|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Harlan Lunsford <lunstax[at]bellsouth.net> writes: - quote - > Ah, a very good point. Just as IRS doesn't go after
On the contrary, the IRS will in fact fine an employer which> employers who don't mail W2's to employees. (grinning) shows a pattern of failing to furnish W-2's to employees, as evidenced by a significant number of complaints from employees to whom W-2's were not furnished. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Jonathan Kamens wrote: - quote - > Victor Roberts <Vic[at]Lighting-Research.com> writes:
Ah, a very good point. Just as IRS doesn't go after> > I believe it is a violation to claim more deduction than you > > are entitled to. You are allowed to claim less. > Yes, yes, we've had this discussion over and over in this > newsgroup, and anyone who wants can go back and read it in > the archives so we don't have to have the entire discussion > again. > To summarize: > Some people here think that it's against the regulations to > claim more exemptions than the number you arrive at using > the algorithm described in the W-4 instructions. Others > think that the algorithm in the instructions is merely a > guideline, that you can use any algorithm to which will not > cause you to underpay your taxes. The vendors of all the > retail tax prep packages seem to fall into the latter > category. Everyone here seems to agree that regardless of > who's correct about the regulations, the IRS doesn't go > after people who don't underpay, regardless of how they > arrived at the number of exemptions on their W-4's. employers who don't mail W2's to employees. (grinning) Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Victor Roberts <Vic[at]Lighting-Research.com> writes: - quote - > I believe it is a violation to claim more deduction than you
Yes, yes, we've had this discussion over and over in this> are entitled to. You are allowed to claim less. newsgroup, and anyone who wants can go back and read it in the archives so we don't have to have the entire discussion again. To summarize: Some people here think that it's against the regulations to claim more exemptions than the number you arrive at using the algorithm described in the W-4 instructions. Others think that the algorithm in the instructions is merely a guideline, that you can use any algorithm to which will not cause you to underpay your taxes. The vendors of all the retail tax prep packages seem to fall into the latter category. Everyone here seems to agree that regardless of who's correct about the regulations, the IRS doesn't go after people who don't underpay, regardless of how they arrived at the number of exemptions on their W-4's. - quote - > Why do you want to do this? It will only increase the amount
He wants to fix his withholding so that he won't overpay, not> of money you owe when you file for 2004, and may subject you > to underpayment penalties. so that he'll underpay. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Victor Roberts wrote: (Referring to the W-4 form.) - quote - > I believe it is a violation to claim more deduction than you
Except in unusual circumstances, the "penalty" is only> are entitled to. You are allowed to claim less. the underwithholding of estimated tax penalty. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| jik[at]kamens.brookline.ma.us (Jonathan Kamens) wrote: - quote - > markrstephen[at]hotmail.com (Mark Stephen) writes:
Thanks !> > My wife and I had a baby last fall and now that she is not > > working, I wanted to bump up my paycheck a bit. I was set up > > as "married" with 1 dependant. So I filled out a new W4 and > > put down 2 dependants. My paycheck went up less than 1%. So > > I upped it to 3. Same thing, less than a 1% increase. > > > I wanted to up my take home pay about 5%-7% or so for the > > months that she is not working. Is there an easy way to do > > this ? How many dependants should I put down if I am married > > with a baby, without a mortgage ? > If you really want to figure this out yourself, you need to: > 1) Make an accurate estimate of what you expect your taxable > income and tax credits to be for this year, to determine an > accurate estimate of what your tax due will be. > 2) Determine how much tax has been withheld from your > paycheck so far this year, and thus how much you want to be > withheld in total for the rest of the year so that the total > for the whole year equals your expected tax due. > 3) Divide the amount you need withheld for the rest of the > year by the number of paychecks remaining in the year, to > determine how much you want withheld from each paycheck. > 4) Download IRS publication 15-T from > http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15t.pdf and use the > information in it to determine how many exemptions your W-4 > should claim to make your withholding equal to the amount > you want on each paycheck. Make sure you consider only the > taxable portion of each paycheck (e.g., exclude pre-tax > deductions for medical insurance, etc.) when doing this! > 5) Fill out a W-4 with the number of exemptions you > calculated and file it with your employer. > 6) Repeat the process later in the year if your > circumstances change (e.g., your wife starts working). > This becomes more complicated if your wife starts working > and you thus have to do the calculations on two paychecks > with different base salaries. > Personally, I find it much easier to let TurboTax do all > these calculations for me. Especially when I'm in a > sleep-deprived state as a result of living in a house with a > new baby. Speaking of which, congratulations! Now get some > sleep :-). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Mark Stephen wrote: - quote - > My wife and I had a baby last fall and now that she is not
You really need to get hold of a W4 form and read it, front> working, I wanted to bump up my paycheck a bit. I was set up > as "married" with 1 dependant. So I filled out a new W4 and > put down 2 dependants. My paycheck went up less than 1%. So > I upped it to 3. Same thing, less than a 1% increase. > I wanted to up my take home pay about 5%-7% or so for the > months that she is not working. Is there an easy way to do > this ? How many dependants should I put down if I am married > with a baby, without a mortgage ? and back. If you have only job and married with one child, four "allowances" (not dependants) is what you may claim. However if you qualify for certain credits, you may be able to claim more. Cheer$, Harlan Lunsford, EA n LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| markrstephen[at]hotmail.com (Mark Stephen) wrote: - quote - > My wife and I had a baby last fall and now that she is not
I believe it is a violation to claim more deduction than you> working, I wanted to bump up my paycheck a bit. I was set up > as "married" with 1 dependant. So I filled out a new W4 and > put down 2 dependants. My paycheck went up less than 1%. So > I upped it to 3. Same thing, less than a 1% increase. > I wanted to up my take home pay about 5%-7% or so for the > months that she is not working. Is there an easy way to do > this ? How many dependants should I put down if I am married > with a baby, without a mortgage ? are entitled to. You are allowed to claim less. Why do you want to do this? It will only increase the amount of money you owe when you file for 2004, and may subject you to underpayment penalties. -- Vic Roberts << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| markrstephen[at]hotmail.com (Mark Stephen) writes: - quote - > My wife and I had a baby last fall and now that she is not
If you really want to figure this out yourself, you need to:> working, I wanted to bump up my paycheck a bit. I was set up > as "married" with 1 dependant. So I filled out a new W4 and > put down 2 dependants. My paycheck went up less than 1%. So > I upped it to 3. Same thing, less than a 1% increase. > I wanted to up my take home pay about 5%-7% or so for the > months that she is not working. Is there an easy way to do > this ? How many dependants should I put down if I am married > with a baby, without a mortgage ? 1) Make an accurate estimate of what you expect your taxable income and tax credits to be for this year, to determine an accurate estimate of what your tax due will be. 2) Determine how much tax has been withheld from your paycheck so far this year, and thus how much you want to be withheld in total for the rest of the year so that the total for the whole year equals your expected tax due. 3) Divide the amount you need withheld for the rest of the year by the number of paychecks remaining in the year, to determine how much you want withheld from each paycheck. 4) Download IRS publication 15-T from http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15t.pdf and use the information in it to determine how many exemptions your W-4 should claim to make your withholding equal to the amount you want on each paycheck. Make sure you consider only the taxable portion of each paycheck (e.g., exclude pre-tax deductions for medical insurance, etc.) when doing this! 5) Fill out a W-4 with the number of exemptions you calculated and file it with your employer. 6) Repeat the process later in the year if your circumstances change (e.g., your wife starts working). This becomes more complicated if your wife starts working and you thus have to do the calculations on two paychecks with different base salaries. Personally, I find it much easier to let TurboTax do all these calculations for me. Especially when I'm in a sleep-deprived state as a result of living in a house with a new baby. Speaking of which, congratulations! Now get some sleep :-). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My wife and I had a baby last fall and now that she is not working, I wanted to bump up my paycheck a bit. I was set up as "married" with 1 dependant. So I filled out a new W4 and put down 2 dependants. My paycheck went up less than 1%. So I upped it to 3. Same thing, less than a 1% increase. I wanted to up my take home pay about 5%-7% or so for the months that she is not working. Is there an easy way to do this ? How many dependants should I put down if I am married with a baby, without a mortgage ? Thanks, Mark. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| questions, witholdings |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Two Questions. Beringer: I run Money 2003 on XP with all current updates. The first one has probably been talked about frequently but after reviewing the current threads... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 02-18-2004 06:33 PM | |
| 10-99 questions... Kirk: I recently did about $3,500-$4,000 worth of part time work. The guy told me he would give me a 10-99. I realize I need to pay my own taxes out of... | Taxes | 3 | 11-12-2003 03:57 PM | |
| a few more how to questions... rondi: I have installed the MSM 2004 trial version. I have some stock sells which i specified the Purchase date--referred to as Lots. I have down... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-10-2003 12:40 PM | |
| Employee Federal and State witholdings Joann: Question about Employee withholdings through payroll: When you claim your tax status (usually 0-9/single married) the payroll company witholds a... | Taxes | 2 | 11-09-2003 06:21 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |