|
#6
| |||
| |||
| philmarti[at]aol.com (Phil Marti) writes: - quote - > When can you relax? The day you mail your properly prepared
Bad choice of words there. Do not mail your records with> return with the records to back up what's on it. your return. Keep good records, prepare an accurate return, and relax once it's done. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Joseph J. Greenberg" <news[at]greenberg.diespammerdie.net> wrote: - quote - > This might be a real newbie question, but I've often
Refunds on the current tax return or even on an amended> wondered: While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back > in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), > is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for > a given year that they're not going to revisit that form > unless and until something gives them reason to suspect > something on it? Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that > your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from > employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in > more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their > "leisure"? > In other words, assuming a fairly straight-forward return > that one has answered honestly, when can one relax? return are acknoledgement of nothing and no cause for assuming that it is time to relax. Watch the statute of limitations period instead. Larry << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Joseph J. Greenberg" wrote... - quote - > This might be a real newbie question, but I've often
Not really, a math check of all the sub totals from all> wondered: While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back > in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), > is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for > a given year that they're not going to revisit that form > unless and until something gives them reason to suspect > something on it? schedules is all that really occurs during initial processing & assessment. - quote - > Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that
The process is very rigid as far as a time lines are> your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from > employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in > more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their > "leisure"? concerned, at leisure is not the principal, the Statute of limitations is un forgiving, if it's blown potential revenue is lost. Tax Year 2002, filed=4/5/2003, CP-2000 review Early summer-2004 to late spring-2005, Statute to get all cases closed is 4/15/2006 The W-2 match is one of about eight major sub class (RUNS) that are processed, all tax returns reflecting an error of entries on line-7 as compared to composite of W-2 processed by the under reporter examiners. Tens of thousands of returns are screened for these potential errors in the 2nd summer after the return was filed, Then they might move on to the sub-class of all returns where investment income is missing (Interest & Dividends), Then on to all returns which have Schedule C,E,F and have a miss-match on 1099-Misc income (NEC,RENT) - quote - > In other words, assuming a fairly straight-forward return
The statute of limitations is the safest answer to that> that one has answered honestly, when can one relax? question. What I describe above is one MAJOR program, the other programs are: A random audit aka (Tax Compliance Measurement program), who will review all your records in person to confirm that you reported your liability accurately, many times these audits confirm that you did a perfectly accurate job. Complex issues involving a Revenue Agent (highly skilled auditor) who review difficult to trace or validate deductions and other entries. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Joseph J. Greenberg" <news[at]greenberg.diespammerdie.net> wrote: - quote - > This might be a real newbie question, but I've often
Your second analysis is correct - the refund check doesn't> wondered: While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back > in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), > is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for > a given year that they're not going to revisit that form > unless and until something gives them reason to suspect > something on it? Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that > your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from > employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in > more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their > "leisure"? > In other words, assuming a fairly straight-forward return > that one has answered honestly, when can one relax? mean much more than your numbers added up and there was nothing in their computers at the time to contradict what you put on your return. You can relax after the statute of limitations has passed. Of course, this begs the question - if your return is "straight-forward and honest" why aren't you already relaxed? Gene E. Utterback, EA =================== Moderator: Paranoia =================== << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Joseph J. Greenberg wrote: - quote - > This might be a real newbie question, but I've often
You can relax for 365 days a year, each and every year, if> wondered: While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back > in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), > is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for > a given year that they're not going to revisit that form > unless and until something gives them reason to suspect > something on it? Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that > your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from > employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in > more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their > "leisure"? > In other words, assuming a fairly straight-forward return > that one has answered honestly, when can one relax? the contents of the tax return you mailed to the IRS was to the best of your knowledge and belief, true, correct and complete. See the words above the signature line on the tax return. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Joseph J. Greenberg" <news[at]greenberg.diespammerdie.netwrites: - quote - > While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back
Unless it's a very large refund, the refund just means that> in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), > is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for > a given year that they're not going to revisit that form > unless and until something gives them reason to suspect > something on it? Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that > your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from > employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in > more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their > "leisure"? your return is processable. Nothing has been verified with W-2's and 1099's at that point. That automated verification comes 12-18 months later. Meanwhile, back at the computer, it's busily analyzing to flag suspect returns for more detailed audits, which can come any time within 3 years. When can you relax? The day you mail your properly prepared return with the records to back up what's on it. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Joseph J. Greenberg" <news[at]greenberg.diespammerdie.net> writes: - quote - > This might be a real newbie question, but I've often
No.> wondered: While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back > in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), > is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for > a given year that they're not going to revisit that form > unless and until something gives them reason to suspect > something on it? - quote - > Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that
Yes. Actually, you may well get the refund *before* they> your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from > employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in > more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their > "leisure"? even cross-check the W-2 and 1099 data. - quote - > In other words, assuming a fairly straight-forward return
Given that sentence, you can relax when you filed it.> that one has answered honestly, when can one relax? But I suppose you mean when the statute of limitations expires, which for a straight-forward, honestly-answered return, will be three years after the later of the due date or the filing date. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| This might be a real newbie question, but I've often wondered: While I know that the IRS can go pretty far back in reviewing past tax forms (to the statue of limitations), is it safe to assume that once you've received a refund for a given year that they're not going to revisit that form unless and until something gives them reason to suspect something on it? Or are refunds just an acknowledgement that your numbers add up and match what the IRS received from employer(s)/payers, and they'll look at the form later "in more detail" (maniacal laugh inserted here) at their "leisure"? In other words, assuming a fairly straight-forward return that one has answered honestly, when can one relax? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| audit, period, primary |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| MSN De Lux Portfolio showing wrong data In the "% Gain" and "Averege Cost" columns Fulvio Bizzaro: Hi, have a problem with the DeLux Portfolio: Since some days, from September 2008 the calculation in the Gain/Loss is not accurate: It is... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 10-05-2008 10:41 PM | |
| "news" and "fyi" links on the "Track My Portfolio" page tom: no longer work in my Money 2000. When I click them, I get "MSN Money-Page Not Found" and "The page you requested could not be found." But there is a... | Microsoft Money | 7 | 10-25-2007 11:34 PM | |
| Problem with keeping track of shared expenses, "His", "Hers", "Ours" and How much do I owe you? P.Constantineau: Hi all, My girlfriend and I are having trouble figuring how to use money 2005 to indicate us how much we owe each other. I have setup Money 2005... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 04-03-2006 02:01 PM | |
| Money 2002 transaction status flags ("E", "C", "R") have all disappeared Nick Tonkin: Hi, After many months of using Money 2002, yesterday I suddenly noticed that the column in my resgister that shows the cleared status of each... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 02-28-2004 04:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |