|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin[at]sprintmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I can't agree with that. In "internet retail", that may
I agree. If the business has a physical location that is> be the case, but the general rule is probably that if > you are ready and able to make the first sale, your > business has started, even if you don't actually make > a sale for some time. open to the public (store, restaurant, warehouse, etc.), the "opening" date should be fairly obvious. But, with other types of businesses, it is by no means clear. I think your "ready and able" test pretty well covers it. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Jimmy Smith wrote: - quote - > Is there a practical lower limit to the amount of startup
I can't agree with that. In "internet retail", that may> costs that need to be amortized? > I had about $1600 in expenses prior to the first sale in my > internet retail business. Mostly the costs were for web > hosting, software (including QuickBooks), software > development books and miscellanous office supplies. > If I understand the rules, my business didn't "start" until > that first sale occurred be the case, but the general rule is probably that if you are ready and able to make the first sale, your business has started, even if you don't actually make a sale for some time. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| Jimmy Smith wrote: - quote - > Is there a practical lower limit to the amount of startup
Not really--Section 195 doesn't have an exemption of that> costs that need to be amortized? sort. However, what you can do is fail to elect to amortize and then you eliminate the administrative hassle--because you don't get to deduct it until you sell the business <grin> . Seriously, I would go ahead and amortize the $1,600. Reality is that I've had agents question capitalization on items a *lot* smaller than that and the requirement to amortize is absolutely clear in the IRC. They almost certainly would prevail if they disallowed it and went to Tax Court on the matter. Now if you just write it off, the reality is that you've failed to elect to amortize and on exam the IRS can simply force you to capitalize it. -- Ed Zollars, CPA Phoenix, Arizona << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Is there a practical lower limit to the amount of startup costs that need to be amortized? I had about $1600 in expenses prior to the first sale in my internet retail business. Mostly the costs were for web hosting, software (including QuickBooks), software development books and miscellanous office supplies. If I understand the rules, my business didn't "start" until that first sale occurred - is that a set-in-stone interpretation or is there some leeway for declaring the "start" date? It seems to me that going to the trouble of amortizing that piddly amount over 5 years is a lot of administrative hassle that's barely going to make any difference in what the IRS gets from me. My life and the IRS's life would be a lot easier if I just treated those expenses as a regular deductible business expense. But if it's a big enough issue that I'll get nailed to the wall over it during an audit, I want to be sure I do it right from the outset... Suggestions? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| amortizing, costs, limit, lower, startup |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Amortizing Mortgage Incorrectly Chris Guimbellot: Hello, Money 2005. I have a mortgage entered in Money which is about two years old. Somewhere along the way (mid 2006), it began to amortize... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 01-26-2007 09:25 PM | |
| Upgrading to lower version? Alan Biddle: I currently have Money 2004 Premium which is going to "expire" for downloads in a couple of months. I never really needed the Premium version,... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 11-28-2006 07:41 PM | |
| Money Stopped Amortizing Loans news.microsoft.com: For some unknown reason, Money stopped amortizing ALL loans in its system. I noticed this when reasearching for info for taxes. All amortized... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 01-19-2005 09:04 PM | |
| Pay lower interest first?! Why? Jeff P.: I went through the Money 2004 Debt Reduction Planner with all of my debt accounts and was quite puzzled by the results. To clear the clutter, I... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-11-2004 01:25 PM | |
| Money negatively amortizing Mtg C.: refinanced mtg and set up new loan in Money using loan wizard. Not paying escrow, just Princ.& Int. Money is negatively amortizing the loan... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-03-2003 12:52 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |