|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Nan Eklund <naneklund[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > I don't understand the objections. We have had a couple of
My guess is that about half my clients would object to the> hundred clients so far and not one single objection to > efiling. fact that I would be transmitting their data via a third party processor, while the other half would object to the fact that I would be adding $40 bucks to their bill for the "privilege." Some clients, of course, might object on BOTH counts. <g MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Nan Eklund wrote: - quote - > I don't understand the objections. We have had a couple of
I have had a 100% objection in past years, and so far, it's> hundred clients so far and not one single objection to > efiling. still 100%. My clients do not trust "the government" - and that goes for the State of CA too. For the others, some would rather see the IRS (and the state) spend the money on having to re-type instead of on the war, so it's a political statement for them. [The war is "discretionary" while transcribing a tax return really isn't.] I'm putting my FTB 8454 file right next to my IRS form 8867 file. :-) << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I don't understand the objections. We have had a couple of hundred clients so far and not one single objection to efiling. Nan, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| D. Stussy <kd6lvw[at]bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote: - quote - > I plan on attaching (despite the "do not attach"
I like it! Drown 'em in paper!> instruction) the waiver to every paper-filed return I do > this year - just as a protest against the law. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| user[at]domain.invalid wrote: - quote - > Are there any groups that are taking action to repeal or
I plan on attaching (despite the "do not attach"> change the 2004 new California law that forces taxpayers to > E-File or sign a form that sits in the preparer's file? > This is a hardship to the taxpayer and the tax > prepaer/business. If there is no group, how can one get > started as a grass roots movement against California > Assembly Bill 1756? instruction) the waiver to every paper-filed return I do this year - just as a protest against the law. Although I got an ERO number last year, NONE of my clients wanted e-file and all specifically asked for paper when I told them that I could e-file (where the return could be - I have some that don't qualify for e-file at the federal level). << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| So far my office isn't finding it a hardship at all. So far we haven't done a single paper return nor have we had a request for one. We WILL do a paper NY NR for a CO resident and maybe do a paper WA resident, but we don't expect any problems and even our favorite paranoid is probably going to be filing electronically. Nan, EA in LA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| user[at]domain.invalid <user[at]domain.invalid> wrote: - quote - > Are there any groups that are taking action to repeal or
I have not heard of any organized groups. Nor do I know> change the 2004 new California law that forces taxpayers to > E-File or sign a form that sits in the preparer's file? > This is a hardship to the taxpayer and the tax > prepaer/business. If there is no group, how can one get > started as a grass roots movement against California > Assembly Bill 1756? whether the California CPA Society, EA Society or NATP Chapter have voiced an opinion on this matter. Has anyone out there heard anything? Perhaps the best approach at this time is "civil disobedience." Unless or until the state actually tries to fine or penalize someone, this might not be worth getting a gut ache over. MTW << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Are there any groups that are taking action to repeal or change the 2004 new California law that forces taxpayers to E-File or sign a form that sits in the preparer's file? This is a hardship to the taxpayer and the tax prepaer/business. If there is no group, how can one get started as a grass roots movement against California Assembly Bill 1756? << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| 1756, assembly, bill, efile, mandate |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Bill Summary, how can I multiselect each bill to see total at bott jeaninel: In my previous version I could hold control and select each of my bills to see my projected balance. I can't do that anymore. Is there something... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 02-04-2008 02:45 PM | |
| How will this work: Changing bill payer from MSN Bill Pay to mybank Retired Coal Miner: My one year of MSN Bill Pay premium service, included in M03 dlx is close to expiring. So I am planning to use the service from my bank, (their... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-24-2004 02:37 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |