|
#9
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > It would be more
dog.> > obvious if he had claimed a pet as a dependent (which I > > actually saw once 15 years ago). > Funny you mention this, but today as I was sorting through > some receipts from a client I saw vet bills in with the > medical bills. <G It's OK, that was from the day he woke up feeling like a BC << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > It would be more
Funny you mention this, but today as I was sorting through> obvious if he had claimed a pet as a dependent (which I > actually saw once 15 years ago). some receipts from a client I saw vet bills in with the medical bills. <G Carol What can one expect of a day that begins with getting out of bed. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| A.G. Kalman wrote: - quote - > evacollette3 wrote:
Others have also advocated going ahead and claiming the> > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is > > 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? > Don't concern your self with the issue of tax fraud. You > will have to file a paper return claiming your child as a > dependent and as a qualifying person for the head of > household filing status (assumes you haven't remarried). I > would attach a letter of explanation and a copy of that part > of the court decree that makes you the custodial parent. It > doesn't matter how much he paid or didn't pay for child > support. > The above assumes that you have never provided to him an IRS > Form 8332 stating that he is entitled to the dependency > exemption for 2003. dependent with a paper return, but I want to reinforce what Alan just said. Be sure to attach an explanation to the return outlining why taxpayer is clearly entitled to the exemption. And if she wants to actually quote what the father said.........! that might be interesting. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| evacollette3 wrote: - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is
Yes, it can be (but civil, not criminal). It would be more> 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? obvious if he had claimed a pet as a dependent (which I actually saw once 15 years ago). However, it can be a "messy" situation since the child is from a divorce and therefore he MIGHT have a claim. If you report him (or get audited yourself), you will still have to prove your claim to the child to show that he had no basis in fact to believe that he should. Lastly, the IRS won't even consider [civil] fraud unless the tax exceeds $500. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "evacollette3" <evacollette3[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is
Well, it doesn't rise to the level of "fraud", but it is tax> 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? cheating. File your return on paper, claiming your son, and await the resulting audit of both returns. You'll eventually get your money, and your ex will have to pay all he got and then some. -- Paul A. Thomas, CPA taxman at negia.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| evacollette3[at]yahoo.com (evacollette3) wrote: - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is
File your return (on paper, not e-file), claiming your> 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? legitimate exemption for your son. The IRS will note the discrepancy and ask EACH of you to prove your claims. If you are correct, they will disallow his claim and bill him for the additional tax (and penalty). If you don't file, he may just get away with it. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| evacollette3 wrote: - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is
Don't concern your self with the issue of tax fraud. You> 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? will have to file a paper return claiming your child as a dependent and as a qualifying person for the head of household filing status (assumes you haven't remarried). I would attach a letter of explanation and a copy of that part of the court decree that makes you the custodial parent. It doesn't matter how much he paid or didn't pay for child support. The above assumes that you have never provided to him an IRS Form 8332 stating that he is entitled to the dependency exemption for 2003. -- Alan http://taxtopics.net << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| evacollette3[at]yahoo.com posted: - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of
Short answer: Consult your attorney.> my son who is 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation > was every weekend. He has been 'ordered' to > pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide > more than 50% of my son's financial support. > When I went to file my return, I found out that > his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had > done it...he stated "he just needed the > money". Isn't this tax fraud? Long answer: The terms of the divorce settlement can *sometimes* grant the right to claim dependency to one parent, even though the person doesn't have physical or legal custody. This is a legal question first, and only once that is clarified, does it possibly become a tax question. Assuming there was no dependency order in the decree, it certainly seems to be tax fraud. However, your attorney should be consulted in any event, because you are going to be setting off a major disruption in your ex's life -- and that could threaten your own and your child's lives. Best case: He gets rousted by the IRS, has to pay back the amount of the refund he received fraudulently, and is mad at the IRS but comes to realize he better never do that again. And of course, along with that, you get to claim your son, receive the $1,000 Child Tax Credit, and any oher tax-related benefits you have coming (including perhaps Earned Income Credits). Worst case: You know the man. Can he be violent? You have stated he's already undependable when it comes to meeting the court-ordered support payment schedule. What will happen to his ability to pay after you report him? How likely will he be to meet his obligations if he learns his troubles stem from your reporting him? Now, IMHO, the ex should get the book thrown at him and be put in the stocks in the public square. Of course, that's just a measure of my own reaction to the kind of person who acts as you've described. But you have to live with his child, and you deserve thoughtful advice and guidance from someone who knows all the facts. That's a situation you *shouldn't* and probably *cannot* establish on the internet. Good luck. Seek help. Hopefully, your ex can be persuaded that prompt, regular payment and no more tax fraud is a good plan. And even more hopefully, he can follow that plan. Bill << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| evacollette3[at]yahoo.com (evacollette3) writes: - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is
Do you really care? More to the point, who gets the> 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? personal exemption for your son? Answer: you do. You cannot electronically file, so file your return on paper, claiming your son's exemption, and let IRS sort it out. Phil Marti Topeka, KS << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| evacollette3 wrote: - quote - > I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is
Probably. It stops you from E-filing, as you've noticed,> 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has > been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and > sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of > my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I > found out that his father already claimed our son as a > dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated > "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? but there shouldn't be a serious problem with paper filing. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have primary physical and legal custody of my son who is 4. In 2003, the fathers visitation was every weekend. He has been 'ordered' to pay $80 a week (which sometimes I got, and sometimes not). His father did not provide more than 50% of my son's financial support. When I went to file my return, I found out that his father already claimed our son as a dependant. When I asked him why he had done it...he stated "he just needed the money". Isn't this tax fraud? Thanks, Eva << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| claiming, dependent, falsely |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| "Exemption" Dependent vs. "Medical" Dependent Victor Roberts: I just discovered something interesting that may be useful to other non-professionals like myself (assuming I am correct.) The general rule for... | Taxes | 10 | 02-16-2004 06:10 PM | |
| Claiming dependent Nan Eklund: Client has custody of daughter, age 20, full time student. Divorce several years ago and court gave dependency deduction to father. Father stopped... | Taxes | 2 | 02-12-2004 08:29 AM | |
| Can my ex-wife be my dependent Joe Finer: My wife and I got divorced in January of 1998 and she gave me custody of our three children so she could go chasing rainbows. We did not hear a... | Taxes | 13 | 02-05-2004 08:56 PM | |
| Can be claimed as a dependent? JBoDEAN: How do I know if I am claimed as a dependent? I am 25 yrs old, and not sure if my parents still do claim me or not. When does one NOT be claimed... | Taxes | 13 | 01-27-2004 08:01 AM | |
| Claiming a dependent question? RW Buckley: My daughter goes to college full-time in another state. I am providing her sole support. She is 22 years old. She also has a new baby. She will not... | Taxes | 8 | 11-11-2003 03:46 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |