|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Great comments so far, Thanks all for taking time to type them up. Question 1: So, what is the most tax efficient way to trade stocks? In the past, I've always traded with little thought about tax implications of what I was doing. Each April I made sure my SchedD was accurate and did not think much past that obvious point. And now a change of subject... The first thing I need to study are different types of retirement accounts. I'm not all that well informed. For example, I'm a bit fuzzy about the difference between a 401k and an IRA, and a Roth IRA. Question 2: What are some obvious tax advantages to different types of retirement accounts? Let's assume I'm 40 and I have 100k in the bank and I make 100k/year as an employee of a large corp. and they match 50% of my 401k contributions into a portfolio of mutual funds up to ... I forget. I think its $5k. -moi << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| ir4u4[at]yahoo.com (Equis Uno) wrote: - quote - > Suppose I have some savings which I'd like to invest in
Look up the tax rules for "personal holding companies".> stocks. > According to 'A guy at work', I'd be wise to setup a Corp in > Nevada, and trade through that corp. > He says that if stocks go up, I can keep the money in the > corp and I may legally delay taxation on that money until I > get it in the form of dividends. Using a corporation to hold your personal investments is a personal holding company, and it is taxed at punitive rates. Paying taxes in the 39.6% bracket on all your profits is not most people's idea of "tax efficient". And operating a Nevada corporation from California gives you the bonus of paying Nevada fees as well as California franchise tax. [remainder of bad advice also snipped] -- Chris Green << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Equis Uno wrote: - quote - > Suppose I have some savings which I'd like to invest in
Wrong. The corp. will get hit with the income tax on it in> stocks. > According to 'A guy at work', I'd be wise to setup a Corp in > Nevada, and trade through that corp. > He says that if stocks go up, I can keep the money in the > corp and I may legally delay taxation on that money until I > get it in the form of dividends. the meantime.... - quote - > If stocks go down, the losses may accumulate year after year
That didn't bother you?> and be used to offset gains in later years. > Also, he says that it would be easy for the corp to write > off trading expenses such as computers and software. > Also, losses from a wash sale cannot be considered a loss > for an individual but that rule does not apply to > corporations. > What turned me off to the whole idea is that he gave me the > number of an attorney who can 'help me'. - quote - > I'm a conservative guy; I don't want to get mixed up in
There's a 6x9 gray room with your friend's name on it> something dodgy and I don't mind paying my share of taxes. > I am curious though. > One thing that does appeal to me is that if I were to ever > get sued, all of my assets would be in an NV corp. > I'm making plans to start a service based corporation in CA. > Small businesses in some ways are sitting ducks to evil > doers so I want to have my assets kept in a safe place. waiting for him. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Suppose I have some savings which I'd like to invest in
"The guy at work" better not quit his day job. He is wrong> stocks. > According to 'A guy at work', I'd be wise to setup a Corp in > Nevada, and trade through that corp. > He says that if stocks go up, I can keep the money in the > corp and I may legally delay taxation on that money until I > get it in the form of dividends. > If stocks go down, the losses may accumulate year after year > and be used to offset gains in later years. > Also, he says that it would be easy for the corp to write > off trading expenses such as computers and software. > Also, losses from a wash sale cannot be considered a loss > for an individual but that rule does not apply to > corporations. > What turned me off to the whole idea is that he gave me the > number of an attorney who can 'help me'. > I'm a conservative guy; I don't want to get mixed up in > something dodgy and I don't mind paying my share of taxes. > I am curious though. > One thing that does appeal to me is that if I were to ever > get sued, all of my assets would be in an NV corp. > I'm making plans to start a service based corporation in CA. > Small businesses in some ways are sitting ducks to evil > doers so I want to have my assets kept in a safe place. on each issue you mention. As to using the corporation to protect your assets, that depends on the type of lawsuit and what your corporation will do. Overall, you will get very little protection if you are a service business. If your service biz is separate from your investments, then all any lawyer would have to do is go after your personal assets I.e. your ownership of the other corporation. If you are really worried about being sued, get liability insurance. Gary -- You can probably X figure out X which letters to X delete to derive my email address X. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Equis Uno wrote: - quote - > Fellow taxpayers,
Oh yeah!> Suppose I have some savings which I'd like to invest in > stocks. > According to 'A guy at work', I'd be wise to setup a Corp in > Nevada, and trade through that corp. > He says that if stocks go up, I can keep the money in the > corp and I may legally delay taxation on that money until I > get it in the form of dividends. > If stocks go down, the losses may accumulate year after year > and be used to offset gains in later years. > Also, he says that it would be easy for the corp to write > off trading expenses such as computers and software. > Also, losses from a wash sale cannot be considered a loss > for an individual but that rule does not apply to > corporations. > What turned me off to the whole idea is that he gave me the > number of an attorney who can 'help me'. > I'm a conservative guy; I don't want to get mixed up in > something dodgy and I don't mind paying my share of taxes. > I am curious though. > One thing that does appeal to me is that if I were to ever > get sued, all of my assets would be in an NV corp. > I'm making plans to start a service based corporation in CA. > Small businesses in some ways are sitting ducks to evil > doers so I want to have my assets kept in a safe place. > Comments anyone? the only guy who will make money on this deal is the attorney. 'nuff said. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| ir4u4[at]yahoo.com (Equis Uno) writes: - quote - > According to 'A guy at work', I'd be wise to setup a Corp in
If you sell and realize the gain, it'll be income to the> Nevada, and trade through that corp. > He says that if stocks go up, I can keep the money in the > corp and I may legally delay taxation on that money until I > get it in the form of dividends. corporation. If it's an S-corp, that income passes through to you. If it's a C-corp, the corporation will have to pay corporate-level income tax. So no delay of taxation. And C-corps have higher marginal rates than individuals. And *very* importantly, read up on the "personal holding company" rules, which can cause further corporate-level taxation. - quote - > If stocks go down, the losses may accumulate year after year
Which is no different than what is true for an individual> and be used to offset gains in later years. taxpayer -- except capital losses that a corporation has expire after 7 years (if my memory serves correctly), while they do not expire for an individual. - quote - > One thing that does appeal to me is that if I were to ever
One very important asset couldn't be the Nevada corporation> get sued, all of my assets would be in an NV corp. -- your shares of stock in the corporation! While it's true that someone suing you personally *may* not be able to directly attach the corporation's assets, they certainly could: (a) attach your shares in the corporation, (b) having taken control of the corp by attaching your shares, sell off the corp's assets and get their money that way. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Fellow taxpayers, Suppose I have some savings which I'd like to invest in stocks. According to 'A guy at work', I'd be wise to setup a Corp in Nevada, and trade through that corp. He says that if stocks go up, I can keep the money in the corp and I may legally delay taxation on that money until I get it in the form of dividends. If stocks go down, the losses may accumulate year after year and be used to offset gains in later years. Also, he says that it would be easy for the corp to write off trading expenses such as computers and software. Also, losses from a wash sale cannot be considered a loss for an individual but that rule does not apply to corporations. What turned me off to the whole idea is that he gave me the number of an attorney who can 'help me'. I'm a conservative guy; I don't want to get mixed up in something dodgy and I don't mind paying my share of taxes. I am curious though. One thing that does appeal to me is that if I were to ever get sued, all of my assets would be in an NV corp. I'm making plans to start a service based corporation in CA. Small businesses in some ways are sitting ducks to evil doers so I want to have my assets kept in a safe place. Comments anyone? -moi << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| efficient, stocks, tax, trade |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Car Trade-In & New Purchase User: I've got a car in Money as an asset, and an associated loan. I've never depreciated the value of the car. It's obviously worth a lot less at the... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 03-18-2007 10:52 PM | |
| HarrisDirect is now e*trade...what to do md: HarrisDirect has been taken over by e*trade. So how do I proceed. I had auto updating with HarrisDirect. With e*trade I already had an account that... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 01-14-2006 01:40 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |