Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Taxes

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-04-2004, 12:35 AM
Harlan Lunsford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Contingent fee billing methods ??

MTW wrote:

- quote -

> Do either of the following tax preparation billing methods
> violate the "contingent fee" restrictions set forth in
> Circular 230 Section 10.27 (applicable to all preparers) or
> AICPA Rule of Conduct 302 (arguably applicable to CPAs only)
> ???
> METHOD ONE: The base fee for the return is determined by a
> sliding scale that varies with income. The higher the
> income, the higher the fee. "Income" for this purpose is
> defined as "line 22" of the return in question.
> METHOD TWO: A surcharge based on a percentage of the amount
> by which itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction
> is added to the preparation fee.
> Note that in both cases the fee appears to depend on the
> "findings or results" of the service rendered. I assume that
> these billing methods are used in ALL cases and not just
> when some form of "value billing" might be justified. It is
> not clear to me whether the devotees of these methods
> EXPLICITLY DISCLOSE them to their clients.


Sure. A contingent fee is one that depends on the
successful prosecution of a case. If I file a 1040x for a
client and realize that IRS may or may not approve it,
that's pretty contingent. I could hardly charge client if
IRS disapproves, right? (I'm assuming there is reasonable
cause and basis for sustaining the case on it's merits, or
something like that).

Otherwise we are free to charge what we can get away with,
literally speaking. For a working mother with EIC form and
8812 and two state returns, I might want to charge 100$ as
compared with a retired military man with plenty of income
and just needing to file a short form. But my fee schedule
is a bit more realistic that that.

Anyway, we can charge what we want to, and also accept what
clients we want to, even to the extent of discrimination.

(Oh boy. will that raise a firestorm?)

Cheer$,
Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
  #-1  
Old 03-02-2004, 04:10 AM
MTW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Contingent fee billing methods ??

Do either of the following tax preparation billing methods
violate the "contingent fee" restrictions set forth in
Circular 230 Section 10.27 (applicable to all preparers) or
AICPA Rule of Conduct 302 (arguably applicable to CPAs only)
???

METHOD ONE: The base fee for the return is determined by a
sliding scale that varies with income. The higher the
income, the higher the fee. "Income" for this purpose is
defined as "line 22" of the return in question.

METHOD TWO: A surcharge based on a percentage of the amount
by which itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction
is added to the preparation fee.

Note that in both cases the fee appears to depend on the
"findings or results" of the service rendered. I assume that
these billing methods are used in ALL cases and not just
when some form of "value billing" might be justified. It is
not clear to me whether the devotees of these methods
EXPLICITLY DISCLOSE them to their clients.

Comments ???

MTW

<< -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << ------------------------------------------------->
 

Tags
billing, contingent, fee, methods


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29 AM.