mary Ann? > I've a tax client, who is also an 1120s client and a new LLC > client, who asked just the other day about 503(c) status. > Seems that certain member of his (previous) church have > split and are forming their own church, and they consulted a > lawyer who said asked an accountant about getting 503(c) > status. > I told him as far as I know, churches don't need no 503c > status, i.e. they stand on their own. > How about it? anybody? many do just to be ablsolutlely certain of their status. churchlawtoday.com also has many answers to church related questions. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at
Harlan - Sorry you have had such bad experiences with> > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > > completely.... > An acquaintance was in yesterday because I had volunteered > to give her self prepared return a once over or as some call > it, a "look-see". > So she was telling me how she ws the bookkeeper for her > church (hence the schedule CEZ) and we talked about > preachers. She told how he used to give the old preacher a > W2 and this new preacher absolutely did NOT want a W2, but > a 1099-misc instead. > Also during the conversation she reinforced my conception > about how preachers lie about finances, and especially > taxes. And we weren't even talking about Methodists > ministers, either! lol clergy. I do many minister tax returns and my experience is that they all bend over backward to report their taxes correctly. Often they do not want to even take deductions that they are legally eligible for. Not a liar or cheat among them. In fact, they are among the most honest and forthright people I deal with. Mary Ann Thomas, EA in AZ << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > > Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for
And what about churches, mary Ann?> > > employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they > > > are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is > > > the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS > > > wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare > > > withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to > > > compute and report the SE taxes that are due. > > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at > > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > > completely.... > If you go to churchlawtoday.com, you will be able to access > a great deal of information on ministers. I've a tax client, who is also an 1120s client and a new LLC client, who asked just the other day about 503(c) status. Seems that certain member of his (previous) church have split and are forming their own church, and they consulted a lawyer who said asked an accountant about getting 503(c) status. I told him as far as I know, churches don't need no 503c status, i.e. they stand on their own. How about it? anybody? Cheer$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at
An acquaintance was in yesterday because I had volunteered> the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > completely.... to give her self prepared return a once over or as some call it, a "look-see". So she was telling me how she ws the bookkeeper for her church (hence the schedule CEZ) and we talked about preachers. She told how he used to give the old preacher a W2 and this new preacher absolutely did NOT want a W2, but a 1099-misc instead. Also during the conversation she reinforced my conception about how preachers lie about finances, and especially taxes. And we weren't even talking about Methodists ministers, either! lol Cheer$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > Rich Carreiro wrote:
I've only seen a couple done this way, the correct way.> > "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> writes: > > > How does one have a "self-employed" minister with a housing > > > allowance in the first place? Doesn't he have to be an > > Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for > > employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they > > are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is > > the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS > > wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare > > withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to > > compute and report the SE taxes that are due. > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > completely.... After all, publication says a minister is a common law employee of the church, and as such, gets a W2 form. And if the church consents, they may withhold income taxes for federal and state. Cheer$$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for
If you go to churchlawtoday.com, you will be able to access> > employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they > > are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is > > the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS > > wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare > > withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to > > compute and report the SE taxes that are due. > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > completely.... a great deal of information on ministers. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for
Then take it up with the people who wrote IRS Publication> > employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they > > are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is > > the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS > > wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare > > withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to > > compute and report the SE taxes that are due. > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > completely.... 517, because that's what they say to do. Take a look at the bottom sample W-2 on page 14 of the 2003 edition of Pub 517. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy wrote: - quote - > Rich Carreiro wrote:
I have seen a few. It is called a parsonage allowance.> > "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> writes: > > > How does one have a "self-employed" minister with a housing > > > allowance in the first place? Doesn't he have to be an > > Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for > > employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they > > are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is > > the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS > > wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare > > withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to > > compute and report the SE taxes that are due. > I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at > the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system > completely.... -- Frederick E. Jorden http://Tax-Accounting-Payroll.com 7825 Midlothian Tpk - 207 Richmond, VA 23235-5247 EMAIL knowtax[at]bigfoot.com (804) 320-6210 FAX (804) 320-6211 << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Rich Carreiro wrote: - quote - > "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> writes:
I've never seen a W-2 like that [not even when I worked at> > How does one have a "self-employed" minister with a housing > > allowance in the first place? Doesn't he have to be an > Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for > employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they > are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is > the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS > wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare > withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to > compute and report the SE taxes that are due. the IRS ]- except for those who elected out of the SS system completely.... << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > How does one have a "self-employed" minister with a housing
Ministers are considered self-employed for Social Security> allowance in the first place? Doesn't he have to be an > employee of the church offering the allowance in order to > get it and be able to exclude it from the income tax side? > :-) > I agree that IRC 107 only says "as part of his > compensation," but I don't see how a minister can be > considered ordained without a supporting church that in turn > he is considered an employee of..... Therefore, isn't the > housing allowance otherwise considered wages if it weren't > excludible....? purposes only. They are never subject to FICA/Medicare withholding by their church employer. Instead, they pay SE tax through their tax return. And they pay it on their entire compensation - wages plus housing allowance (reduced by any unreimbursed employee business expense.) For all other purposes, ministers are common law employees. Mary Ann Thomas, EA in AZ << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote: [snip] - quote - > ....I don't see how a minister can be
It is extremely common for a "Minister of the Word and> considered ordained without a supporting church that in turn > he is considered an employee of..... Therefore, isn't the > housing allowance otherwise considered wages if it weren't > excludible....? Sacrament" to be considered self-employed while also being compensated in the form of salary and housing allowance. Different denominations have different practices in this respect, and the IRS generally honors them. In high-cost-of-housing areas such as Southern California, the majority of a minister's pay may even be in the form of housing allowance. The trouble comes when actual housing expenses don't come close to housing allowance; see the Rick Warren case. Taxation of those who labor for churches is a specialized area, in which the definitions and classifications that are customary elewhere often do not apply. -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "D. Stussy" <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> writes: - quote - > How does one have a "self-employed" minister with a housing
Ordained ministers are considered self-employed for> allowance in the first place? Doesn't he have to be an employment tax purposes, even when (as is most common) they are considered employees for income tax purposes. So it is the norm for a minister to get a W-2 that shows zero SS wages, zero Medicare wages, and zero SS and medicare withholding. The minister will then use Schedule SE to compute and report the SE taxes that are due. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Rich Carreiro wrote: - quote - > From my various readings it appears to me that if a cleric
How does one have a "self-employed" minister with a housing> lives rent-free in church-owned housing, the cleric *does* > have to report the fair market rent of that housing as > income for computing the self-employment tax but *not* for > computing the income tax. In other words, the FMV rental is > included in the "net self-employment income" line of > Schedule SE, but is not included anywhere on 1040. > (1) Is my understanding correct? > (2) Is there an IRS Publication that clearly lays this out? > I've been trying to convince some people that my > understanding is correct, and I'd like to have something > "official" I could point to. allowance in the first place? Doesn't he have to be an employee of the church offering the allowance in order to get it and be able to exclude it from the income tax side? :-) I agree that IRC 107 only says "as part of his compensation," but I don't see how a minister can be considered ordained without a supporting church that in turn he is considered an employee of..... Therefore, isn't the housing allowance otherwise considered wages if it weren't excludible....? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| churchprovided, clergy, fmv, housing, include, income |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Clergy Housing Allowance & spouse income Dennis C: If a member of the clergy owns a home together with his spouse (not a clergy) who works outside of the church, in calculating the yearly housing... | Taxes | 1 | 02-11-2004 01:58 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |