|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Katie Jaques <katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Here's the language of the regulation in question (20 NYCRR
Depending on the job, I could make a "necessity" argument> Sec. 132.18(b)): .. . . > However, any allowance > claimed for days worked outside New York State must be based > upon the performance of services which of necessity, as > distinguished from convenience, obligate the employee to > out-of-state duties in the service of his employer. > ********** > But it's a lot easier to make the "necessity" > argument if you're at the client's location or at your > employer's office in your home state. even for working at home. For instance, a computer programmer who works for a financial institution and is on-call whenever they need him (if he's available). Problem happens; company calls. Employee can work from home and fix the problem in 5 minutes, or travel to the office in New York in which case the problem won't get fixed for 4 hours. I'd claim that avoiding the delay constitutes "necessity". Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| sethb[at]panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: - quote - > Katie Jaques <katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
Here's the language of the regulation in question (20 NYCRR> > New York has a peculiar sourcing rule that has recently been > > upheld by the highest court in that state. If you work for > > a New York employer and you spend ANY time at all during the > > taxable year at the employer's New York location, then ALL > > of your compensation for services performed at your > > out-of-state home is NY source income. > What if it is performed at a third location? > Say, at a client's site (in a third state)? > Or, if the employee's home is in a low- or no-income-tax > state, it might be cheaper for the employee to rent an > office nearby and work there rather than pay New York's > taxes. Sec. 132.18(b)): If a nonresident employee (including corporate officers, but excluding employees provided for in section 132.17 of this Part) performs services for his employer both within and without New York State, his income derived from New York State sources includes that proportion of his total compensation for services rendered as an employee which the total number of working days employed within New York State bears to the total number of working days employed both within and without New York State. The items of gain, loss and deduction (other than deductions entering into the New York itemized deduction) of the employee attributable to his employment, derived from or connected with New York State sources, are similarly determined. However, any allowance claimed for days worked outside New York State must be based upon the performance of services which of necessity, as distinguished from convenience, obligate the employee to out-of-state duties in the service of his employer. ********** As you can see, the regulation doesn't specify services performed at the employee's out-of-state residence; any services performed out of state are subject to the "necessity" test. However, if an issue involving services performed at a client's out-of-state location, or an out-of-state office of the employer, has ever arisen under this regulation and risen to the level of a published decision, I haven't seen it. Doesn't mean it hasn't happened. But it's a lot easier to make the "necessity" argument if you're at the client's location or at your employer's office in your home state. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > If you NEVER visited your employer's New York location at
Well, Ben, I'm just going by the regulation as she is writ> > any time during 2003, you have no NY source income from your > > employment and should file a nonresident return with NY > > claiming a refund of all of the taxes withheld. Of course, > > as a result of having had NY taxes withheld, you will be > > under-withheld for VA and may be subject to penalties for > > underpayment of estimated taxes. > Not so fast... > I see NY potentially subjecting the taxpayer to NY in the > above scenario under their "convenience of the employee" > rule. All NY needs is an in-state based employer. <G> ... 20 NYCRR Sec. 132.4(b) The New York adjusted gross income of a nonresident individual rendering personal services as an employee includes the compensation for personal services entering into his Federal adjusted gross income, but only if, and to the extent that, his services were rendered within New York State. Compensation for personal services rendered by a nonresident individual wholly without New York State is not included in his New York adjusted gross income, regardless of the fact that payment may be made from a point within New York State or that the employer is a resident individual, partnership or corporation. Where the personal services are performed within and without New York State, the portion of the compensation attributable to the services performed within New York State must be determined in accordance with sections 132.16 through 132.18 of this Part. (Rev. eff. 1-29-92, revised references.) I don't disagree with you that NY could take the position that services performed 100% outside NY for a NY employer produce NY source income. But they'd have to change the regulation. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Seth Breidbart" <sethb[at]panix.com> wrote: - quote - > Katie Jaques <katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
NY's attitude is you wanna litigate the matter or pay up. If> > New York has a peculiar sourcing rule that has recently been > > upheld by the highest court in that state. If you work for > > a New York employer and you spend ANY time at all during the > > taxable year at the employer's New York location, then ALL > > of your compensation for services performed at your > > out-of-state home is NY source income. > What if it is performed at a third location? > Say, at a client's site (in a third state)? > Or, if the employee's home is in a low- or no-income-tax > state, it might be cheaper for the employee to rent an > office nearby and work there rather than pay New York's > taxes. ya litigate, you're probably gonna lose. The state aint lost yet - even on appeal. -- <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Katie Jaques <katiej_1958[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > New York has a peculiar sourcing rule that has recently been
What if it is performed at a third location?> upheld by the highest court in that state. If you work for > a New York employer and you spend ANY time at all during the > taxable year at the employer's New York location, then ALL > of your compensation for services performed at your > out-of-state home is NY source income. Say, at a client's site (in a third state)? Or, if the employee's home is in a low- or no-income-tax state, it might be cheaper for the employee to rent an office nearby and work there rather than pay New York's taxes. Seth << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > If you NEVER visited your employer's New York location at
Not so fast...> any time during 2003, you have no NY source income from your > employment and should file a nonresident return with NY > claiming a refund of all of the taxes withheld. Of course, > as a result of having had NY taxes withheld, you will be > under-withheld for VA and may be subject to penalties for > underpayment of estimated taxes. I see NY potentially subjecting the taxpayer to NY in the above scenario under their "convenience of the employee" rule. All NY needs is an in-state based employer. -- <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I work for a company based and registered in NY State. I
That was a mistake that will cause you some grief. You need> used to live in NY till 2002 but for personal reasons I had > to move to VA and my company agreed on me working from home. > I have been living in VA since Jan-01-2003 so I submitted my > new W-4 to get my address updated on payroll. > As my job is actually based in NY my employer & ADP > continued deducting NY state tax from my salary. to insist that they withhold VA tax for you and stop with NY. - quote - > Now the
VA.> thing is that I have received my W-2 with VA address but NY > taxes paid. > So my question here is which state am I liable to pay taxes > for. - quote - > For how many states do I have to file my return?
NY to get a refund because you don't live there and VA topay the tax that is due. VA will see you as under withheld and may penalize you. They will not care that you have paid NY. All freely provided advice guarantee correct or double your money back Frank S. Duke, Jr. CPA Cincinnati, OH USA << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| ritindhawan[at]yahoo.com (Ritin Dhawan) wrote: - quote - > I work for a company based and registered in NY State. I
New York has a peculiar sourcing rule that has recently been> used to live in NY till 2002 but for personal reasons I had > to move to VA and my company agreed on me working from home. > I have been living in VA since Jan-01-2003 so I submitted my > new W-4 to get my address updated on payroll. > As my job is actually based in NY my employer & ADP > continued deducting NY state tax from my salary. Now the > thing is that I have received my W-2 with VA address but NY > taxes paid. > So my question here is which state am I liable to pay taxes > for. For how many states do I have to file my return? Will I > have to pay taxes to both states? If I need to file a NY > state return then can I file it with VA address? Etc. upheld by the highest court in that state. If you work for a New York employer and you spend ANY time at all during the taxable year at the employer's New York location, then ALL of your compensation for services performed at your out-of-state home is NY source income. If you NEVER visited your employer's New York location at any time during 2003, you have no NY source income from your employment and should file a nonresident return with NY claiming a refund of all of the taxes withheld. Of course, as a result of having had NY taxes withheld, you will be under-withheld for VA and may be subject to penalties for underpayment of estimated taxes. If you spent any time working in NY during 2003, then all of your compensation is NY source income unless you worked out of your home out of necessity (i.e., because you were doing something that physically could not be done anywhere else) and not for the convenience of either you or your employer. It's really hard to meet that test. So you would file a nonresident return with NY reporting all of your compensation as NY source income and claiming credit for the taxes your employer withheld. Without checking the VA statute, I can't tell you whether VA will allow you credit for the taxes you pay to NY on income from personal services that were performed at your VA home. Some states will; others won't. Katie in San Diego The foregoing is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| | |||
| |||
| "Ritin Dhawan" <ritindhawan[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > I work for a company based and registered in NY State. I
You are always subject to tax in your resident state.> used to live in NY till 2002 but for personal reasons I had > to move to VA and my company agreed on me working from home. > I have been living in VA since Jan-01-2003 so I submitted my > new W-4 to get my address updated on payroll. > As my job is actually based in NY my employer & ADP > continued deducting NY state tax from my salary. Now the > thing is that I have received my W-2 with VA address but NY > taxes paid. > So my question here is which state am I liable to pay taxes > for. For how many states do I have to file my return? Will I > have to pay taxes to both states? If I need to file a NY > state return then can I file it with VA address? Etc. NY however, can be problematic. NY has audited individuals in your type of situation, taken them to court and won, claiming that the employee worked at home for the employee's convenience. Accordingly, NY has collected income taxes based on this theory. (personally, I think its wrong - but the courts seem to support NYS) You may be able to get a credit on your resident state return for taxes paid to the non resident state. Each state is different and you need to check the rules for your particular state. Ask your employer for a letter stating that you work at home for the employer's convenience and that they do not maintain an office or any desk space for you in NY and that you are never required to be in NY for any work realted purposes. This NY issue may grow in complexity. I believe that there may be new cases and cases still on appeal. You may want to seek professional advice on how to proceed. -- <<< Benjamin Yazersky CPA [NJ & NY] > > << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi All, I work for a company based and registered in NY State. I used to live in NY till 2002 but for personal reasons I had to move to VA and my company agreed on me working from home. I have been living in VA since Jan-01-2003 so I submitted my new W-4 to get my address updated on payroll. As my job is actually based in NY my employer & ADP continued deducting NY state tax from my salary. Now the thing is that I have received my W-2 with VA address but NY taxes paid. So my question here is which state am I liable to pay taxes for. For how many states do I have to file my return? Will I have to pay taxes to both states? If I need to file a NY state return then can I file it with VA address? Etc. Any help/suggestion/guidance will be highly appreciates. Thanx, Ritin << -------------------------------------------------> << The Charter and the Guidelines for submitting > << messages to this newsgroup are at www.asktax.org > << -------------------------------------------------> |
| Tags |
| resident, state, tax, taxed |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| NY Resident and Income from NoTax State (Texas) jukebaks@nomail.com: I'm a resident of NY and subject to its state income tax. My wife and I have always filed jointly. For 2003, she has taken residency and employment... | Taxes | 4 | 01-20-2004 07:47 AM | |
| State income taxes on income earned out of state Drewremedy: Can somebody suggest some states which income tax residents on income earned out of state WITHOUT credit for income taxes paid elsewhere. EG A... | Taxes | 5 | 01-15-2004 03:47 AM | |
| NY State Tax : Resident or Part YearResident dilemma. Sannasi: During the tax year 2001, I worked both in VA and NY. Since I lived more than 183 days in VA, I am very clear that I need to file VA state resident... | Taxes | 3 | 01-04-2004 11:21 PM | |
| state tax refund taxed at this year's rate? ge: If a person expected to have substantially lower income next year, could they overpay this year's state tax, and then pay the lower marginal rate... | Taxes | 5 | 12-22-2003 10:21 PM | |
| Good idea to have LLC taxed as S corp? Cher: In order to avoid SE tax, is it a good idea to have the LLC taxed as an S corp instead of a partnership? It seems almost all LLC's are taxed as... | Taxes | 3 | 10-24-2003 06:49 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |